|
|
|
|
 |
December 5th, 2007, 06:28 AM
|
|
Corporal
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 67
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Fire and flee + SC = rout = crap
I set a bunch of archers to fire and flee along with an SC to mop things up.
The archers took no damage and retreated off the battlefield. As soon as they left my SC routed (he hadnt even got a hit in battle nor been hit nor been spelled with any fear etc). The only thing I could think is that thought I had "75% casualties" and thus automatic rout.
I think if a squad retreats off the battlefield due to "fire and flee" orders and otherwise does not fail a morale check then it should not be counted towards the casualty rate.
|
December 5th, 2007, 06:42 AM
|
|
Lieutenant General
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 2,691
Thanks: 5
Thanked 39 Times in 31 Posts
|
|
Re: Fire and flee + SC = rout = crap
you just shouldn't fire and flee then I guess 
__________________
Want a blend of fantasy and sci-fi? Try the total conversion Dominions 3000 mod with a new and fully modded solar system map.
Dragons wanted? Try the Dragons, Magic Incarnate nation.
New and different undead nation? Try Souls of Shiar. Including new powerfull holy magic.
In for a whole new sort of game? Then try my scenario map Gang Wars.
|
December 5th, 2007, 07:07 AM
|
 |
General
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: R'lyeh
Posts: 3,861
Thanks: 144
Thanked 403 Times in 176 Posts
|
|
Re: Fire and flee + SC = rout = crap
You know, I would have liked to see that Niefel Jarl NOT flee from battle. One blessmonster SC unit less on your side.
|
December 5th, 2007, 08:29 AM
|
|
BANNED USER
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 5,463
Thanks: 165
Thanked 324 Times in 190 Posts
|
|
Re: Fire and flee + SC = rout = crap
Fire and flee + anything = crap.
Hell, fire and flee = crap.
|
December 5th, 2007, 09:28 AM
|
 |
General
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Japan
Posts: 3,691
Thanks: 269
Thanked 397 Times in 200 Posts
|
|
Re: Fire and flee + SC = rout = crap
Banefire + flee = holy crap!
__________________
Whether he submitted the post, or whether he did not, made no difference. The Thought Police would get him just the same. He had committed— would still have committed, even if he had never set pen to paper— the essential crime that contained all others in itself. Thoughtcrime, they called it. Thoughtcrime was not a thing that could be concealed forever.
http://z7.invisionfree.com/Dom3mods/index.php?
|
December 5th, 2007, 03:25 PM
|
|
Corporal
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 67
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Fire and flee + SC = rout = crap
I'm not entirely convinced I would have lost. I'm pretty sure your drain life attack has to succeed an attack vs defense roll to hit (though its not obvious from the text). That's why I was so angry. Now you know what my SC looks like and can counter it better.
I was also angry how my other guy attacked your bloody scout. I am unlucky.
|
December 5th, 2007, 05:13 PM
|
|
First Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 792
Thanks: 28
Thanked 45 Times in 31 Posts
|
|
Re: Fire and flee + SC = rout = crap
If you're prepared to harry an opponent at the expense of territory, fire and flee might be very useful. If he wants to replace his losses, he's not able to move, if he wants to carry on coming, you can whittle his force down.
|
December 5th, 2007, 05:23 PM
|
|
Private
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 16
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Fire and flee + SC = rout = crap
I agree that a unit is supposed to intentionally flee should probably not cause a morale check. The work around is to use a golem as your SC or other SC that never flees a battle.
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
 Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|
Come to 
Visit my 
