|  | 
| 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
    
    
 |  | 
 
 
	
		|  |  |  
	
	
		
	
	
	| 
			
			 
			
				March 14th, 2003, 04:34 PM
			
			
			
		 |  
	| 
		
			|  | 
 Major |  | 
					Join Date: Oct 2002 Location: Irving, TX 
						Posts: 1,237
					 Thanks: 0 
		
			
				Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
			
		
	      |  |  
    
	| 
				 Re: The neo-standard thread- Standardising additional hull sizes. 
 dogscoff,  
	I guess what I said was confussing, SORRY! I am not going to arbitrarly add images. I mean to add images the Neo-Standard ++ until there are a total of 20. Modders would decide what those images would be. After those 20 slots are full just add another '+' to the Neo-Standard ++. Does that make more sense?Quote: 
	
		| Originally posted by dogscoff: mlmbd: Go for it. I'm not sure that simply adding hulls to reach an arbitrary limit is necessarily a good idea, but if you can find them, use them.
 |  
 mlmbd
     |  
	
		
	
	
	| 
			
			 
			
				March 16th, 2003, 09:04 AM
			
			
			
		 |  
	| 
		
			|  | 
 Shrapnel Fanatic |  | 
					Join Date: Jul 2001 Location: Southern CA, USA 
						Posts: 18,394
					 Thanks: 0 
		
			
				Thanked 12 Times in 10 Posts
			
		
	      |  |  
    
	| 
				 Re: The neo-standard thread- Standardising additional hull sizes. 
 Dogscoff, why does the Neo-Standard page still not mention anything about Adamant Mod?    |  
	
		
	
	
	| 
			
			 
			
				June 4th, 2003, 01:50 AM
			
			
			
		 |  
	| 
		
			
			| 
 National Security Advisor |  | 
					Join Date: Nov 2000 
						Posts: 5,085
					 Thanks: 0 
		
			
				Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
			
		
	      |  |  
    
	| 
				 Re: The neo-standard thread- Standardising additional hull sizes. 
 Dogscoff, when you asked about updating the Cluk-Ruk you mentioned the Sat pictures were wrong. 
On the neo standard page there ARE no sat pictures.        Can you update it, or at least post the standard names here?
 
EDIT: or are they on the ++ list?
 
 [ June 04, 2003, 00:51: Message edited by: Phoenix-D ]
				__________________ 
				Phoenix-D
 
I am not senile. I just talk to myself because the rest of you don't provide adequate conversation. 
-Digger |  
	
		
	
	
	| 
			
			 
			
				June 4th, 2003, 07:58 AM
			
			
			
		 |  
	| 
		
			|  | 
 First Lieutenant |  | 
					Join Date: Apr 2001 Location: NY 
						Posts: 794
					 Thanks: 0 
		
			
				Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
			
		
	      |  |  
    
	| 
				 Re: The neo-standard thread- Standardising additional hull sizes. 
 Dogscoff:Legacy of the Ra'shrakil uses quite a few Neostandard Images and then some! Please update accordingly. Oh and Hughs beutifull rendition of my Azlokian also uses Neo-Standard images.
 PS:Make a Generic Neostandard ++ Shipset! ^__^
 |  
	
		
	
	
	| 
			
			 
			
				June 4th, 2003, 09:34 AM
			
			
			
		 |  
	| 
		
			|  | 
 General |  | 
					Join Date: Mar 2001 Location: UK 
						Posts: 4,245
					 Thanks: 0 
		
			
				Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
			
		
	      |  |  
    
	| 
				 Re: The neo-standard thread- Standardising additional hull sizes. 
 
	OK, will do. Not sure when, but hopefully in the next few days.Quote: 
	
		| Dogscoff:Legacy of the Ra'shrakil uses quite a few Neostandard Images and then some! Please update accordingly. |  
 
 
	Yup. got that one- been up there for a week or two now=-)Quote: 
	
		| Oh and Hughs beutifull rendition of my Azlokian also uses Neo-Standard images. |  
 
 
	Uhhh... maybe. I did post a few generic starliners and an elite infantry a while back for proportions players, but I have no idea where to find it now. I think you'll find it in forthcoming Versions of proportions if nowhere else.Quote: 
	
		| PS:Make a Generic Neostandard ++ Shipset! ^__^ |  
 I might have a few other generic ++ images scuffing around here somewhere as well, but apart from that I'm afraid you'll have to find someone else or wait a looong time. I have a bit too much on my plate already- sorry.
 
