|
|
|
|
 |
|
September 19th, 2006, 12:28 PM
|
 |
Shrapnel Fanatic
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: CHEESE!
Posts: 10,009
Thanks: 0
Thanked 7 Times in 1 Post
|
|
Re: OT: Stupid c++
Anybody want to volunteer to look at the code?
__________________
If I only could remember half the things I'd forgot, that would be a lot of stuff, I think - I don't know; I forgot!
A* E* Se! Gd! $-- C-^- Ai** M-- S? Ss---- RA Pw? Fq Bb++@ Tcp? L++++
Some of my webcomics. I've got 400+ webcomics at Last count, some dead.
Sig updated to remove non-working links.
|
September 19th, 2006, 04:30 PM
|
 |
General
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
Posts: 4,547
Thanks: 1
Thanked 7 Times in 5 Posts
|
|
Re: OT: Stupid c++
Sure, though I'm not that great with C++, I might be able to spot something...
__________________
The Ed draws near! What dost thou deaux?
|
September 19th, 2006, 05:23 PM
|
 |
National Security Advisor
|
|
Join Date: Dec 1999
Posts: 8,806
Thanks: 54
Thanked 33 Times in 31 Posts
|
|
Re: OT: Stupid c++ (Roguelike development)
Why would new re-assign what same pointers?
|
September 19th, 2006, 05:49 PM
|
 |
Shrapnel Fanatic
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Southern CA, USA
Posts: 18,394
Thanks: 0
Thanked 12 Times in 10 Posts
|
|
Re: OT: Stupid c++
And now it isn't even getting past re-sizing the character array.
Why are you using character arrays at all? There is no reason to ever use them over string. Any time you need to pass a char* to a function, just use the .c_str() member on your string (aka: crazy_function(mystring.c_str()).
C++ is stupid.
C++ is neither stupid nor smart. It all depends on how you use it.
Why would the 'new' operator re-assign the same pointers?
I don't understand the question. New doesn't assign any pointers; it creates an object in the dynamic memory space (heap), and returns a pointer to it.
|
September 19th, 2006, 06:04 PM
|
|
Shrapnel Fanatic
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: CHEESE!
Posts: 10,009
Thanks: 0
Thanked 7 Times in 1 Post
|
|
Re: OT: Stupid c++
By character array, I mean an array of NPC's and PC's. And technically I should have said 'vector'.
C++ needs more comprehensive error checking.
Tomato, tomato.
Anyone who wants to see the source code, PM me, thanks.
__________________
If I only could remember half the things I'd forgot, that would be a lot of stuff, I think - I don't know; I forgot!
A* E* Se! Gd! $-- C-^- Ai** M-- S? Ss---- RA Pw? Fq Bb++@ Tcp? L++++
Some of my webcomics. I've got 400+ webcomics at Last count, some dead.
Sig updated to remove non-working links.
|
September 19th, 2006, 06:39 PM
|
|
Shrapnel Fanatic
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Southern CA, USA
Posts: 18,394
Thanks: 0
Thanked 12 Times in 10 Posts
|
|
Re: OT: Stupid c++
C++ compilers have more error checking than most other languages (esp. g++ with things like -pedantic flags). And anyways, you can always add more by throwing and catching exceptions.
|
September 19th, 2006, 07:53 PM
|
|
Shrapnel Fanatic
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: CHEESE!
Posts: 10,009
Thanks: 0
Thanked 7 Times in 1 Post
|
|
Re: OT: Stupid c++
It doesn't tell me why the resize function wasn't working on the character vector! Obviously, it's not fully-featured! 
__________________
If I only could remember half the things I'd forgot, that would be a lot of stuff, I think - I don't know; I forgot!
A* E* Se! Gd! $-- C-^- Ai** M-- S? Ss---- RA Pw? Fq Bb++@ Tcp? L++++
Some of my webcomics. I've got 400+ webcomics at Last count, some dead.
Sig updated to remove non-working links.
|
September 19th, 2006, 08:22 PM
|
|
Shrapnel Fanatic
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Southern CA, USA
Posts: 18,394
Thanks: 0
Thanked 12 Times in 10 Posts
|
|
Re: OT: Stupid c++
Why are you using a resize function anyways? push_back() works well.
|
September 19th, 2006, 08:25 PM
|
|
Shrapnel Fanatic
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: CHEESE!
Posts: 10,009
Thanks: 0
Thanked 7 Times in 1 Post
|
|
Re: OT: Stupid c++
Because, with resize you don't have to push_back something.
__________________
If I only could remember half the things I'd forgot, that would be a lot of stuff, I think - I don't know; I forgot!
A* E* Se! Gd! $-- C-^- Ai** M-- S? Ss---- RA Pw? Fq Bb++@ Tcp? L++++
Some of my webcomics. I've got 400+ webcomics at Last count, some dead.
Sig updated to remove non-working links.
|
September 19th, 2006, 08:36 PM
|
|
Shrapnel Fanatic
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Southern CA, USA
Posts: 18,394
Thanks: 0
Thanked 12 Times in 10 Posts
|
|
Re: OT: Stupid c++
Why would you increase the size of a vector without having something to add to it?
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|
Linear Mode
