|  | 
| 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
    
    
 |  | 
 
 
	
		|  |  |  
	
	
		
	
	
	| 
			
			 
			
				October 28th, 2006, 04:03 AM
			
			
			
		 |  
	| 
		
			|  | 
 Lieutenant General |  | 
					Join Date: Sep 2003 Location: Hyvinkää, Finland 
						Posts: 2,703
					 Thanks: 0 
		
			Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
		
	      |  |  
    
	| 
				 Re: Eater of the Dead 
 
	Quote: 
	
		| quantum_mechani said: 
 
	It can't, and it's not likely to be changed.Quote: 
	
		| Nerfix said: I wonder if the Unfettered can move around on it's own...
 
 |  
 |  Saddness, what's the point of it then?  
				__________________  
"Boobs are OK. Just not for Nerfix [img]/threads/images/Graemlins/Smile.gif[/img] ." 
- Kristoffer O.
			 |  
	
		
	
	
	| 
			
			 
			
				October 28th, 2006, 04:14 AM
			
			
			
		 |  
	| 
		
			
			| 
 Lieutenant General |  | 
					Join Date: Dec 2003 Location: Alaska 
						Posts: 2,968
					 Thanks: 24 
		
			
				Thanked 221 Times in 46 Posts
			
		
	      |  |  
    
	| 
				 Re: Eater of the Dead 
 
	Quote: 
	
		| Nerfix said: 
 
	Saddness, what's the point of it then?Quote: 
	
		| quantum_mechani said: 
 
	It can't, and it's not likely to be changed.Quote: 
	
		| Nerfix said: I wonder if the Unfettered can move around on it's own...
 
 |  
 |    
 |  Well, if the unfettered stage were as uber as it should be, I imagine parking it on the enemy capital or likewise importent province could have some effect. |  
	
		
	
	
	| 
			
			 
			
				October 28th, 2006, 07:40 AM
			
			
			
		 |  
	| 
		
			|  | 
 National Security Advisor |  | 
					Join Date: Sep 2003 Location: Eastern Finland 
						Posts: 7,110
					 Thanks: 145 
		
			
				Thanked 153 Times in 101 Posts
			
		
	      |  |  
    
	| 
				 Re: Eater of the Dead 
 Huge number of attacks won't work because creatures can't attack multiple provinces without Quickness. However, AoE attacks would work. AoE life-draining attack would be NASTY! |  
	
		
	
	
	| 
			
			 
			
				October 28th, 2006, 10:56 AM
			
			
			
		 |  
	| 
		
			
			| 
 Brigadier General |  | 
					Join Date: Oct 2006 Location: Northern Ireland 
						Posts: 1,923
					 Thanks: 2 
		
			
				Thanked 5 Times in 5 Posts
			
		
	      |  |  
    
	| 
				 Re: Eater of the Dead 
 Im guessing by multiple provincesyou mean squares   . And i know they can only attack one square, thats why he needs big fear, a nasty aura and possibly a damage shield. |  
	
		
	
	
	| 
			
			 
			
				October 28th, 2006, 12:05 PM
			
			
			
		 |  
	|  |  
    
	| 
				 Re: Eater of the Dead 
 
	Quote: 
	
		| quantum_mechani said:Still, such things are pretty rare (particularly for a specific spell) and are unlikely to have the same impact on a game as being able to spend astrals on eater of the dead vs. if you had no other astral summons. 
 |  I don't think even that counts for the Eater. Before i'd summon an Eater for 50 gems i'd turn them into 25 death gems and get two Banelords or 50 longdead horsemen or heck, 2.5 behemoths. If you can summon the Eater, you can summon all of those as well. 
I think it's a pretty good hint that a summon is really, terribly weak if you can alchemize the gems it needs and get something much better for them. 
Ritual and non-ritual spells are hard to compare, but i say the eater of the dead is hands down the worst summon in the game and very likely the worst ritual.
 
That being said, the stealth idea is pretty good imo. Make the eater stronger at independent size (give it some more HP, and better regeneration, poison cloud etc. basically a natural thug if not SC) make it stealthy (and still grow) and reduce costs to 15 or maybe even ten. So, compared to ghost riders it has the disadvantage that you can't artillery cast it, and it needs to grow a lot before it has comparable strenght, but the advantage is that it stays in a province and needs to be killed to regain control. (and you could use it in an army too. Theoretically) Imo that'd be a lot more interesting than just turning it into a cost efficient standard summon. It'd be fun to have some kind of near-unstoppable rampaging monster you first feed up to decent size, then let it sneak into the midsts of enemy territory and let it loose.
			
