|  | 
| 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
    
    
 |  | 
 
 
	
		|  |  |  
	
	
		
	
	
	| 
			
			 
			
				April 25th, 2008, 01:45 PM
			
			
			
		 |  
	| 
		
			|  | 
 General |  | 
					Join Date: Aug 2003 Location: Sweden 
						Posts: 4,463
					 Thanks: 25 
		
			
				Thanked 92 Times in 43 Posts
			
		
	      |  |  
    
	| 
				 AI spell casting priorities 
 Hi, 
 Seems like some spells might be too popular.
 
 I've heard about:
 Astral Shield
 Arrow Fend (recently heard of this, so I'm not sure how bad it is)
 
 Any others since last patch?
 |  
	
		
	
	
	| 
			
			 
			
				April 25th, 2008, 01:48 PM
			
			
			
		 |  
	| 
		
			|  | Second Lieutenant |  | 
					Join Date: Jul 2007 Location: Durham, NC 
						Posts: 509
					 Thanks: 84 
		
			
				Thanked 44 Times in 14 Posts
			
		
	      |  |  
    
	| 
				 Re: AI spell casting priorities 
 Bone Grinding (typically over Undead Mastery) |  
	
		
	
	
	| 
			
			 
			
				April 25th, 2008, 02:01 PM
			
			
			
		 |  
	| 
		
			
			| 
 General |  | 
					Join Date: Oct 2007 Location: Poland 
						Posts: 3,414
					 Thanks: 26 
		
			
				Thanked 73 Times in 49 Posts
			
		
	      |  |  
    
	| 
				 Re: AI spell casting priorities 
 Kristoffer:
 Black list! We want the ability to set a list of spells that our mages are forbidden to cast!
 |  
	
		
	
	
	| 
			
			 
			
				April 25th, 2008, 02:01 PM
			
			
			
		 |  
	| 
		
			|  | 
 Major General |  | 
					Join Date: Jan 2004 Location: Columbus, OH 
						Posts: 2,204
					 Thanks: 67 
		
			
				Thanked 49 Times in 31 Posts
			
		
	      |  |  
    
	| 
				 Re: AI spell casting priorities 
 
	Quote: 
	
		| Zeldor said: Kristoffer:
 
 Black list! We want the ability to set a list of spells that our mages are forbidden to cast!
 
 |  Seriously. This would fix most of the problems.
 
Jazzepi |  
	
		
	
	
	| 
			
			 
			
				April 25th, 2008, 02:15 PM
			
			
			
		 |  
	| 
		
			|  | 
 Lieutenant Colonel |  | 
					Join Date: May 2007 
						Posts: 1,462
					 Thanks: 34 
		
			
				Thanked 59 Times in 37 Posts
			
		
	      |  |  
    
	| 
				 Re: AI spell casting priorities 
 +1 vote for blacklist.If you really want to fix the problem, it will be definitely the best fix
 |  
	
		
	
	
	| 
			
			 
			
				April 25th, 2008, 02:38 PM
			
			
			
		 |  
	| 
		
			|  | 
 Lieutenant Colonel |  | 
					Join Date: Nov 2006 Location: Ghent, Belgium 
						Posts: 1,333
					 Thanks: 39 
		
			
				Thanked 59 Times in 43 Posts
			
		
	      |  |  
    
	| 
				 Re: AI spell casting priorities 
 Okey, people.  I suspect KO has already heard about the blacklist idea, and that it won't be very easy to implement.  
 While a blacklist might fix some issues, that's not the point here.  KO is asking specifically for spells that have too high spellcasting priority, probably with the intention of fixing that.  Wether or not at one point in the future there might possibly be thought of maybe adding a blacklist feature, it won't be today, nor tomorrow.  In the meantime having the priority of the ridiculously popular spells lowered would be wonderful, so the least we can do is help the guy out when he asks for input instead of throwing requests for a new feature in his face.
 
 Having said all that, I can't think of one not already mentioned right now, but I'll definitely keep my eyes open.
 
 Edit:  Oh, and thanks, KO, for caring.
 