 
 
	Yes, they are, but even then I think there might be some confusion. However a quick look at existing sets with extra sat images (ie the Puntherraian, the Moonbeams, my KanesS and your ClukRuk) showed the most popular naming convention to be satellitesize rather than sizesatellite, so this is the one I imagine any mods which use the images would adopt. It also Groups the images together alphabeticallly in the folder=-)Quote: 
	
		| Dogscoff, when you asked about updating the Cluk-Ruk you mentioned the Sat pictures were wrong. 
 On the neo standard page there ARE no sat pictures.
 
 EDIT: or are they on the ++ list?
 |  
 Also, remember that there's no need to allocate a size to all three images: You can name any one of the three just "satellite" and let it fill the gap by default, ie satellitesmall, satellite, satellitelarge or satellite, satellitemedium, satellitelarge. These will display correctly if the mod has just "satellite" as the default for all three sizes.
 
 
 
	Yeah, sorry about the delay. Fixed now.Quote: 
	
		| Dogscoff, why does the Neo-Standard page still not mention anything about Adamant Mod? |  |  
	
		
	
	
	| 
			
			 
			
				June 4th, 2003, 09:46 AM
			
			
			
		 |  
	| 
		
			|  | 
 Shrapnel Fanatic |  | 
					Join Date: Jul 2001 Location: Southern CA, USA 
						Posts: 18,394
					 Thanks: 0 
		
			
				Thanked 12 Times in 10 Posts
			
		
	      |  |  
    
	| 
				 Re: The neo-standard thread- Standardising additional hull sizes. 
 
	It has been on the site for a while now, you just never posted in this particular thread about it.Quote: 
	
		| Yeah, sorry about the delay. Fixed now. |   And come into #se4.  |  
	
		
	
	
	| 
			
			 
			
				February 16th, 2004, 05:37 PM
			
			
			
		 |  
	| 
		
			|  | 
 General |  | 
					Join Date: Mar 2001 Location: UK 
						Posts: 4,245
					 Thanks: 0 
		
			
				Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
			
		
	      |  |  
    
	| 
				 Re: The neo-standard thread- Standardising additional hull sizes. 
 *dogscoff drags this dusty old thread out of the archives and mumbles an ancient curse. The thread stirs. It draws breath! It has been resurrected!
OK, anyone who actually gives a toss may have noticed that my lengthy hibernation is now over (for a while at least) and I have started updating my website again and trying to tie up some old projects that have been dragging on for waaaay too long.
 
Anyway, I'd like to bring the neostandard pages up to date. Once again could I please ask all modders and shipset creators to go to  http://www.dogscoff.co.uk/neostand.htm   and  http://www.dogscoff.co.uk/neostandlist.htm   to check that their beloved creations are not only listed but correctly  listed, then post here with the information and/ or corrections I need to bring those pages up to date.
 
Please also feel free to use this thread to vent new and entertaining ways of expressing the fact that I'm a lazy, unproductive bastard who ought to be doing all this research himself rather than bothering all you nice people to do it for me. Your comments are unlikely to change the way I do things, but periodic bouts of verbal abuse do at least help to keep my outrageously inflated ego in check. 
 
Thanks everyone.
 
 [ April 04, 2004, 12:42: Message edited by: dogscoff ] |  
	
		
	
	
	| 
			
			 
			
				April 4th, 2004, 09:29 AM
			
			
			
		 |  
	| 
		
			|  | 
 Shrapnel Fanatic |  | 
					Join Date: Dec 2000 Location: USA 
						Posts: 15,630
					 Thanks: 0 
		
			
				Thanked 31 Times in 19 Posts
			
		
	      |  |  
    
	| 
				 Re: The neo-standard thread- Standardising additional hull sizes. 
 Just moving it to the top for a day or so for the new members to read up on. 
				__________________Creator of the Star Trek Mod - AST Mod - 78 Ship Sets - Conquest Mod - Atrocities Star Wars Mod - Galaxy Reborn Mod - and Subterfuge Mod.
 |  
	
		
	
	
	
	
	
	
	| 
	|  Posting Rules |  
	| 
		
		You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts 
 HTML code is On 
 |  |  |  |  |