|
|
|
|
 |
|
July 29th, 2005, 07:48 PM
|
 |
Lieutenant Colonel
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: DC Burbs USA
Posts: 1,460
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
|
Re: Article about SEV on Gamespot!
Quote:
Ed Kolis said:
WOOOOT! New screenies! 
Now that combat screenshot looks impressive... especially with the FPS rating and resolution! I wonder what video card that one came from... 
|
Well, I can't wait! I got a new FX57 and a set of SLI'd 7800 just waiting to show me what this game has to offer 
__________________
Think about it
|
July 29th, 2005, 09:49 PM
|
 |
Shrapnel Fanatic
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: CHEESE!
Posts: 10,009
Thanks: 0
Thanked 7 Times in 1 Post
|
|
Re: Article about SEV on Gamespot!
Quote:
Imperator Fyron said:
Phoenix-D said:
I'm betting "crappy article".
There is no way in hell that I will take you up on that bet, good sir.
|
* Notes that Fyron is a beta tester.
__________________
If I only could remember half the things I'd forgot, that would be a lot of stuff, I think - I don't know; I forgot!
A* E* Se! Gd! $-- C-^- Ai** M-- S? Ss---- RA Pw? Fq Bb++@ Tcp? L++++
Some of my webcomics. I've got 400+ webcomics at Last count, some dead.
Sig updated to remove non-working links.
|
July 29th, 2005, 11:45 PM
|
 |
Shrapnel Fanatic
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Southern CA, USA
Posts: 18,394
Thanks: 0
Thanked 12 Times in 10 Posts
|
|
Re: Article about SEV on Gamespot!
Erm... it was commentary about Gamespot, especially in relation to non-clickfest/keyfest style games.
|
July 30th, 2005, 03:35 AM
|
 |
Brigadier General
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Kailua, Hawaii
Posts: 1,860
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
|
Re: Article about SEV on Gamespot!
Them EEE are fugly, aren't they?!!!
(fugly is a few levels worse than ugly)
edit: not ugly as in bad artwork, just ugly as in I don't wanna meet them unless I'm packing some heat.
__________________
Slick.
|
July 30th, 2005, 05:41 AM
|
 |
Major General
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Germany / Bielefeld
Posts: 2,035
Thanks: 33
Thanked 18 Times in 12 Posts
|
|
Re: Article about SEV on Gamespot!
well in SE4 the Eee looked friendly, but now they seem like some metastastic slime balls. I like them even more now !!!!!!111oneone
|
July 30th, 2005, 09:14 AM
|
 |
Corporal
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: England
Posts: 155
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Article about SEV on Gamespot!
The graphics are nothing to shout about, lets be honest.It's the gameplay that SE is all about, and we need some info about SE5 gameplay.
|
July 30th, 2005, 10:03 AM
|
 |
Shrapnel Fanatic
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: USA
Posts: 15,630
Thanks: 0
Thanked 30 Times in 18 Posts
|
|
Re: Article about SEV on Gamespot!
Well that was an interesting read. I wish I could comment on some specifics, but NDA is quite clear. I can say there were things mentioned in the article that I didn't even know about. So woooooo whoooooo! When's this game coming out any ways?
__________________
Creator of the Star Trek Mod - AST Mod - 78 Ship Sets - Conquest Mod - Atrocities Star Wars Mod - Galaxy Reborn Mod - and Subterfuge Mod.
|
July 30th, 2005, 10:11 AM
|
 |
Major General
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: In your mind.
Posts: 2,241
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Article about SEV on Gamespot!
Hmm, with the EEE gone Metroid, will we be able to hire bounty hunters in SEV? 
__________________
O'Neill: I have something I want to confess you. The name's not Kirk. It's Skywalker. Luke Skywalker.
-Stargate SG1
|
July 30th, 2005, 10:41 AM
|
 |
National Security Advisor
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 5,624
Thanks: 1
Thanked 14 Times in 12 Posts
|
|
Re: Article about SEV on Gamespot!
Despite some strangeness/inaccuracies in the article, it's still publicity. |
July 30th, 2005, 11:42 AM
|
 |
First Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Toledo, OH
Posts: 641
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Article about SEV on Gamespot!
I don't like the mouse pointer. It's huge!
__________________
Assume you have a 1kg squirrel
E=mc^2
E=1kg(3x10^8m/s)^2=9x10^16J
which, if I'm not mistaken, is equivilent to roughly a 50 megaton nuclear bomb.
Fear the squirrel.
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|
Linear Mode