				__________________ 
				Praeterea censeo, contributoribus magnae auctoritatis e Foro Shrapnelsi frequenter in exsilium eiectis, eos qui verum auxilium petunt melius hoc situ  adiuvari posse.
			 |  
	
		
	
	
	| 
			
			 
			
				April 25th, 2008, 06:04 PM
			
			
			
		 |  
	| 
		
			|  | 
 Captain |  | 
					Join Date: Oct 2007 Location: guess - and you'll be wrong 
						Posts: 834
					 Thanks: 33 
		
			
				Thanked 187 Times in 66 Posts
			
		
	      |  |  
    
	| 
				 Re: AI spell casting priorities 
 Marble Warriors seems to take priority over Army of Gold, strangely.
 Edit: This is not necessarily true, as I was using Army of Gold improperly.
 |  
	
		
	
	
	| 
			
			 
			
				April 25th, 2008, 06:33 PM
			
			
			
		 |  
	| 
		
			|  | 
 Major |  | 
					Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: Moscow, Russia 
						Posts: 1,045
					 Thanks: 177 
		
			
				Thanked 23 Times in 21 Posts
			
		
	      |  |  
    
	| 
				 Re: AI spell casting priorities 
 Is it possible to lower priority for gem-using spells in general? This is the reason I need to park gems in some scout/fighter commander & transfer tham to mage each turn - or else hust not use gems...    I don't think that this amount of micromanagement is much fun... |  
	
		
	
	
	| 
			
			 
			
				April 25th, 2008, 07:09 PM
			
			
			
		 |  
	| 
		
			|  | 
 Major |  | 
					Join Date: Apr 2004 Location: La La Land (California, USA) 
						Posts: 1,244
					 Thanks: 0 
		
			
				Thanked 30 Times in 11 Posts
			
		
	      |  |  
    
	| 
				 Re: AI spell casting priorities 
 I hate Touch of Madness.  With a passion.  It should never be cast unscripted.I never leave a mage unscripted, but I know that if the AI decides that a nature
 spell is not worth the gems, it will default to Touch of Madness, and send
 archers or mages into the fray.  At the end of the battle, the number of
 casulties precisely matches the number of targeted units.
 
 And not a single gem should be used against a retreating enemy, ever.  What
 really sucks, and I have seen it happen at least once, is when the AI decides
 that it does not need Arrow Fend when I am storming a castle, but once the
 enemy has routed, summoning some Air Elementals is a damn good idea.  Arrow
 Fend, by the way, is one of the spells I'd love to see as "scripted only".
 If you can't be bothered to script it, you should not benefit from it.
 
				__________________No good deed goes unpunished...
 |  
	
		
	
	
	| 
			
			 
			
				April 25th, 2008, 07:45 PM
			
			
			
		 |  
	| 
		
			
			| 
 BANNED USER |  | 
					Join Date: Feb 2007 
						Posts: 5,463
					 Thanks: 165 
		
			
				Thanked 324 Times in 190 Posts
			
		
	      |  |  
    
	| 
				 Re: AI spell casting priorities 
 If you can't be bothered to script it you shouldn't benefit? That's a weird thing to say. For one thing, who would ever benefit from arrow fend being cast unscripted? Only the AI would have air mages of sufficient skill kicking about with handfuls of gems and no script and most of the time it would still be a bad choice of spell.
 Also, why the hostility towards people who don't script? I can't be arsed with the micro hassle of it most of the time. I script when I want certain powerful spells cast or have a definite battlemage script assigned to a number, but that's about it.
 
 
 I personally think all spells which require gems (other than blood spells) should be 'script only'. The only problem there is the AI nations obviously wouldn't cast any combat spells requiring gems, which is a pretty big problem I admit.
 
 It would definitely be good if any spells which are likely to either be a waste of gems/time or harmful to your own side (like berserk causing spells) were either really low priority or script only. Niche spells like ones only useful to thugs (shields, breath of winter etc), ones which summon neutral creatures (lammashtas, horrors etc) and so on should all be low priority or script only. That way unscripted mages would be more likely to cast something generally useful.
 
			
			
			
			
				  |  
	
		
	
	
	
	
	
	
	| 
	|  Posting Rules |  
	| 
		
		You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts 
 HTML code is On 
 |  |  |  |  |