|
|
|
|
|
June 12th, 2007, 01:21 PM
|
|
Major General
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 2,435
Thanks: 57
Thanked 662 Times in 142 Posts
|
|
ritual site search bug/feature request
The automated monthly site searching via ritual is great now that you can have more than one mage casting the same spell, but there is one minor annoyance which seems like it'd be easy to code a fix for. The auto-targeting logic targets provinces which can't have any more magic sites. In particular I'm talking about national capital provinces, but also to a much less common degree provinces which already have 4 discovered sites. I'm sure I'm not the only one who's anal retentive enough that seeing the mages target something that I *know* is a waste of gems and time is enough to make me manually re-target them...but then the next turn they're right back to targeting the waste of time because it still hasn't been searched! If you've captured two additional capitals, that's a swing of about 45 gems and 24 mage-turns to just grin and bear it if you're searching all paths...not trivial.
Anyway, not a huge thing, but if it's an easy change I'm sure I'm not the only one who would like it.
__________________
My guides to Mictlan, MA Atlantis, Eriu, Sauromatia, Marverni, HINNOM, LA Atlantis, Bandar, MA Ulm, Machaka, Helheim, Niefleheim, EA Caelum, MA Oceana, EA Ulm, EA Arco, MA Argatha, LA Pangaea, MA T'ien Ch'i, MA Abysia, EA Atlantis, EA Pangaea, Shinuyama, Communions, Vampires, and Thugs
Baalz good player pledge
|
June 12th, 2007, 01:37 PM
|
General
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,327
Thanks: 4
Thanked 133 Times in 117 Posts
|
|
Re: ritual site search bug/feature request
I'll second the request, but I don't think it's quite that simple.
Is it always targeting capitals for you? I know I've seen it search some and skip others. It also will skip other provinces at times, for no obvious reason. I haven't seen it target provinces with 4 sites, but I haven't really looked.
It looks to me like the intent to skip capitals is there, but there's something wrong with whatever it's using to determine "capitalness". I haven't noticed a pattern though.
Maybe I'll put together a test game or two and see if I can pick something out.
|
June 12th, 2007, 01:47 PM
|
|
Shrapnel Fanatic
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Vacaville, CA, USA
Posts: 13,736
Thanks: 341
Thanked 479 Times in 326 Posts
|
|
Re: ritual site search bug/feature request
Technically a capital can have other sites but its a map thing so not very likely in most games.
I dont remember my mages hitting my castle.
__________________
-- DISCLAIMER:
This game is NOT suitable for students, interns, apprentices, or anyone else who is expected to pass tests on a regular basis. Do not think about strategies while operating heavy machinery. Before beginning this game make arrangements for someone to check on you daily. If you find that your game has continued for more than 36 hours straight then you should consult a physician immediately (Do NOT show him the game!)
|
June 12th, 2007, 06:47 PM
|
|
General
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: az
Posts: 3,069
Thanks: 41
Thanked 39 Times in 28 Posts
|
|
Re: ritual site search bug/feature request
Quote:
Gandalf Parker said:
Technically a capital can have other sites but its a map thing so not very likely in most games.
I dont remember my mages hitting my castle.
|
There's also events which can add a special resource or money income magic site to the capital... unless 4 magic sites already exist at the capital.
__________________
There can be only one.
|
June 12th, 2007, 09:20 PM
|
First Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Tampa, FL
Posts: 687
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
|
Re: ritual site search bug/feature request
I've had my searching order completely disrupted by just taking independent provinces, and not fighting over them. Have 7 mages casting the 7 spells, everythings fine... capture a province and suddenly next turn everyone's on defend. Ok, usually not everyone, but most. Shortly everyone would be manual.
I've also wasted the 7-8 mageturns/15-16 gems for a full search on an enemies recently conquered capital, or my home province. Very frustrating, but I usually let it go because i've had bad luck with the whole process derailing.
|
June 13th, 2007, 04:01 AM
|
|
General
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Japan
Posts: 3,691
Thanks: 269
Thanked 397 Times in 200 Posts
|
|
Re: ritual site search bug/feature request
I think as implemented now, it's great in the beginning game, but gets less useful as the game goes on.
I think it might even skip over reclaimed provinces that have been searched by another nation, possibly. All I know is, it works fine in the beginning game, and then all the problems mentioned above start showing up once I've done something other than conquer indies.
So mid-game, I'll still try to take advantage of multi-province searching, but I check the autotarget for:
- searching in a province with 4 sites already
- searching in a capital
- searching in the current province (already searched)
- searching in a province I won't be able to keep
Any of those problems, and it's back to F1 and notes.
__________________
Whether he submitted the post, or whether he did not, made no difference. The Thought Police would get him just the same. He had committed— would still have committed, even if he had never set pen to paper— the essential crime that contained all others in itself. Thoughtcrime, they called it. Thoughtcrime was not a thing that could be concealed forever.
http://z7.invisionfree.com/Dom3mods/index.php?
|
June 12th, 2007, 01:50 PM
|
|
Major General
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 2,435
Thanks: 57
Thanked 662 Times in 142 Posts
|
|
Re: ritual site search bug/feature request
Yeah, mostly it's the capitals I noticed, I just figured it'd be the same case for provinces with 4 sites. The capitols are really the main issue anyway, as it's pretty rare to have 4 magic sites on a province with any significant amount of site searching left undone on it. I've noticed it most in targeting capitals I've captured, but I've certainly also seen it target my own capital (and to be clear there are other valid targets). It seems like it steps up the province numbers looking for the next valid target, and I haven't noticed it skipping any capitals.
