|
|
|
|
September 23rd, 2003, 07:11 AM
|
|
Corporal
|
|
Join Date: May 2003
Location: France
Posts: 79
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Question to good player: boarding
I'm trying to focus on boarding, and I would like to know, if possible, the opinion of heavy players (not necessary fat, but playing a lot ).
IF the self-destruct device would not exist, would boarding be much more important than currently?
Would it be TOO important?
[ September 23, 2003, 06:23: Message edited by: StarBaseSweeper ]
|
September 23rd, 2003, 07:40 AM
|
First Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Texas
Posts: 626
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Question to good player: boarding
In my own mods in order to make boarding abit more viable I give self destruct to the engines themselves past propulsions level 3. Makes sense since the device itself says it overloads the engines... hard to overload something that isn't there. Thus easy way to board is take out the engines with engine specific weapons. Also gives a handicap. Would have to repair the engines before making use of the ship.
__________________
Oh hush, or I'm not going to let you alter social structures on a planetary scale with me anymore. -Doggy!
|
September 23rd, 2003, 08:49 AM
|
Captain
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Australia
Posts: 809
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Question to good player: boarding
If their was no Self Destruct Device, then a Boarding Ship with Shield Depleaters would be a great combination against all types of ships, including the larger ones.
Your opponents would still have the option to add Sheild regenerators or Security Stations, so it wouldn't be overly powerful however.
|
September 23rd, 2003, 09:56 AM
|
|
General
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 4,245
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Question to good player: boarding
It could even be argues that the SDD gives an advantage to the boarder almost as much as the boardee, since it means that a small ship can annihilate a larger one without having to shoot through all that armour and components.
|
September 23rd, 2003, 10:14 AM
|
|
Major
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Oslo, Norway
Posts: 1,030
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Question to good player: boarding
Quote:
Originally posted by dogscoff:
It could even be argues that the SDD gives an advantage to the boarder almost as much as the boardee, since it means that a small ship can annihilate a larger one without having to shoot through all that armour and components.
|
That’s true only in tactical combat. In strategical, ships will refuse to board a ship with SDD
__________________
Never trust a cop with rubber gloves.
|
September 23rd, 2003, 12:02 PM
|
|
Colonel
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 1,518
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Question to good player: boarding
I've been playing as a pirate in P&N against the AI, and once the SDD arrives, its a royal pain. 9 times out of 10, I get a gutted hull, but sometimes I have to destroy the ship.
If you want to start relying on the boarding parties, then I think the SDD ought to be Banned or removed for that particular game.
Just remember, you bording ship need extra borading parties and sercurity stations, or it might get boarded first.
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|