|
|
|
Notices |
Do you own this game? Write a review and let others know how you like it.
|
|
|
February 2nd, 2008, 08:12 PM
|
Private
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 18
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
BoB Campaign Question
Hi guys,
I've been watching Band of Brothers over the last couple days (for like the 10th time) and was thinking of firing up the Band of Brothers campaign. I read the opening notes for Scenario 1, which recommend you buy 10 C-47s and one Airborne Recon formation with the 702 points you are given.
I'm assuming this is because of some point tweaks that have been made, but 702 points is not enough to buy the recommended units.
Has anyone else played through this campaign? Does it still play well with this version of the game? Have any updates been released for it?
Thanks in advance for any info!
|
February 2nd, 2008, 09:47 PM
|
|
First Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Ottawa, Canada
Posts: 733
Thanks: 74
Thanked 16 Times in 15 Posts
|
|
Re: BoB Campaign Question
Never played it played but went to have a look, and you're right it doesn't make sense. Also I believe all the other scenarios don't require airborne insertions so why would you want to waste points on Daks, ammo drops I suppose??
Maybe I'm missing a grander scheme here!!??
You can edit the campaign, but I know not everybody’s comfortable with that.
***BTW This should be in Campaigns, Scenarios & Maps Forum, the Mods will likely move it shortly.
|
February 2nd, 2008, 10:24 PM
|
|
Shrapnel Fanatic
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: GWN
Posts: 12,488
Thanks: 3,957
Thanked 5,691 Times in 2,811 Posts
|
|
Re: BoB Campaign Question
Any time the OOB points calculator is adjusted in any way and the OOB's updated it can screw up some of these campaigns that require you to buy specific formations instead of providing them to you. I try to make adjustments to the points allotted based on a rough formula of the changes but it may not have been enough.
I will investigate this
Don
|
February 2nd, 2008, 10:28 PM
|
|
Shrapnel Fanatic
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: GWN
Posts: 12,488
Thanks: 3,957
Thanked 5,691 Times in 2,811 Posts
|
|
Re: BoB Campaign Question
Quote:
PanzerBob said:
Never played it played but went to have a look, and you're right it doesn't make sense. Also I believe all the other scenarios don't require airborne insertions so why would you want to waste points on Daks, ammo drops I suppose??
Maybe I'm missing a grander scheme here!!??
|
Ahhh yep....... the 702 points are SUPPORT POINTS not core points and support points only stay with you for that ONE scenario.
Don
|
February 2nd, 2008, 10:39 PM
|
|
Shrapnel Fanatic
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: GWN
Posts: 12,488
Thanks: 3,957
Thanked 5,691 Times in 2,811 Posts
|
|
Re: BoB Campaign Question
Ok here's the good news. Yes, you are 33 points short but IF you buy the Para Recon [A] formation then all the C-47's you can afford everyone, core and support force will be able to load and drop on the map
I will make a note to adjust this for the next patch but the campaign as it sit's is fully playable
Don
|
February 3rd, 2008, 01:07 AM
|
Private
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 18
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: BoB Campaign Question
Thanks for the quick responses! I am going to dive into the campaign tonight but I just wanted to make sure I wasn't missing something first.
|
February 3rd, 2008, 01:10 AM
|
Private
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 18
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: BoB Campaign Question
Also sorry for posting in the wrong forum...
|
February 3rd, 2008, 11:56 AM
|
Private
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 18
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: BoB Campaign Question
OK one more question....
Does anyone have any tips on the most historically accurate way to load the C-47s in this scenario? I basically just put a squad in each transport, then divvy up the scouts, snipers, and bazooka teams among the planes as best I can. Historically, was there any particular way this would be done? Like would a bazooka team be more likely to be on an HQ plane, etc...?
|
February 3rd, 2008, 12:11 PM
|
|
Sergeant
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Arizona West Coast
Posts: 260
Thanks: 1
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
|
Re: BoB Campaign Question
What is more historical is how they were after the jump. All over the place. Loading as you have by what fits is probably going to give you a better challenge after they hit the ground.
|
February 3rd, 2008, 06:57 PM
|
|
First Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Ottawa, Canada
Posts: 733
Thanks: 74
Thanked 16 Times in 15 Posts
|
|
Re: BoB Campaign Question
Guess I should have flashed it up and I would have saw that thanks Don, Now It makes sense,
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|