|
|
|
|
November 20th, 2002, 07:59 PM
|
|
Major
|
|
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Wilmington, NC, USA
Posts: 1,083
Thanks: 28
Thanked 259 Times in 83 Posts
|
|
Skill Cards - The NEW Look
Just thought everyone might like to see the look of the skill cards...
http://www.shrapnelgames.com/markhwa...s/lnl_card.jpg
__________________
Tim Brooks
Shrapnel Games
|
November 21st, 2002, 02:52 AM
|
Corporal
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Binghamton, NY
Posts: 118
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Skill Cards - The NEW Look
Looks really nice to me. Thanks for posting it!
|
November 21st, 2002, 04:48 AM
|
Major General
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Georgia, USA
Posts: 2,487
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Skill Cards - The NEW Look
The grammar needs work but the art design is great!!
May I make an text editing suggestion? How about the following for the copy?
Melee attacks by units stacked with this Leader have triple Firepower against enemies who lacked an LOS to the attackers at the beginning of the impulse.
Psitticine, the Humble Editing Parrot
|
November 21st, 2002, 04:08 PM
|
BANNED USER
|
|
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Indiana, USA
Posts: 1,393
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Skill Cards - The NEW Look
I'll back Psitticine up on this. Matter of fact, I recommend you email all the card text to him for a double check - he did a hell of a job on the TWE manual.
The artwork is sweet...
[ November 21, 2002, 14:09: Message edited by: Mike Cooney ]
|
November 21st, 2002, 07:46 PM
|
Major General
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Georgia, USA
Posts: 2,487
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Skill Cards - The NEW Look
I'd sure be happy to help out if I can.
|
November 22nd, 2002, 03:13 PM
|
|
Corporal
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Sweden
Posts: 136
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Skill Cards - The NEW Look
Like it or not, here come my 2cents...
When reading "LOS", some people think 'line of sight' others think 'el oh ess'. So choosing between 'a LOS' and 'an LOS' isn't easy. Either way it will always seem wrong to someone. Why not just avoid the problem, leave out the indefinite article, and write: ...who lacked LOS...
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|