|
|
|
 |

June 21st, 2004, 12:36 AM
|
Sergeant
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 229
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
|
Should improving Arcoscephale Golden Era be a priority?
I'd like to get a sampling of the general community and their feelings about GE Arcoscephale. I'd like to think that I'm not the only one who loves the concept of this theme, but feels they are comparatively weak when compared to other races... in particular to Base Arcoscephale, which is generally considered one of the stronger nations. I've tried not to include any bias in the questions, but I think most people know where I stand =).
[ June 20, 2004, 23:37: Message edited by: Blitz ]
|

June 21st, 2004, 01:11 AM
|
 |
Lieutenant General
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 2,687
Thanks: 20
Thanked 54 Times in 39 Posts
|
|
Re: Should improving Arcoscephale Golden Era be a priority?
it is weak, though not the weakest.
i can't really see it as being a priority, however.
hopefully sometime they will be given a bit more oomph. perhaps make the troops affordable?
I'd say the automatic success of fatigue attacks should be more of a priority, since, as presently constituted, they seem like the new "pre-2.11 paralysis".
|

June 21st, 2004, 01:20 AM
|
Lieutenant General
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Alaska
Posts: 2,968
Thanks: 24
Thanked 221 Times in 46 Posts
|
|
Re: Should improving Arcoscephale Golden Era be a priority?
The wind riders need a price tweak, other than that, it's fine.
|

June 21st, 2004, 01:21 AM
|
 |
Lieutenant General
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 2,687
Thanks: 20
Thanked 54 Times in 39 Posts
|
|
Re: Should improving Arcoscephale Golden Era be a priority?
lol what about the resource cost of their fairly uninspiring hvy infantry, the myrmidons? 35 resources for an enforced sloth theme...
|

June 21st, 2004, 01:42 AM
|
Major General
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 2,425
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Should improving Arcoscephale Golden Era be a priority?
GE is fine. You want to see some seriously underwhelming themes, take a look at BK Tien Chi, NE Pan, or Raptor Caelum. GE Arco is far from bottom of the heap. Hell, Tien Chi, period, seems kinda underwhelming. When was the Last time you saw them in a game, and how well did they do? 
|

June 21st, 2004, 01:59 AM
|
Second Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Titusville, FL
Posts: 450
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Should improving Arcoscephale Golden Era be a priority?
I have to concur with Norfleet in his assessment that there are far more critical areas than GE Arco to work on. Raptor Caelum in _particular_ suffers horribly in respect to the main theme. (I
've never tried to play BK Tien Chi.)
In regard to Tien Chi, I have made the observation that it does seem to be a nation that the AI is able to play well. If this is the case (and not simply my own poor play skill vis-a-vis TC), it might do well to study Tien Chi to try to figure out why the computer does relatively well playing it.
For the sake of completeness for the survey, though, I noted that question #2 seems to have no real positive answer. You ask, 'Should GE be a priority?", and the _most_ positive answer is 'if the designers have time'. I think that a simple 'yes' answer should be added to the poll.
__________________
Scott Hebert
Gaming Aficionado
Modding Beginner
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|