.com.unity Forums
  The Official e-Store of Shrapnel Games

This Month's Specials

Raging Tiger- Save $9.00
winSPMBT: Main Battle Tank- Save $6.00

   







Go Back   .com.unity Forums > Shrapnel Community > Space Empires: IV & V

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old March 20th, 2003, 03:54 AM

Chris Woods Chris Woods is offline
Private
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 10
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Chris Woods is on a distinguished road
Default Thoughts behind mounts

Hey all,

So some other comments by Users got me to thinking about mounts. Currently, I'm disatisfied with the way mounts are implemented. Basically, it's a "bigger is always better" syndrome, which doesn't make for good tactical consideration.

As an example, lets take "Large Mounts":

Cost x1.5
Tonnage x1.5
Damage x2
Supplies x2

So, basically what this amounts to is you get 2 weapons for the price of 1.5, as if getting larger hull sizes isn't enough of a reward in itself!

Mounts should not be a "no-brainer must use" thing as they currently stand. Take this counter-example for Large Mounts:

Cost x2
Tonnage x2
Range +3
Damage x1.5
Supplies x2

Ok, so now you get less damage per ton, but a better range. The better range results in the "first strike" oppurtunity, which can in some cases make up for the lost damage/tonnage ratio. This makes for a strategic consideration rather then a "must have, no brainer". Furthermore, you can remove any "minimum size" limit as the maximum hull space of the ship will eventually limit the mount you can put on it. Dreadnaughts are still better then 6 escorts for durability reasons as well as the sheer array of weapons they can use (Escorts lose a higher percentage of their space to engnies and bridge/crew/life support then a Dreadnaught will) but we haven't made escorts completly meaningless.

I really think the logic behind mounts needs to be reconsidered as the current model just falls prey to the "bigger is always better" mentality, and in a strategic game "no brainer" choices should be kept to a minimum.

Chris Woods
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old March 20th, 2003, 03:58 AM
Atrocities's Avatar

Atrocities Atrocities is offline
Shrapnel Fanatic
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: USA
Posts: 15,630
Thanks: 0
Thanked 30 Times in 18 Posts
Atrocities is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Thoughts behind mounts

There is a mount mod out. And I agree.
__________________
Creator of the Star Trek Mod - AST Mod - 78 Ship Sets - Conquest Mod - Atrocities Star Wars Mod - Galaxy Reborn Mod - and Subterfuge Mod.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old March 20th, 2003, 05:49 AM

Baron Munchausen Baron Munchausen is offline
General
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Ohio, USA
Posts: 4,323
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Baron Munchausen is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Thoughts behind mounts

Yes, mounts in SE IV are very simplistic. You can only apply ONE mount to a weapon, for example, while you could apply four or more modifiers to weapons in MOO 2. Maybe more? I dunno if there was an arbitrary limit or if there was just no weapon with more than four options available.

At least they can be restricted by technology in the latest patches. This allows all sorts of interesting variations within the restriction of one mount per weapon. Being able to apply some of the special damage types would be nice, too. Maybe for SE V.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old March 20th, 2003, 06:11 AM

Taera Taera is offline
Colonel
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Calgary, AB, Canada
Posts: 1,743
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Taera is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Thoughts behind mounts

*lightbulb sparks above head* how about that:

Cost x1.5
Tonnage x1.5
Range -1
Damage x2
Supplies x2

and -1 for each size Category.
__________________
Let the game begin!
Green bug from outa space!
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old March 20th, 2003, 06:17 AM
oleg's Avatar

oleg oleg is offline
Lieutenant General
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Oxford, UK
Posts: 2,592
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
oleg is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Thoughts behind mounts

Several mods use more balanced mounts. For example, large ship weapon mounts in Proportions have an accuracy penalty.
__________________
It is forbidden to kill; therefore all murderers are punished unless they kill in large numbers and to the sound of trumpets. - Voltaire
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old March 20th, 2003, 06:24 AM
Fyron's Avatar

Fyron Fyron is offline
Shrapnel Fanatic
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Southern CA, USA
Posts: 18,394
Thanks: 0
Thanked 12 Times in 10 Posts
Fyron is an unknown quantity at this point
Default Re: Thoughts behind mounts

Adamant mod has totally removed the base SE4 ship mounts. I am not sure if the new mounts are 100% balanced, but they are much better than the mount system of unmodded SE4.
__________________
It's not whether you win or lose that counts: it's how much pain you inflict along the way.
--- SpaceEmpires.net --- RSS --- SEnet ModWorks --- SEIV Modding 101 Tutorial
--- Join us in the #SpaceEmpires IRC channel on the Freenode IRC network.
--- Due to restrictively low sig limits, you must visit this link to view the rest of my signature.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:26 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©1999 - 2024, Shrapnel Games, Inc. - All Rights Reserved.