|
|
|
 |

June 1st, 2004, 01:58 AM
|
 |
General
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Tel Aviv, Israel
Posts: 3,465
Thanks: 511
Thanked 162 Times in 86 Posts
|
|
Pangaea advice
Hi,
I am soon about to start a PBEM game as Pangaea.
I played a bit with that nation and tried several approaches. None of which was too successful.
I have a few specific questions and I would appreciate any further tips on playing Pangaea.
1. Should I take high turmoil?
High turmoil attracts maenads but lowers taxes increase unrest and forces me to patrol heavily.
2. Should I take high production?
Some heavy resource units - satyr hoplite and the armored mino.
Perhaps I can do with high sloth and produce low resource units and the sacred white centaurs?
3. Should I take high luck? Should I build for cross-breed spell?
4. I've tested a blood fountain pretender with high turmoil. It crippled my economy.
Is there a sound strategy for building blood economy?
5. Should I use a bless effect pretender? Which are the most suitable?
[ May 31, 2004, 13:14: Message edited by: izaqyos ]
|

May 31st, 2004, 02:51 PM
|
 |
Lieutenant General
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Albuquerque New Mexico
Posts: 2,997
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Pangaea advice
I don't have much experience / luck with blood, but it does seem that a blood fountain would be a bad idea, if you mean to have it blood hunting in the capitol. You really don't want to muck up your capitol, with any nation. If you take it simply to cast high-blood spells, that's different, but out of my expertise.
Unrest : The free maenads for default Pangaea are pretty decent in my opinion - just make sure to recruit enough Pans to generate lots. One very nice thing is that they generate even while you're away from your fortresses, meaning that you can get reinforcements as you go along.
High Production : depends on your plans. I've played most Carrion Woods, where I try to get the bloody cowardly satyrs killed off so I don't have to pay upkeep. This gives me a very low impression of the satyrs, because of their atrocious morale. Hoplites and the minotaurs are better, but ... Better in my opinion to go high unrest (3), 0 (or max 1) Sloth, just so you can build -some- of the heavier units.
That or take a high admin fortress (30+) to compensate somewhat.
Again - most of my experience though is Carrion Woods, or trying more for summoned armies (vine men / ogres, kitharonic lions, etc) because of my dim view of Pangaea's home brewed troops.
Thus, I also don't have much experience with blessings for them.
Hope this helped a bit. 
__________________
Wormwood and wine, and the bitter taste of ashes.
|

May 31st, 2004, 03:05 PM
|
Private
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 24
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Pangaea advice
You should rely on the centaur warriors...they are damn good. Especially buffed with strength of giants, because their hoof attack is strength-based, so it counts double. Legions of steel is also nice for survival. They have just low enough protection for it to be annoying.
I had a guy use a force like that on me, and they absolutely MAULED a horde of C'tis elite warriors.
Those centaur warriors had some experience, but the point is that with recuperation and high speed you actually have a good chance of getting and keeping experienced centaurs.
As for turmoil, No. You lose a lot of income that way, and it only means that pans in your territory will get more maenads. You want to be on the offensive, and maenads aren't that good anyway.
Beyond that I don't know enough about pangaea to answer.
|

May 31st, 2004, 03:09 PM
|
 |
General
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2000
Posts: 3,013
Thanks: 17
Thanked 25 Times in 22 Posts
|
|
Re: Pangaea advice
Quote:
Originally posted by izaqyos:
1. Should I take high turmoil?
High turmoil attracts maenads but lowers taxes increase unrest and forces me to patrol heavily.
|
Turmoil has absolutely no effect whatsoever on unrest.
|

May 31st, 2004, 04:26 PM
|
 |
General
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Tel Aviv, Israel
Posts: 3,465
Thanks: 511
Thanked 162 Times in 86 Posts
|
|
Re: Pangaea advice
Quote:
Better in my opinion to go high unrest (3), 0 (or max 1) Sloth, just so you can build -some- of the heavier units.
That or take a high admin fortress (30+) to compensate somewhat.
|
I tried that (fortress + turmoil 3) and got a very lame economy with the added burden of supporting harpy patrollers. had anyone experienced better results under the same conditions?
Also, this might be a viable strat for the carrion woods theme since it will kill economy anyway. But the deafault theme should not neglect the economy aspect.
Quote:
Turmoil has absolutely no effect whatsoever on unrest.
|
edit: I checked the manual and it confirms it.
Thanks for the correction.
I wonder why I has such a high unrest in my provinces then?- with no blood hunting and tax rate of 100 at the begining of the game??
[ May 31, 2004, 15:43: Message edited by: izaqyos ]
|

May 31st, 2004, 05:05 PM
|
 |
Lieutenant General
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Albuquerque New Mexico
Posts: 2,997
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Pangaea advice
Quote:
Originally posted by izaqyos:
I wonder why I has such a high unrest in my provinces then?- with no blood hunting and tax rate of 100 at the begining of the game??
|
Near as I can tell, every time a battle is fought in a province, the unrest goes up. (Maybe not every time, but probably most of the time.) A lot of random events also drive unrest up, and there are magic sites that also drive it up.
I try to take a look at the nation overview each turn, with units off, just to check the unrest & taxes in each one. When unrest starts getting to 20, I start thinking about dropping the taxes. If unrest is over 30, I drop taxes to 0 until unrest is 0 again.
And yes, in a couple of SP games with standard Pangaea I've had some success with the high Turmoil, 450 GP fortifications. Using Pans and the Maenads in conjunction with regular troops worked well enough that I could have 2 armies taking provinces from very early in the game.
One of course was my Carrion Dragon; the other would have a dryad, a Pan, and a centaur or two commanding satyrs and centaurs. Generally I'd attack a province, search it the next turn, and have enough Maenads again to attack the next province.
Then, the 30 admin fort would be built, not so much on high resource provinces, but on high gold provinces (especially with high resource neighbors). If a province generated 50 GP a turn, the fortress pays itself off in 30 turns. Faster than that, imo, because it keeps me from losing the base 50 for a couple of turns to a random event invasion.
I'm not saying this is an ideal way to play stock Pangaea, but my test SP games (going to turn 30 or 40) against difficult opponents tended to have me in the leading position on most graphs.
__________________
Wormwood and wine, and the bitter taste of ashes.
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|