|
|
|
View Poll Results: Which One Would You Buy
|
AMD 64
|
|
13 |
44.83% |
AMD (Not 64)
|
|
5 |
17.24% |
Intel P4
|
|
11 |
37.93% |
Intel Other
|
|
0 |
0% |
|
May 10th, 2005, 02:52 PM
|
|
Shrapnel Fanatic
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: USA
Posts: 15,630
Thanks: 0
Thanked 30 Times in 18 Posts
|
|
AMD vs Intel
I just read some interesting things about crytek, MS XP, and AMD 64bit processors. LINK
So now my question is, what would you go with, an AMD 64, or a P4?
__________________
Creator of the Star Trek Mod - AST Mod - 78 Ship Sets - Conquest Mod - Atrocities Star Wars Mod - Galaxy Reborn Mod - and Subterfuge Mod.
|
May 11th, 2005, 06:09 AM
|
|
Major
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Searching for a holy grail.
Posts: 1,001
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: AMD vs Intel
Last time I actually brought a processor AMD were loads cheaper for equivalent performance. Assuming that hasn't changed and assuming there's a massive premium for AMD 64 (When isn't there a premium for a new technology?) I'd go standard 32bit AMD.
Of course if it's not loads more expensive I'd go AMD 64.
__________________
He who disagrees with me in private, call him a fool. He who disagrees with me in public, call him an ambulance.
|
May 11th, 2005, 12:45 PM
|
|
Lieutenant Colonel
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: DC Burbs USA
Posts: 1,460
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
|
Re: AMD vs Intel
Unless you are really really really PC savy, XP64 is not for you. I run both AMD and Intel systems, and have gotten good service from both. With that said, Intel still has the edge because of their chipsets. You can't go wrong with a P4 in an Intel board.
__________________
Think about it
|
May 11th, 2005, 04:08 PM
|
|
Lieutenant Colonel
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Emeryville, CA
Posts: 1,412
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: AMD vs Intel
A 64-bit processor is kind of overkill if you're not doing lots of 64-bit calculations or don't need tons of memory (real or virtual). Best value would be AMD processors in the "middle range", like 3000+ to 3400+. I have a P4, and those are nice too, especially with an Intel board... but it's more expensive.
__________________
GEEK CODE V.3.12: GCS/E d-- s: a-- C++ US+ P+ L++ E--- W+++ N+ !o? K- w-- !O M++ V? PS+ PE Y+ PGP t- 5++ X R !tv-- b+++ DI++ D+ G+ e+++ h !r*-- y?
SE4 CODE: A-- Se+++* GdY $?/++ Fr! C++* Css Sf Ai Au- M+ MpN S Ss- RV Pw- Fq-- Nd Rp+ G- Mm++ Bb@ Tcp- L+
|
May 12th, 2005, 04:37 PM
|
Corporal
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Omaha, NE
Posts: 131
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: AMD vs Intel
I actually just built my new system a couple of months ago. Went Athlon 3200+ (Winchester) on an MSI K8N Neo2 board with 1 gb of PDP Dual-channel PC3200 memory. SE sure runs a lot faster than on my old Athlon 650 T-bird.
|
May 12th, 2005, 05:26 PM
|
|
Shrapnel Fanatic
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Waterloo, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 11,451
Thanks: 1
Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
|
|
Re: AMD vs Intel
I'm currently playing a PBW turn on my P2-166 lappy.
Why do you need anything more?
__________________
Things you want:
|
May 13th, 2005, 05:41 AM
|
|
Colonel
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 1,661
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: AMD vs Intel
Quote:
Suicide Junkie said:
I'm currently playing a PBW turn on my P2-166 lappy.
Why do you need anything more?
|
To play Starfury and then SE V!
|
May 13th, 2005, 12:44 PM
|
|
Major
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Taganrog, Russia
Posts: 1,087
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: AMD vs Intel
Quote:
Suicide Junkie said:
I'm currently playing a PBW turn on my P2-166 lappy.
Why do you need anything more?
|
Ship/construction queue list with >500 items takes about a minute to load on my p2-350. Annoying.
|
May 13th, 2005, 10:48 AM
|
|
Sergeant
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: USA
Posts: 368
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: AMD vs Intel
I am a big convert to AMD. It started when I built my first Athlon 1500+ machine. Before that I was Intel only. But intel was 2 to 3 times as expensive. Now I have a rock'n machine that didn't cost that much to build. AMD is just too cost effective to pass up.
Here are my specs:
Antec Super LANBOY Case
Antec 480W Power Supply TRUE480
MSI "K8T NEO2-F" VIA K8T800 Pro
EGA GeForce FX 6800 DDR 128MB
AMD Athlon™64 3200+ 2.0GHz, 512KB L2 Cache 939-Pin 64-bit Processor
1 GB RAM (2 X 512MB 3200 DDR 400) Corsair
Seagate 120GB 8mb cache 7200 HD
Western Digital 25GB
Soundblaster Audigy 2 ZS
DVD ROM 8x
DVD+R/RW and -R/RW Drive 4X Dual Format
|
May 13th, 2005, 12:22 PM
|
|
Lieutenant Colonel
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: DC Burbs USA
Posts: 1,460
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
|
Re: AMD vs Intel
Quote:
atomannj said:
I am a big convert to AMD. It started when I built my first Athlon 1500+ machine. Before that I was Intel only. But intel was 2 to 3 times as expensive. Now I have a rock'n machine that didn't cost that much to build. AMD is just too cost effective to pass up.
Here are my specs:
Antec Super LANBOY Case
Antec 480W Power Supply TRUE480
MSI "K8T NEO2-F" VIA K8T800 Pro
EGA GeForce FX 6800 DDR 128MB
AMD Athlon™64 3200+ 2.0GHz, 512KB L2 Cache 939-Pin 64-bit Processor
1 GB RAM (2 X 512MB 3200 DDR 400) Corsair
Seagate 120GB 8mb cache 7200 HD
Western Digital 25GB
Soundblaster Audigy 2 ZS
DVD ROM 8x
DVD+R/RW and -R/RW Drive 4X Dual Format
|
Got any benchmarks to show us?
__________________
Think about it
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|