|
|
|
Notices |
Do you own this game? Write a review and let others know how you like it.
|
|
|
June 30th, 2022, 01:52 AM
|
Major
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 1,152
Thanks: 325
Thanked 1,056 Times in 621 Posts
|
|
Re: Scenario reviews
The AI took the v hexes but kept moving to the right side of the map instead of holding the v hexes.
|
June 30th, 2022, 01:54 AM
|
Major
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 1,152
Thanks: 325
Thanked 1,056 Times in 621 Posts
|
|
Re: Scenario reviews
Scenario #393 The walls breached
Difficulty: Medium/hard
Size: Medium/large
Time: Medium/long
Playable from either side: No: AI leaves cover and tries to take Japanese held v hexes too soon.
Enjoyability: 4.5
|
June 30th, 2022, 05:13 AM
|
|
National Security Advisor
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Dundee
Posts: 5,955
Thanks: 464
Thanked 1,896 Times in 1,234 Posts
|
|
Re: Scenario reviews
Quote:
Originally Posted by RetLT
The AI took the v hexes but kept moving to the right side of the map instead of holding the v hexes.
|
The AI has no concept of holding V-hexes. So if it has taken all of them it simply advances onwards and tries to kill any remaining troops it finds (e.g. your artillery park).
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Mobhack For This Useful Post:
|
|
June 30th, 2022, 06:27 PM
|
|
Shrapnel Fanatic
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: GWN
Posts: 12,488
Thanks: 3,957
Thanked 5,691 Times in 2,811 Posts
|
|
Re: Scenario reviews
I thought you meant they didn't go for the V hexes. As Andy says after the V hexes are taken then the AI goes looking for enemy units to increase their points
|
The Following User Says Thank You to DRG For This Useful Post:
|
|
July 2nd, 2022, 08:27 PM
|
Major
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 1,152
Thanks: 325
Thanked 1,056 Times in 621 Posts
|
|
Re: Scenario reviews
Scenario #394 Maczek at Montbard
Difficulty: Medium/hard
Size: Medium/large
Time: Medium/long
Playable from either side: Yes: Easy as player 2
Enjoyability: 4.5
|
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to RetLT For This Useful Post:
|
|
July 2nd, 2022, 09:25 PM
|
|
National Security Advisor
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Dundee
Posts: 5,955
Thanks: 464
Thanked 1,896 Times in 1,234 Posts
|
|
Re: Scenario reviews
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mobhack
Quote:
Originally Posted by RetLT
The AI took the v hexes but kept moving to the right side of the map instead of holding the v hexes.
|
The AI has no concept of holding V-hexes. So if it has taken all of them it simply advances onwards and tries to kill any remaining troops it finds (e.g. your artillery park).
|
SP III did have some code to protect the V-hex cluster. It basically marched nearby infantry to the taken V-hexes, while vehicles still stormed ever-onwards.
That meant that if you let the AI take the clusters and waited a couple of turns before plastering them with artillery that you would have a field day killing the AI's grunts...
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Mobhack For This Useful Post:
|
|
July 3rd, 2022, 12:58 AM
|
|
Sergeant
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Die Operasionale Gebied
Posts: 373
Thanks: 102
Thanked 86 Times in 56 Posts
|
|
Re: Scenario reviews
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mobhack
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mobhack
Quote:
Originally Posted by RetLT
The AI took the v hexes but kept moving to the right side of the map instead of holding the v hexes.
|
The AI has no concept of holding V-hexes. So if it has taken all of them it simply advances onwards and tries to kill any remaining troops it finds (e.g. your artillery park).
|
SP III did have some code to protect the V-hex cluster. It basically marched nearby infantry to the taken V-hexes, while vehicles still stormed ever-onwards.
That meant that if you let the AI take the clusters and waited a couple of turns before plastering them with artillery that you would have a field day killing the AI's grunts...
|
It did that in SPWAW too. But we don't worry about that here.
troopie
__________________
Pamwe Chete
|
The Following User Says Thank You to troopie For This Useful Post:
|
|
July 5th, 2022, 11:40 PM
|
Major
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 1,152
Thanks: 325
Thanked 1,056 Times in 621 Posts
|
|
Re: Scenario reviews
Scenario #395 Gazala Line
Difficulty: Easy/medium
Size: Large/very large
Time: Very long
Playable from either side: Yes: Medium as player 2
Enjoyability: 4
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to RetLT For This Useful Post:
|
|
July 9th, 2022, 01:39 PM
|
Major
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 1,152
Thanks: 325
Thanked 1,056 Times in 621 Posts
|
|
Re: Scenario reviews
Scenario #396 Leninsky
Difficulty: Easy/medium
Size: Large
Time: Long
Playable from either side: Yes: Medium as player 2
Enjoyability: 4
|
The Following User Says Thank You to RetLT For This Useful Post:
|
|
July 17th, 2022, 09:34 PM
|
Major
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 1,152
Thanks: 325
Thanked 1,056 Times in 621 Posts
|
|
Re: Scenario reviews
Scenario #397 First tank desant
Difficulty: Easy/medium
Size: Small/medium
Time: Medium
Playable from either side: Yes: Easy/Medium as player 2
Enjoyability: 3
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to RetLT For This Useful Post:
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|