|
|
|
Notices |
Do you own this game? Write a review and let others know how you like it.
|
|
April 10th, 2008, 05:01 AM
|
|
Corporal
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: London
Posts: 65
Thanks: 20
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
|
Body Armour
I only ask this out of curiosity, but does the armour that some modern infantry wear, make enough of a difference to a soldiers chance of staying in the fight to be represented in the game?
If it is a significant factor (and to be clear; I've no idea/opinion on if it is!) and it is in the game, how is it represented?
Cheers
|
April 10th, 2008, 05:37 AM
|
|
National Security Advisor
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Dundee
Posts: 5,955
Thanks: 464
Thanked 1,896 Times in 1,234 Posts
|
|
Re: Body Armour
No. Not in the game, not modelled. Not worthwhile in the game scale, same with AT gun shields.
Andy
|
April 10th, 2008, 05:51 AM
|
|
Captain
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Italy
Posts: 902
Thanks: 0
Thanked 55 Times in 51 Posts
|
|
Re: Body Armour
If you want you can adjust a bit the infantry toughness values in the game options menu.
I would guesss there might be a percentage of cases where body armor might turn an incapacitating wound into something manageable enough to stay in the fight but I have never researched the topic. Still between the military and the police some studies might be available if you are interested.
|
April 10th, 2008, 06:05 AM
|
|
Lieutenant General
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Salt Lake City, UT
Posts: 2,829
Thanks: 542
Thanked 797 Times in 602 Posts
|
|
Re: Body Armour
For all intents and purposes military body armor is useless against anything but fragmentation weapons. Any full jacketed military round would barely notice anything light enough for an infantryman to wear.
That said, I seem to recall that a study done during WW II indicated that something like 70% of casualties we caused by fragmentation type weapons.
__________________
Suhiir - Wargame Junkie
People should not be afraid of their governments. Governments should be afraid of their people.
"Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the the universe." - Albert Einstein
|
April 10th, 2008, 06:12 AM
|
Major
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Kladno, Czech Republic
Posts: 1,176
Thanks: 12
Thanked 49 Times in 44 Posts
|
|
Re: Body Armour
OTOH those studies often used just data from hospitals - most head shots etc. won't make it there...
__________________
This post, as well as being an ambassador of death for the enemies of humanity, has a main message of peace and friendship.
|
April 10th, 2008, 07:42 AM
|
|
Captain
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Italy
Posts: 902
Thanks: 0
Thanked 55 Times in 51 Posts
|
|
Re: Body Armour
Quote:
Suhiir said:
For all intents and purposes military body armor is useless against anything but fragmentation weapons. Any full jacketed military round would barely notice anything light enough for an infantryman to wear.
That said, I seem to recall that a study done during WW II indicated that something like 70% of casualties we caused by fragmentation type weapons.
|
I am sure this was the case until a few years ago. But with modern composite plates resistance against against military rifles round has been achieved. Interceptor with the ceramic plates can stop 7.62x51 standard rounds, although as I said I do not have a numerical breakdown of what would happen after (incapacitated percentages of body armor fitted troops vs ones without etc.)
|
April 10th, 2008, 08:06 AM
|
|
Corporal
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: London
Posts: 65
Thanks: 20
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
|
Re: Body Armour
Curiosity satisfied, thanks.
And some very interesting points too!
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|