|
|
|
Notices |
Do you own this game? Write a review and let others know how you like it.
|
 |
|

January 1st, 2009, 03:27 PM
|
 |
Corporal
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Norway
Posts: 69
Thanks: 4
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
|
|
Armour vs. civilian
I had this thought that I had to try out.
Israel vs. PLO, Israel attack.
I sat up a small battle, 20 x 20 map, with a platoon (3 MBT) of Merkava Mk4b against 4 platoons of civilians (rock throwing protesters).
My question was, could these rock throwing protesters knock out a Merkava, and they could.
My intention all the time was to try to make this happen.
I drove around just waiting, and they popped up or run away.
But when I had a chance, I stopped my vehicle in the middle of a crowd, waiting. And it happened. Boom, they blew me up, and killed my crew, if the crew survived.
So, my question is this.
Is this realistic?
If these civilians had a grenade, or a pistol or something, they might knock out a MBT, if the MBT was in a street, with no sight and the crew had their hatches open, but knock out a MBT with stones?
Any thoughts?
|

January 1st, 2009, 04:39 PM
|
Corporal
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 112
Thanks: 1
Thanked 10 Times in 7 Posts
|
|
Re: Armour vs. civilian
Take it as the civilians climbed on your tank, pulled the crewmembers out from the open hatches and beat them to death with the stones. Just because the icon for a destroyed unit always shows a vehicle on fire, it doesn't mean that the vehicle blows up and catches on fire every time it's destroyed. It's just another abstraction. The MBT is just as knocked out in game terms, regardless of what kills the crew.
So yeah it is realistic that the tank, which you parked in the middle of the street with hatches open with a crew instructed not to fire at the enemy, to get knocked out in this fashion.
|

January 1st, 2009, 05:59 PM
|
 |
First Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Ottawa, Canada
Posts: 733
Thanks: 74
Thanked 16 Times in 15 Posts
|
|
Re: Armour vs. civilian
Try the same with Infantry Support, The IDF has it's urban warfare stuff together and a lone or even 3 MBT's without Infantry Support doesn't sound like it would happen. IMHO
Bob out 
|

January 1st, 2009, 06:01 PM
|
 |
Corporal
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Norway
Posts: 69
Thanks: 4
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
|
|
Re: Armour vs. civilian
Well, that’s a thought since the first unit was ready, not buttoned up or anything.
But what about my two other MBTs that was buttoned up, all hatches closed?
One of them was destroyed, the other was immobile.
The Merkava Mk 4 is an awesome weapon, built special for urban warfare, so it’s still a thought, isn’t it?
|

January 1st, 2009, 06:06 PM
|
 |
Corporal
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Norway
Posts: 69
Thanks: 4
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
|
|
Re: Armour vs. civilian
Sorry Bob, you had already replied while I was writing my reply, so I didn’t see it before posting.
Of course you don’t drive around in a urban environment without infantry support, that is asking for trouble.
But the question still remains, how can you knock out a buttoned up MBT like the Merkava, or which MBT you would choose by throwing rocks?
|

January 1st, 2009, 06:27 PM
|
 |
National Security Advisor
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Dundee
Posts: 5,994
Thanks: 488
Thanked 1,927 Times in 1,254 Posts
|
|
Re: Armour vs. civilian
Quote:
Originally Posted by m113apc
Sorry Bob, you had already replied while I was writing my reply, so I didn’t see it before posting.
Of course you don’t drive around in a urban environment without infantry support, that is asking for trouble.
But the question still remains, how can you knock out a buttoned up MBT like the Merkava, or which MBT you would choose by throwing rocks?
|
Any infantry can destroy tanks by close assaulting them.
Those without A/T weapons may well run away in tank panic or become severely suppressed if they fail.
"Rocks" are not rocks - they are a class 1 infantry weapon with range 1 (or 2?). The game has no "rock" or "spear" or "bow" weapon classes. So they ripped open a hatch and sprayed the insides of the tank crew compartment with a class 1 HE weapon.
Before WW2, some Abyssinian tribesmen dealt with an Italian tankette by swarming it and then manually flipping it onto its back. Then they lit a fire under it.
Cheers
Andy
|

January 1st, 2009, 11:21 PM
|
 |
First Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Ottawa, Canada
Posts: 733
Thanks: 74
Thanked 16 Times in 15 Posts
|
|
Re: Armour vs. civilian
Boils Down to where there is a will there is a way!
Bob out 
|

January 2nd, 2009, 03:51 PM
|
 |
Captain
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Italy
Posts: 902
Thanks: 0
Thanked 55 Times in 51 Posts
|
|
Re: Armour vs. civilian
Quote:
Originally Posted by Koh
Take it as the civilians climbed on your tank, pulled the crewmembers out from the open hatches and beat them to death with the stones. Just because the icon for a destroyed unit always shows a vehicle on fire, it doesn't mean that the vehicle blows up and catches on fire every time it's destroyed. It's just another abstraction. The MBT is just as knocked out in game terms, regardless of what kills the crew.
|
Well,if you have managed to open the hatches and lynch the crew, setting it on fire and maybe blowing it up is the easy part.
Scrounge a can of gasoline or whatever, pour it inside and light it up. The firefighting system cannot be that good.
|

January 2nd, 2009, 03:22 PM
|
 |
Sergeant
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 358
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Armour vs. civilian
Quote:
Originally Posted by m113apc
So, my question is this.
Is this realistic?
If these civilians had a grenade, or a pistol or something, they might knock out a MBT, if the MBT was in a street, with no sight and the crew had their hatches open, but knock out a MBT with stones?
Any thoughts?
|
Very realistic.
Bloke nonchalantly walks up beside the Tank.
Bloke then pulls the external Fire Extinguisher system handle.
Tank is knocked out, Crew have a strong incentive to get out.
Tank-jacking is easy if you have the right tools, and the Tank is not going to fire back (as is the case in the test you ran).
|

January 2nd, 2009, 04:10 PM
|
Major
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Kladno, Czech Republic
Posts: 1,176
Thanks: 12
Thanked 49 Times in 44 Posts
|
|
Re: Armour vs. civilian
Remeber that tank rampage when some nutjob stole an M-60 near LA (IIRC) a while ago? It ended with a police officer - ex tanker - opening the driver's hatch and putting bullet into his head when the tank got stuck. A suitable stone would work as well I suppose.
__________________
This post, as well as being an ambassador of death for the enemies of humanity, has a main message of peace and friendship.
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|