|  | 
| 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
    
    
 |  | 
 
 
	
		|  |  |  
	
	
		
	
	
	| 
			
			 
			
				March 30th, 2006, 05:53 AM
			
			
			
		 |  
	| 
		
			
			| 
 Private |  | 
					Join Date: Jan 2006 
						Posts: 25
					 Thanks: 2 
		
			
				Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
			
		
	      |  |  
    
	| 
				 Re: Worst defense value ever? 
 No, I'd have thought the stone bird would have killed some more of those longdead - seemed a little buggy to me.. |  
	
		
	
	
	| 
			
			 
			
				March 31st, 2006, 12:42 AM
			
			
			
		 |  
	| 
		
			
			| 
 Sergeant |  | 
					Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Canada 
						Posts: 362
					 Thanks: 1 
		
			
				Thanked 9 Times in 7 Posts
			
		
	      |  |  
    
	| 
				 Re: Worst defense value ever? 
 my thinking was the reduced action points from monolith stopped the many stone bird attacks?
 noone has really been able to give me a concrete answer on action points effecting attacks.
 |  
	
		
	
	
	| 
			
			 
			
				March 31st, 2006, 03:29 AM
			
			
			
		 |  
	| 
		
			
			| 
 Lieutenant General |  | 
					Join Date: Dec 2003 Location: Alaska 
						Posts: 2,968
					 Thanks: 24 
		
			
				Thanked 221 Times in 46 Posts
			
		
	      |  |  
    
	| 
				 Re: Worst defense value ever? 
 
	Quote: 
	
		| Peacekeeper said: noone has really been able to give me a concrete answer on action points effecting attacks.
 
 |  It doesn't.
 
EDIT: Except with trample.   |  
	
		
	
	
	| 
			
			 
			
				March 31st, 2006, 04:20 AM
			
			
			
		 |  
	| 
		
			
			| 
 Sergeant |  | 
					Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Canada 
						Posts: 362
					 Thanks: 1 
		
			
				Thanked 9 Times in 7 Posts
			
		
	      |  |  
    
	| 
				 Re: Worst defense value ever? 
 thank you =) |  
	
		
	
	
	| 
			
			 
			
				March 31st, 2006, 10:15 PM
			
			
			
		 |  
	| 
		
			|  | 
 Major |  | 
					Join Date: Aug 2004 Location: Salt Lake City 
						Posts: 1,032
					 Thanks: 0 
		
			Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
		
	      |  |  
    
	| 
				 Eat it, Aella 
 All i can say is... equip ligtning rings to your commanders. 250 ghouls, a couple banelords, and about 30 vine ogres were worth the victory.  |  
	
		
	
	
	| 
			
			 
			
				April 1st, 2006, 12:26 AM
			
			
			
		 |  
	| 
		
			
			| 
 Private |  | 
					Join Date: Apr 2005 
						Posts: 5
					 Thanks: 0 
		
			
				Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
			
		
	      |  |  
    
	| 
				 Re: New Noob Game 
 If you aren't full, I'd like to play Jotunheim. |  
	
		
	
	
	| 
			
			 
			
				April 1st, 2006, 12:43 AM
			
			
			
		 |  
	| 
		
			
			| 
 Sergeant |  | 
					Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Canada 
						Posts: 362
					 Thanks: 1 
		
			
				Thanked 9 Times in 7 Posts
			
		
	      |  |  
    
	| 
				 Re: New Noob Game 
 you sure your in the right thread extra? this game is on turn 50 something. |  
	
		
	
	
	| 
			
			 
			
				April 1st, 2006, 09:50 AM
			
			
			
		 |  
	| 
		
			|  | 
 Second Lieutenant |  | 
					Join Date: Jan 2004 
						Posts: 590
					 Thanks: 0 
		
			
				Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
			
		
	      |  |  
    
	| 
				 Re: New Noob Game 
 Roflmao. I'll take Caelum. |  
	
		
	
	
	| 
			
			 
			
				April 1st, 2006, 09:58 AM
			
			
			
		 |  
	| 
		
			
			| 
 Colonel |  | 
					Join Date: Aug 2005 
						Posts: 1,606
					 Thanks: 0 
		
			
				Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
			
		
	      |  |  
    
	| 
				 Re: New Noob Game 
 
	Quote: 
	
		| OG_Gleep said: Roflmao. I'll take Caelum.
 
 |  not funny... |  
	
		
	
	
	| 
			
			 
			
				April 2nd, 2006, 01:51 AM
			
			
			
		 |  
	| 
		
			|  | 
 Second Lieutenant |  | 
					Join Date: Jan 2004 
						Posts: 590
					 Thanks: 0 
		
			
				Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
			
		
	      |  |  
    
	| 
				 Re: New Noob Game 
 If you were in this game, you'd want caleum too. |  
	
		
	
	
	
	
	
	
	| 
	|  Posting Rules |  
	| 
		
		You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts 
 HTML code is On 
 |  |  |  |  |