|
|
|
|
|
May 28th, 2003, 01:01 AM
|
Colonel
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Calgary, AB, Canada
Posts: 1,743
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
effectiveness of cloaking
ive been thinking (what a wonder! lol), is cloaking technology is useful? what i mean, does it worth to rush for it in the first like 70 turns of the game?
in one of my games, im generating enough research to reach the tech in .3 years... should i go for it? is it any good as such?
__________________
Let the game begin!
Green bug from outa space!
|
May 28th, 2003, 01:27 AM
|
Captain
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Australia
Posts: 809
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: effectiveness of cloaking
It all depends on your opponents.
If they only research Advanced Military 4 (or other Sensor tech), for the Ship Training and to stop the Stealth Armor - then YES.
|
May 28th, 2003, 01:30 AM
|
National Security Advisor
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2000
Posts: 5,085
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: effectiveness of cloaking
If on the other hand they do like me: Advanced Military 6, Sats 3 then sensor sats in every system..cloak is pretty much worthless.
EDIT: also, mines make cloaking difficult, since cloaked sweepers can't sweep! Basiclly if your opponent isn't using mines or doesn't have sensors, cloaking is useful. If he is, its not.
[ May 28, 2003, 00:31: Message edited by: Phoenix-D ]
__________________
Phoenix-D
I am not senile. I just talk to myself because the rest of you don't provide adequate conversation.
- Digger
|
May 28th, 2003, 01:55 AM
|
|
Lieutenant General
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Oxford, UK
Posts: 2,592
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: effectiveness of cloaking
You can get Stealth Armor VERY fast. Importantly, it is just a byproduct of usefull ship improvement. Unless your oppenent is Temporal/Psychic, he would had to invest much more research points into otherwise (kind of) useless research projects.
But after that... high level cloacking is indeed very expensive.
__________________
It is forbidden to kill; therefore all murderers are punished unless they kill in large numbers and to the sound of trumpets. - Voltaire
|
May 28th, 2003, 02:19 AM
|
|
Shrapnel Fanatic
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Southern CA, USA
Posts: 18,394
Thanks: 0
Thanked 12 Times in 10 Posts
|
|
Re: effectiveness of cloaking
Actually, Advanced Military Science is a very, very useful technology. Training your ships is vital. AMS is also very cheap. Researching it past 3 to level 6 to get Hyper Optics 3 is not very expensive at all.
Cloaking devices are almost never worth the investment.
|
May 28th, 2003, 08:46 PM
|
|
Sergeant
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Finland
Posts: 392
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: effectiveness of cloaking
I have been wondering following thing: Mines claim to stop level 5 active, passive, gravitic, temporal (was there one more?) scan. Is there any way to find out where the enemy minefield is besid ramming it (in PBW where intelligence is disabled)? I think not, but if someone knows a way, let me know...
__________________
If you give a man a fish, he will eat a day;
But if you teach a man to fish, he will buy an ugly hat;
And if you talk about a fish to a starving man, then you're a consultant
|
May 28th, 2003, 09:01 PM
|
|
Shrapnel Fanatic
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Waterloo, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 11,451
Thanks: 1
Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
|
|
Re: effectiveness of cloaking
Even with intel enabled, I don't think there is any real way to do it. Perhaps spying on ship/unit locations, but you'd have to get lucky and have the minefield picked randomly for the intel hit.
Just fly around some scout escorts ahead of your fleets, and carry some minesweepers with you.
__________________
Things you want:
|
May 28th, 2003, 09:29 PM
|
|
National Security Advisor
|
|
Join Date: Dec 1999
Posts: 8,806
Thanks: 54
Thanked 33 Times in 31 Posts
|
|
Re: effectiveness of cloaking
The other thing that makes cloaking more useless than necessary in the unmodded game is that once researched, high-level detection equipment doesn't even cost any more than low-level equipment, and has no maintenance costs. So making the higher-level detectors cost a lot more and not be placable on no-maintenance units would make it more likely that there would be some places for cloaking devices to be better than stealth armor.
PvK
|
May 28th, 2003, 09:41 PM
|
General
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Canada
Posts: 4,603
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: effectiveness of cloaking
i cannot remember will this work as a cloak...
Name := Passive EM Cloaking Device I
Description := Field generated around a starship which passes all energy around the ship. This field has the effect of rendering the ship invisible.
Pic Num := 237
Tonnage Space Taken := 40
Tonnage Structure := 40
Cost Minerals := 500
Cost Organics := 0
Cost Radioactives := 1000
Vehicle Type := Ship\Base\Sat\Drone
Supply Amount Used := 100
Restrictions := None
General Group := Cloaking
Family := 600
Roman Numeral := 1
Custom Group := 0
Number of Tech Req := 1
Tech Area Req 1 := Cloaking
Tech Level Req 1 := 1
Number of Abilities := 1
Ability 1 Type := Cloak Level
Ability 1 Descr := Prevents level 1 Passive EM scans.
Ability 1 Val 1 := EM Passive
Ability 1 Val 2 := 2
Weapon Type := None
or do you have to include all the other cloak abilities...
__________________
RRRRRRRRRRAAAAAGGGGGGGGGHHHHH
old avatar = http://www.shrapnelgames.com/cgi-bin...1051567998.jpg
Hey GUTB where did you go...???
He is still driving his mighty armada at 3 miles per month along the interstellar highway bypass and will be arriving shortly
|
May 28th, 2003, 10:06 PM
|
|
Sergeant
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Finland
Posts: 392
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: effectiveness of cloaking
Only cloack I ever use is Stealth armor and that is only because of its ECM bonus. Well, not only, because it grants invicibility if enemy does not have experience enought to have scanners of any kind. I agree that cloacking device is worthless, because all scanners are so cheap to get.
I have never been able to find out any minefield beside ramming/sweeping them. At the moment it is balanced, because you can sweep them easily after you find them, but you must have sweeper with you all the time.
There should be some alternative to it. One scanner to counter one kind of cloacking. For example: inertial nullifier would counter gravitic scanner, Electromagnetic circulator (would turn any EM signals toward ships instead of sending them away) to counter Hyper Optics, etc.
In practice, you would have to had all kind of scanners to counter all kind of cloacking. Well, Ihaven't thought this through to the end yet, but you get the idea. Also, cloacking should include some percentage to be ineffective against a scanner of certain level (MOO3).
__________________
If you give a man a fish, he will eat a day;
But if you teach a man to fish, he will buy an ugly hat;
And if you talk about a fish to a starving man, then you're a consultant
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|