Yeah Dr. P, I thought about mentioning a prioritization, but I figured a change like this would be a low priority next to some of the other bugs, so the only way it'd be likely to get in is if it was trivial to do.
__________________
My guides to Mictlan, MA Atlantis, Eriu, Sauromatia, Marverni, HINNOM, LA Atlantis, Bandar, MA Ulm, Machaka, Helheim, Niefleheim, EA Caelum, MA Oceana, EA Ulm, EA Arco, MA Argatha, LA Pangaea, MA T'ien Ch'i, MA Abysia, EA Atlantis, EA Pangaea, Shinuyama, Communions, Vampires, and Thugs
Baalz good player pledge
|
June 12th, 2007, 01:44 PM
|
|
Major General
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Lake of Hali, Aldebaran, OH
Posts: 2,474
Thanks: 51
Thanked 67 Times in 27 Posts
|
|
Re: ritual site search bug/feature request
If you're going to make the search math more complicated at all, it might as well generate a priority array of provinces each turn, and crawl through that list in descending order.
I'm just guessing about how this works and then writing in C to get what I mean accross.
Code:
for (prov = 0; prov < num_prov; prov++){
if (owners[prov] == currentplayer){
slevel = map.sitefrequency + sitefrequencyadjust(terrain[site]);
for (i = const_FIRE; i <= const_HOLY; i++){
/* If a site has been searched for one type and nothing has been found, chances of seeing something of another type go up. http://www.stat.sc.edu/~west/javahtm...MakeaDeal.html
Also Bayesian inference generally. This is not strictly the right adjustment. */
slevel += currentsearch[currentplayer][prov][i] * 25 / 7;
}
for (i = const_FIRE; i <= const_HOLY; i++){
spri[prov,i] = slevel * (4 - knownfeatures[i]);
spri[prov,i] /= exp(2,currentsearch[currentplayer][prov][i]);
/* This assumes that half of the sites are level 1, a quarter are level 2, etc. */
if (currentsearch[currentplayer][prov][i] >= 4){spri[prov,i] = 0;}
/* And of course no sites are above level 4. */
}
if (isForest(prov)){spri[prov,const_NATURE]*=1.2;}
if (isMountain(prov){spri[prov,const_EARTH]*=1.2; spri[prov,const_AIR]*=1.1;}
if (isWater(prov){spri[prov,const_WATER]*=1.2;}
if (isSwamp(prov){sprit[prov,const_DEATH]*=1.2; spri[prov,const_WATER]*=1.1; spri[prov,const_NATURE]*=1.1;}
if (isWaste(prov){sprit[prov,const_DEATH]*=1.1; spri[prov,const_FIRE]*=1.2;}
}
}
And then you sort the province #s according to their priority for each given search type. For Akashic Record or Voice of Tiamat, just some the priorities before sorting.
If someone wants to do a statistical analysis of Edi's site list and get real values... actually I'm probably the only person here who'd want to do that.
__________________
If you read his speech at Rice, all his arguments for going to the moon work equally well as arguments for blowing up the moon, sending cloned dinosaurs into space, or constructing a towering *****-shaped obelisk on Mars. --Randall Munroe
|
June 12th, 2007, 01:57 PM
|
General
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,327
Thanks: 4
Thanked 133 Times in 117 Posts
|
|
Re: ritual site search bug/feature request
That would be nice, but could you add in something to prioritize more easily defended provinces as well.
At least ones which are farther within your empire. Or castled?
It's frustrating to be expanding downwards on the map and have your searchers always searching the just taken provinces, that are most likely to be fought over again.
More seriously, while a more efficient gem gaining algorithm would be good, the current version seems broken. It searches provinces it shouldn't and ignores some that it should. Fixing that seems more urgent than improving the algorithm.
The current version also has another unrelated flaw. The next province is chosen based on those provinces held during the ritual magic phase of the turn. A province can be targeted and then lost in the battle phase. The search will still be cast on the next turn.
|
June 12th, 2007, 02:46 PM
|
|
Major General
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Lake of Hali, Aldebaran, OH
Posts: 2,474
Thanks: 51
Thanked 67 Times in 27 Posts
|
|
Re: ritual site search bug/feature request
All ritual magic happens before battles, changing that is a non-starter. Site searching spells are a minor point to make them an exception to the ordinary order of turn resolution.
As far as I can tell, what it does now is: it crawls through the list in order until it finds a site that isn't being targeted and that has none-zip-zero search points in that magic path.
Now, on the one hand, you do *eventually* want to cast Haurspex on provinces that got only a nature-1 search. OTOH, it would be a major pain if the spell searched those provinces *first*. So if you're going to change the way it works at all, you should have a prioritization algorithm.
__________________
If you read his speech at Rice, all his arguments for going to the moon work equally well as arguments for blowing up the moon, sending cloned dinosaurs into space, or constructing a towering *****-shaped obelisk on Mars. --Randall Munroe
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|