|  | 
| 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
    
    
 |  | 
 
 
	
		|  |  |  
	
	
		
	
	
	| 
			
			 
			
				May 11th, 2004, 08:45 PM
			
			
			
		 |  
	| 
		
			|  | 
 First Lieutenant |  | 
					Join Date: Mar 2004 Location: CA 
						Posts: 744
					 Thanks: 0 
		
			Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
		
	      |  |  
    
	| 
				 Possible bug with lifedrain attacks? - developers please read 
 Greetings.
 
 I've noticed recently strange behaiver of lifedrain-type attacks against mirror-imaged targets.
 
 For expample when ID wielding lifedrain weapon attacked my mirror shielded Air Queeen, he would not be able to hit her due to mirror images and high defense.
 
 However with _every_ swing of his life-draiing sword he did add big chunk of fatique to her, despite being unable to actually hit her. In just few turns she went over 100 fatique, than to 200, and than he killed her.
 
 I don't think this is the way lifedrain attack supposed to work, correct? I mean, if you are unable to hit the target, much less cause actual damage to it (AQ was always in full hitpoints and kept her mirrorimages until she went over 200 fatique), than how do you suppose to lifedrain the target with your weapons?
 
 Somebody told me once that according to developers lifedrain supposed to give you some fixed percentages of damage inflicted on the target as hitpoints and fatique gains. (don't remeber excact numbers)
 
 If this is the case, than it is certanly currently buged, since no damage was inflicted in my example, but fatique was gained/inflicted nevertheless.
 
 
 This is not the only similar observation. Norfleet alose reported that he had the same situation when he encountered bunch of vampires with his VQ. Their attacks immideatly caused VQ  to went over 100 fatique, despite the fact that they could not actuially hit her and she was still mirror-imaged.
 
 
 I would really appreciate some commants from developers regarding this situations.
 
 
 Also does anybody know how exactly lifedrain type attack supposed to work, and how it is actually currently working? According to death-specialist Norfleet neither MR, not protection(?) help against lifedrain attacks, at least from fatique-loss point of view. He said he doesn't know if defense helps against it. Any comments?
 
 [ May 11, 2004, 19:47: Message edited by: Stormbinder ]
 
			
			
			
			
				  |  
	
		
	
	
	| 
			
			 
			
				May 13th, 2004, 03:22 AM
			
			
			
		 |  
	| 
		
			|  | 
 First Lieutenant |  | 
					Join Date: Mar 2004 Location: CA 
						Posts: 744
					 Thanks: 0 
		
			Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
		
	      |  |  
    
	| 
				 Re: Possible bug with lifedrain attacks? - developers please read 
 Bump to the top |  
	
		
	
	
	| 
			
			 
			
				May 13th, 2004, 02:07 PM
			
			
			
		 |  
	| 
		
			
			| 
 Second Lieutenant |  | 
					Join Date: Dec 2003 
						Posts: 404
					 Thanks: 0 
		
			Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
		
	      |  |  
    
	| 
				 Re: Possible bug with lifedrain attacks? - developers please read 
 This is from a developer post:"A life drain attack regains damage*2 fatigue and damage/2 HP. It also causes damage/2 extra fatigue on the target. Only lifeless units are immune."
 
 That it bypasses mirror images and/or defence very much sounds like a bug though.
 |  
	
		
	
	
	| 
			
			 
			
				May 13th, 2004, 02:15 PM
			
			
			
		 |  
	| 
		
			
			| 
 Second Lieutenant |  | 
					Join Date: Nov 2003 Location: houston TX 
						Posts: 493
					 Thanks: 32 
		
			Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
		
	      |  |  
    
	| 
				 Re: Possible bug with lifedrain attacks? - developers please read 
 
	I was under the impression that undead couldn't generally drain one another, though most of them do not have the "lifeless" tag.Quote: 
	
		| Originally posted by mivayan: This is from a developer post:
 "A life drain attack regains damage*2 fatigue and damage/2 HP. It also causes damage/2 extra fatigue on the target. Only lifeless units are immune."
 |  
 Could someone clarify?
 