			
			
			
				  |  
	
		
	
	
	| 
			
			 
			
				October 28th, 2006, 06:14 PM
			
			
			
		 |  
	| 
		
			|  | 
 Corporal |  | 
					Join Date: May 2004 Location: Ohio 
						Posts: 133
					 Thanks: 2 
		
			
				Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
			
		
	      |  |  
    
	| 
				 Re: Eater of the Dead 
 I definately like the idea of adding stealth and making it spawn additional eaters when it becomes unfettered.  As far as I'm concerned, the nastier the thing is, the better!     Hopefully CB will make the eater properly fearsome. |  
	
		
	
	
	| 
			
			 
			
				October 28th, 2006, 11:16 PM
			
			
			
		 |  
	| 
		
			
			| 
 BANNED USER |  | 
					Join Date: Oct 2003 
						Posts: 194
					 Thanks: 0 
		
			
				Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
			
		
	      |  |  
    
	| 
				 Re: Eater of the Dead 
 I would love to see the eater of the dead start off like it does now and grow to insane power levels after eating enough and breaking free. |  
	
		
	
	
	| 
			
			 
			
				October 28th, 2006, 11:57 PM
			
			
			
		 |  
	| 
		
			|  | 
 Major |  | 
					Join Date: Jan 2006 
						Posts: 1,055
					 Thanks: 4 
		
			
				Thanked 29 Times in 13 Posts
			
		
	      |  |  
    
	| 
				 Re: Eater of the Dead 
 
	Quote: 
	
		| Dhaeron said: 
 
	I don't think even that counts for the Eater. Before i'd summon an Eater for 50 gems i'd turn them into 25 death gems and get two Banelords or 50 longdead horsemen or heck, 2.5 behemoths. If you can summon the Eater, you can summon all of those as well.Quote: 
	
		| quantum_mechani said:Still, such things are pretty rare (particularly for a specific spell) and are unlikely to have the same impact on a game as being able to spend astrals on eater of the dead vs. if you had no other astral summons. 
 |  I think it's a pretty good hint that a summon is really, terribly weak if you can alchemize the gems it needs and get something much better for them.
 Ritual and non-ritual spells are hard to compare, but i say the eater of the dead is hands down the worst summon in the game and very likely the worst ritual.
 
 That being said, the stealth idea is pretty good imo. Make the eater stronger at independent size (give it some more HP, and better regeneration, poison cloud etc. basically a natural thug if not SC) make it stealthy (and still grow) and reduce costs to 15 or maybe even ten. So, compared to ghost riders it has the disadvantage that you can't artillery cast it, and it needs to grow a lot before it has comparable strenght, but the advantage is that it stays in a province and needs to be killed to regain control. (and you could use it in an army too. Theoretically) Imo that'd be a lot more interesting than just turning it into a cost efficient standard summon. It'd be fun to have some kind of near-unstoppable rampaging monster you first feed up to decent size, then let it sneak into the midsts of enemy territory and let it loose.
 
 |  The eater is stronger than two banelords, 50 horsies or 2.5 behemoths.  This I guarantee you. |  
	
		
	
	
	| 
			
			 
			
				October 29th, 2006, 12:16 AM
			
			
			
		 |  
	| 
		
			
			| 
 Brigadier General |  | 
					Join Date: Oct 2006 Location: Northern Ireland 
						Posts: 1,923
					 Thanks: 2 
		
			
				Thanked 5 Times in 5 Posts
			
		
	      |  |  
    
	| 
				 Re: Eater of the Dead 
 And less controllable, and easier to magic to death. |  
	
		
	
	
	| 
			
			 
			
				October 29th, 2006, 12:23 AM
			
			
			
		 |  
	| 
		
			|  | 
 Major |  | 
					Join Date: Jan 2006 
						Posts: 1,055
					 Thanks: 4 
		
			
				Thanked 29 Times in 13 Posts
			
		
	      |  |  
    
	| 
				 Re: Eater of the Dead 
 heh magic resistance 18 if I recall so not that easy anymore. |  
	
		
	
	
	
	
	
	
	| 
	|  Posting Rules |  
	| 
		
		You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts 
 HTML code is On 
 |  |  |  |  |