|
|
|
|
|
May 2nd, 2010, 09:58 PM
|
Corporal
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 141
Thanks: 3
Thanked 7 Times in 6 Posts
|
|
Re: Reinstate Sombre
Would you care to provide a link, then?
|
May 2nd, 2010, 10:00 PM
|
Lieutenant General
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Alaska
Posts: 2,968
Thanks: 24
Thanked 221 Times in 46 Posts
|
|
Re: Reinstate Sombre
The details, as I understand them:
*Sombre made a post with a word that was swear filtered.
*Sombre got a 10 point infraction for it, and responded with '10 points? oh noes'.
*Sombre was banned.
At no point was there a temp ban, nor was there any current warning on him at the point of to post with a swear.
|
The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to quantum_mechani For This Useful Post:
|
|
May 2nd, 2010, 10:00 PM
|
|
General
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2000
Posts: 3,013
Thanks: 17
Thanked 25 Times in 22 Posts
|
|
Re: Reinstate Sombre
You could always look at his posting history, but there's no point, since the mods are perfect and wonderful. I swoon when I just think about them.
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Graeme Dice For This Useful Post:
|
|
May 2nd, 2010, 10:04 PM
|
|
Lieutenant Colonel
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Cary, NC, USA
Posts: 1,319
Thanks: 22
Thanked 51 Times in 38 Posts
|
|
Re: Reinstate Sombre
Absolutely, the details of the violations have not, and will not, be posted. And you're right,many assumptions have been made. I know the majority of those interested don't understand why we took the action we did, but I'm not going to share details that would help you decide whether you agree or disagree. It is what it is.
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Annette For This Useful Post:
|
|
May 2nd, 2010, 10:09 PM
|
BANNED USER
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Tacoma WA, USA
Posts: 1,314
Thanks: 103
Thanked 72 Times in 50 Posts
|
|
Re: Reinstate Sombre
Exactly as I said already. Oh well, glad we have these moderators...
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Trumanator For This Useful Post:
|
|
May 2nd, 2010, 10:15 PM
|
BANNED USER
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Seattle
Posts: 868
Thanks: 56
Thanked 42 Times in 33 Posts
|
|
Re: Reinstate Sombre
oh good. time for saving face.
is it worth mentioning another really good reason for not posting them? feels like a little bit of an excuse to me.
everyone knows that PR representatives are paid to lie to their consumers. glad to see that annette has the moral fiber to just flatly refuse
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Frozen Lama For This Useful Post:
|
|
May 2nd, 2010, 10:32 PM
|
|
Major General
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Tennessee USA
Posts: 2,059
Thanks: 229
Thanked 106 Times in 71 Posts
|
|
Re: Reinstate Sombre
Anymore, the guy was rude more often than helpful. Will suck to lose him, he did a lot for the community and at one time he was a very positive force on the forums (Beyond just mod contributions). Maybe he was bored and looking to get banned? Dominions has been around for a long time now, and he can still chat with people in IRC.
__________________
BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH NEXT TURN.
|
May 2nd, 2010, 10:42 PM
|
BANNED USER
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Alberta, Canada
Posts: 518
Thanks: 26
Thanked 55 Times in 29 Posts
|
|
Re: Reinstate Sombre
Irc Sucks!
|
May 2nd, 2010, 10:43 PM
|
|
Lieutenant Colonel
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Cary, NC, USA
Posts: 1,319
Thanks: 22
Thanked 51 Times in 38 Posts
|
|
Re: Reinstate Sombre
Good reason for not posting details: respect for privacy.
I'm locking this down. If anyone would like to continue this discussion, please refer to the section "Terms of Use" found in the link "Forum Rules".
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Annette For This Useful Post:
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|