 Thanks,
 
 Rabe the Golem Groupie
 |  
	
		
	
	
	| 
			
			 
			
				May 13th, 2004, 04:26 PM
			
			
			
		 |  
	| 
		
			|  | 
 Lieutenant General |  | 
					Join Date: Feb 2004 
						Posts: 2,687
					 Thanks: 20 
		
			
				Thanked 54 Times in 39 Posts
			
		
	      |  |  
    
	| 
				 Re: Possible bug with lifedrain attacks? - developers please read 
 yah, it seems such attacks inflict fatigue loss whatever the result of the rest of the attack.  this seems overpowered, but may or may not be a bug. 
However, zen told me when I inquired that nothing, even a lifeless unit, is immune to these attacks.  That would, at the very least, seem to be a bug then.
 
It also makes carrion woods rather difficult to deal w/    |  
	
		
	
	
	| 
			
			 
			
				May 13th, 2004, 04:37 PM
			
			
			
		 |  
	| 
		
			|  | 
 General |  | 
					Join Date: Aug 2003 Location: Sweden 
						Posts: 4,463
					 Thanks: 25 
		
			
				Thanked 92 Times in 43 Posts
			
		
	      |  |  
    
	| 
				 Re: Possible bug with lifedrain attacks? - developers please read 
 It may be that life drain deals damage to all, but you are only reinvigourated if the target is not lifeless IIRC. This is at least true for wraith sword and similar weapons.
 Fatigue for free sounds suspiciously buglike.
 |  
	
		
	
	
	| 
			
			 
			
				May 13th, 2004, 04:42 PM
			
			
			
		 |  
	| 
		
			|  | 
 Lieutenant General |  | 
					Join Date: Feb 2004 
						Posts: 2,687
					 Thanks: 20 
		
			
				Thanked 54 Times in 39 Posts
			
		
	      |  |  
    
	| 
				 Re: Possible bug with lifedrain attacks? - developers please read 
 you aren't reinvigorated (using a wraithsword, for ex.) against undead either, though the attack will still cause damage to them.  This seems correct to me - the auto attack success is wierd, though, as well as lifeless units taking fatigue (I haven't checked this personally - just going on what Zen said). |  
	
		
	
	
	| 
			
			 
			
				May 13th, 2004, 04:57 PM
			
			
			
		 |  
	| 
		
			
			| 
 Corporal |  | 
					Join Date: Mar 2004 
						Posts: 123
					 Thanks: 0 
		
			
				Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
			
		
	      |  |  
    
	| 
				 Re: Possible bug with lifedrain attacks? - developers please read 
 This is from the   VQ Counters  - NO debate 
Where both Zen and Norfleet confirm that lifedrain attacks inflict fatique on their targets without hitting .
 
The feelings expressed there seemed to be that it was an SC balance decision, and not a bug...
 
EDIT:  Just clarifying that if this is in fact a "bug", that fixing it may in fact make SC's invulnerable, so tread carefully
 
 [ May 13, 2004, 16:00: Message edited by: AhhhFresh ] |  
	
		
	
	
	| 
			
			 
			
				May 13th, 2004, 06:42 PM
			
			
			
		 |  
	| 
		
			
			| 
 Major General |  | 
					Join Date: Jan 2004 
						Posts: 2,425
					 Thanks: 0 
		
			
				Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
			
		
	      |  |  
    
	| 
				 Re: Possible bug with lifedrain attacks? - developers please read 
 Zen says that the fatigue is inflicted regardless of whether the attack penetrates protection: It's possible that the attack "hits", but doesn't inflict any damage through protection, but the fatigue is caused anyway. Since no physical damage is caused, mirror image doesn't fail. |  
	
		
	
	
	| 
			
			 
			
				May 13th, 2004, 06:48 PM
			
			
			
		 |  
	|  |  
    
	| 
				 Re: Possible bug with lifedrain attacks? - developers please read 
 
	This is also true of anything that has a secondary effect but doesn't deal any actual damage.  Though it may or may not be on the same level as Life Drain.  Meaning, a weapon that has a secondary effect of poisoning, that doesn't actually hit through protection can still poison if the unit is not immune to poison.  Same with things that have effects like "Tangle Vine".  Some effects (Can't remember off the top of my head) require damage before they are applied AFAIK but Life Drain and numerous weapons with secondary effects do not.Quote: 
	
		| Originally posted by Norfleet: Zen says that the fatigue is inflicted regardless of whether the attack penetrates protection: It's possible that the attack "hits", but doesn't inflict any damage through protection, but the fatigue is caused anyway. Since no physical damage is caused, mirror image doesn't fail.
 |  |  
	
		
	
	
	
	
	
	
	| 
	|  Posting Rules |  
	| 
		
		You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts 
 HTML code is On 
 |  |  |  |  |