|
|
|
 |
|

December 4th, 2003, 06:11 AM
|
 |
Shrapnel Fanatic
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: CHEESE!
Posts: 10,009
Thanks: 0
Thanked 7 Times in 1 Post
|
|
Re: Post 1.84 beta history
Quote:
9. Fixed - Decreased seeker damage factor required to move to next target.
|
huh?
Fyron: humbug.
__________________
If I only could remember half the things I'd forgot, that would be a lot of stuff, I think - I don't know; I forgot!
A* E* Se! Gd! $-- C-^- Ai** M-- S? Ss---- RA Pw? Fq Bb++@ Tcp? L++++
Some of my webcomics. I've got 400+ webcomics at Last count, some dead.
Sig updated to remove non-working links.
|

December 4th, 2003, 06:39 AM
|
National Security Advisor
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2000
Posts: 5,085
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Post 1.84 beta history
5. Added - Empire style directory label to the Empire setup window.
zuh?
__________________
Phoenix-D
I am not senile. I just talk to myself because the rest of you don't provide adequate conversation.
- Digger
|

December 4th, 2003, 06:56 AM
|
 |
Shrapnel Fanatic
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Southern CA, USA
Posts: 18,394
Thanks: 0
Thanked 12 Times in 10 Posts
|
|
Re: Post 1.84 beta history
Quote:
Originally posted by Phoenix-D:
5. Added - Empire style directory label to the Empire setup window.
zuh?
|
The game should display the name of the race folder next to the shipset images when you are scrolling through them. This should come in very handy for PBW for people that haven't memorized the namaes of all their shipsets. Now, why he said "empire style" is beyond me...
|

December 4th, 2003, 10:38 AM
|
Major
|
|
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Solomon Islands
Posts: 1,180
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Post 1.84 beta history
Quote:
Originally posted by Instar:
mousey wheels
wheeeeeeee
oh ya, us betas get this info. Usually richard goes ahead and does it. So I guess its ok
|
How about making all lists (construction, ships, colonies, planets) remember their places, instead of just the events list?
|

December 4th, 2003, 03:08 PM
|
 |
Lieutenant General
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Oxford, UK
Posts: 2,592
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Post 1.84 beta history
Quote:
Originally posted by Q:
"8. Fixed - Drones were not inflicting special damage types."
That's strange. I used frequently drones with special damage weapons and as far as I have seen it without problems. What kind if special damage did not work??
|
May be it was an artifact in the intermediate 1.85 patch, beta-testers find it and now it is back to normal ? 
__________________
It is forbidden to kill; therefore all murderers are punished unless they kill in large numbers and to the sound of trumpets. - Voltaire
|

December 4th, 2003, 03:44 PM
|
 |
General
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
Posts: 4,547
Thanks: 1
Thanked 7 Times in 5 Posts
|
|
Re: Post 1.84 beta history
Quote:
Originally posted by Q:
That's strange. I used frequently drones with special damage weapons and as far as I have seen it without problems. What kind if special damage did not work??
|
On their warheads - sure, a drone could fire a nullspace projector or an ionic disperser, but you couldn't create a working nullspace or anti-ionic drone warhead! Hmmm... drones with the Allegiance Subverter's damage type... Borg assimilation probes, anyone?
Great list of changes BTW! I'm actually starting to dread the coming of Christmas because the sooner it comes, the less time there is to add and fix stuff! 
__________________
The Ed draws near! What dost thou deaux?
|

December 4th, 2003, 03:48 PM
|
 |
Colonel
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 1,661
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Post 1.84 beta history
Quote:
Originally posted by Ed Kolis:
quote: Originally posted by Q:
That's strange. I used frequently drones with special damage weapons and as far as I have seen it without problems. What kind if special damage did not work??
|
On their warheads - sure, a drone could fire a nullspace projector or an ionic disperser, but you couldn't create a working nullspace or anti-ionic drone warhead! Hmmm... drones with the Allegiance Subverter's damage type... Borg assimilation probes, anyone?
Great list of changes BTW! I'm actually starting to dread the coming of Christmas because the sooner it comes, the less time there is to add and fix stuff! Thank you for this explanation Ed.
The Borg assimilation drones were exactely one of the examples I use frequently, but as you said not with a warhead but a weapon component.
|

December 4th, 2003, 07:31 PM
|
General
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Ohio, USA
Posts: 4,323
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Post 1.84 beta history
Quote:
Originally posted by Q:
"8. Fixed - Drones were not inflicting special damage types."
That's strange. I used frequently drones with special damage weapons and as far as I have seen it without problems. What kind if special damage did not work??
|
No. Special damage types have never worked with drone warheads. I have wanted to be able to build 'plague drones' for years and it is only now possible. Now I can infect entire systems in a single attack... And just think of the other possibilities! Tachyon warheads to make weapon-neutralizing drones for starbase assault! (Drones go in and kill the weapons before your ships have to go in...) Or neutrino warheads to neutralize shield generators! Ionic warheads carried by super-fast drones to disable ships' engines and let your slower ships catch them! "Smart bomb" drone warheads to let you knock out space ports or resupply depots without even having to send in ships! Quad damage to shields and null-space are some other cool damage types for a drone warhead, but I can't think of any 'special' tactics they would allow. Just standard combat uses like ordinary explosive warhead.
[ December 04, 2003, 23:15: Message edited by: Baron Munchausen ]
|

December 4th, 2003, 07:40 PM
|
 |
Lieutenant General
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Oxford, UK
Posts: 2,592
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Post 1.84 beta history
Quote:
Originally posted by Baron Munchausen:
quote: Originally posted by Q:
"8. Fixed - Drones were not inflicting special damage types."
That's strange. I used frequently drones with special damage weapons and as far as I have seen it without problems. What kind if special damage did not work??
|
No. Special damage types have never worked with drone warheads. I have wanted to be able to build 'plague drones' for years and it is only now possible. Now I can infect entire systems in a single attack... And just think of the other possibilities! Tachyon warheads to make weapon-neutralizing drones for starbase assault! (Drones go in and kill the weapons before your ships have to go in...) Or neutrino warheads to neutralize shield generators! Ionic warheads carried by super-fast drones to disable ships' engines and let your slower ships catch them! "Smart bomb" drone warheads to let you knock out space ports or resupply depots without even having to send in ships! Quad damage to shields and null-space are some other cool damage types for a drone warhead, but I cna't think of any 'special' tactics they would allow. Just standad combat uses like ordinary explosive warhead. But why do you need warheads for such designs ??
You can achive the same with weapons on drones.
Mod short-range, high damage, 30-turn reload Versions of all those special weapons that can be used on drones only. Problem solved 
__________________
It is forbidden to kill; therefore all murderers are punished unless they kill in large numbers and to the sound of trumpets. - Voltaire
|

December 4th, 2003, 07:41 PM
|
Lieutenant Colonel
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2000
Posts: 1,254
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Post 1.84 beta history
I think I found a bug (or, at least, I view it as a design flaw):
I am running a PBEM game. I log in Last night as the GM and process the turn. Haflway through the processing, up pops a modal window that says "Cannot mothball ships that are carrying cargo" This goes on four times (one for each cargo-carrying ship that was ordered to mothball)
Ok, I understand that, and I just hit OK until it stopped giving me the error and in the end it looks like the turn processed fine.
However, this would cause PBW games to hang, no? And shouldn't this warning just be put into the players event log rather than pop out at the GM processing level?
Thanks,
Alarik
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|