1.08 bugs. - Page 10

Dizzy · #91 October 26th, 2006, 08:55 PM

Yup, I guess that's why mb im not getting supplied. Mb you have to be friends 1st and supplied later. Be nice if someone could confirm.

Shadowstar · #92 October 27th, 2006, 02:45 AM

Hopefully MM will fix it by forcing a default setting for every treaty heading. This should also improve AI.

I took the opportunity to listen in on the AI's diplomacy using political espionage and watched a neutral empire repeatedly send treaty proposals to another AI empire for 6 turns in a row. Political espionage does give you some interesting views of just what the AI's are doing with each other behind the scenes, although that usually amounts to something akin to spying on a room full of monkeys.

Is it too soon for another UN reference?

Yimboli · #93 October 27th, 2006, 11:26 AM

Quote:

Shadowstar said:
Political espionage does give you some interesting views of just what the AI's are doing with each other behind the scenes, although that usually amounts to something akin to spying on a room full of monkeys.

Moriarty · #94 October 27th, 2006, 11:55 AM

Shadowstar:

Quote:

Phoenix-D said:
34) isn't a bug. SE5 just doesn't tell you combat speed. For ships that doesn't matter because its the same; fighters work a little bit differently..

So what does the "21, 21" on the ship design represet then? I thought it was space and ground combat speeds.

Not to mention - fighters can't fly anywhere OTHER than in combat (be it ground or space), so there's no point showing star-system speed.
Thus I'm going to stick to my guns and call it a bug. At the very least if it's intended then it's poor design. :-/

Phoenix-D · #95 October 27th, 2006, 02:04 PM

It is. Space (strategic) and ground movement (tactical). Fighters CAN fly in-system, by the way. Don't ask me why combat space movement isn't in there I don't know either.

StarJack · #96 October 27th, 2006, 02:46 PM

Quote:

Shadowstar said:
Political espionage does give you some interesting views of just what the AI's are doing with each other behind the scenes, although that usually amounts to something akin to spying on a room full of monkeys. Is it too soon for another UN reference?

That's funny, and no it's not, though rabid monkeys might be more appropriate.

Baal · #97 October 27th, 2006, 04:29 PM

I didn't find this in the history.txt for 1.08 so here it is. If I an AI uses intelligence to destroy a research project I am doing it makes the research project take an insurmountable amount of time. On further inspection when I clicked the "Research Spent" option to see how much I had spent on various other fields it showed that I had spent "-9,995,234" research in that field.

The destroyed research project was going to take 10 million research points just to dig it out of the hole to get to the next level.

Caduceus · #98 October 27th, 2006, 04:34 PM

I hope that -10M research points is a bug that will be fixed - i.e. set to 0 from whatever you had researched so far. -10M essentially means abandoning the project forever.

Raapys · #99 October 27th, 2006, 04:44 PM

I've had the enemy destroy my research projects several times, without it actually having *any* effect. They'd still finish right on time. Funny game.

Captain Kwok · #**100** October 27th, 2006, 04:57 PM

Quote:

Raapys said:
I've had the enemy destroy my research projects several times, without it actually having *any* effect. They'd still finish right on time. Funny game.

Is that in the Balance Mod though? I have it only subtract 5000 points so you might not even notice depending on how many points you're making. Perhaps I should make it ~25% of the project cost instead?