|  | 
| 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
    
    
 |  | 
 
 
	
		|  |  |  
	
	
		
	
	
	| 
			
			 
			
				April 1st, 2008, 11:55 AM
			
			
			
		 |  
	| 
		
			
			| 
 Captain |  | 
					Join Date: May 2004 
						Posts: 947
					 Thanks: 1 
		
			
				Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
			
		
	      |  |  
    
	| 
				 Re: Single Age Mod? 
 I noticed that myself, Folket.  When I log on to the server as a player, I only see MA factions.  When I check the server window itself, I see all the correct factions I am supposed to see.  I don't get it. |  
	
		
	
	
	| 
			
			 
			
				April 1st, 2008, 12:19 PM
			
			
			
		 |  
	| 
		
			
			| 
 Sergeant |  | 
					Join Date: Dec 2006 Location: Japan 
						Posts: 351
					 Thanks: 3 
		
			
				Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
			
		
	      |  |  
    
	| 
				 Re: Single Age Mod? 
 When I was creating and adding my god I scrolled down and saw the other nations for the people who choose them. And If you use the mod for other games you will find that foodstamp moved them from the other ages into MA. 
				__________________"Talk is cheap, but if it keeps your belly full and your grave empty it is worth more than gold." - Lords of Magic Manual.
 
 "Luck is what others call skill when they have none." - Phelean Wolf
 |  
	
		
	
	
	| 
			
			 
			
				April 1st, 2008, 01:20 PM
			
			
			
		 |  
	| 
		
			|  | Major General |  | 
					Join Date: Oct 2006 Location: Tennessee USA 
						Posts: 2,059
					 Thanks: 229 
		
			
				Thanked 106 Times in 71 Posts
			
		
	      |  |  
    
	| 
				 Re: Single Age Mod? 
 So people from the other ages are still not able to upload their pretenders? Someone playing an LA or EA nation give us some feedback please  
				__________________BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH NEXT TURN.
 |  
	
		
	
	
	| 
			
			 
			
				April 1st, 2008, 02:37 PM
			
			
			
		 |  
	| 
		
			
			| 
 BANNED USER |  | 
					Join Date: Jan 2008 
						Posts: 23
					 Thanks: 0 
		
			
				Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
			
		
	      |  |  
    
	| 
				 Re: Global War (full, server up) 
 Things seem to be advancing.... I agree that 5 good vs. 8 evil is maybe to equal. Maybe adding another evil nation is better than removing a good nation.
 Tuijdy's point that the evil nations would ignore each other, even with the secret enemies, till the end is a good point. A mechanism to force the game to a quick conclusion if good is defeated decisively is needed. One poster said that the top evil nation should win if good/neutral is defeated. I think this, with very little tweaking, pushes things forward.
 Modified Evil Victory Conditions would be:
 1.Good/Neutral is defeated.
 2.And then either:
 A.The evil nation is the first or second strongest evil nation by province count.
 B.The evil nation has defeated it's secret enemy.
 
 This will make evil nations compete for province count to, and also mean that once good/neutral is rendered very weak, the top two evil nations will have every incentive to finish things quickly. This makes 'patient waiting' by 4th highest province count evil nation a very... risky... proposition.
 
 Finally, I offer to hold the secret enemy list seperate from Foodstamps administrative actions. I am a new player, and have very little 'relationships' with existing players. Also, I will have no involvement in the game besides holding the master list. I want this game to work, and will keep the list secret.
 
 Also, if you want to add a neutral nation, maybe one of the weaker water nations would make diplomacy interesting. No LA Ryleh, of course. Not so sure.
 
			
			
			
			
				  |  
	
		
	
	
	| 
			
			 
			
				April 1st, 2008, 02:44 PM
			
			
			
		 |  
	| 
		
			|  | Major General |  | 
					Join Date: Oct 2006 Location: Tennessee USA 
						Posts: 2,059
					 Thanks: 229 
		
			
				Thanked 106 Times in 71 Posts
			
		
	      |  |  
    
	| 
				 Re: Global War (full, server up) 
 
	Quote: 
	
		| Finally, I offer to hold the secret enemy list seperate from Foodstamps administrative actions. I am a new player, and have very little 'relationships' with existing players. Also, I will have no involvement in the game besides holding the master list. I want this game to work, and will keep the list secret. 
 |  I don't understand. Are you saying you should have a second copy of the list, or that you don't trust me with the list?
				__________________BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH NEXT TURN.
 |  
	
		
	
	
	| 
			
			 
			
				April 1st, 2008, 02:49 PM
			
			
			
		 |  
	| 
		
			
			| 
 General |  | 
					Join Date: Oct 2007 Location: Poland 
						Posts: 3,414
					 Thanks: 26 
		
			
				Thanked 73 Times in 49 Posts
			
		
	      |  |  
    
	| 
				 Re: Global War (full, server up) 
 Drake49:
 Ekhem, you are brave to come here, with just few posts, and tell that you are more trustworthy than one of the senior community members. Also your words about victory conditions suggest that you completely do not understand the idea of that game nor have you really read that thread.
 |  
	
		
	
	
	| 
			
			 
			
				April 1st, 2008, 02:54 PM
			
			
			
		 |  
	| 
		
			
			| 
 Captain |  | 
					Join Date: May 2004 
						Posts: 947
					 Thanks: 1 
		
			
				Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
			
		
	      |  |  
    
	| 
				 Re: Global War (full, server up) 
 Drake, Foodstamp agreed to be the moderator primarily so he could make the secret enemy list and keep it secret.  (Also so he could spotcheck turns to make sure no Good nations are bloodhunting, for example). 
There is no reason for a second person to hold the list, in fact that would be a security breach!     
As far as other factors involving Evil's victory conditions, I would rather not complicate things any further.  Let's keep them as they are for now.  Maybe next game we will make more additions.
 
Edit:  Peace, Zeldor.      I think his suggestions are potentially good ones..  but only if Evil needs more restrictions.  My thinking right now is that the Secret Enemy thing will be fun and restricting enough.
 
Also, I don't think he was being bold or arrogant, but that he didn't realize that Foodstamp's primary role as moderator was to hold the secret list. |  
	
		
	
	
	| 
			
			 
			
				April 1st, 2008, 04:34 PM
			
			
			
		 |  
	| 
		
			
			| 
 Sergeant |  | 
					Join Date: Oct 2006 
						Posts: 243
					 Thanks: 0 
		
			
				Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
			
		
	      |  |  
    
	| 
				 Re: Global War (full, server up) 
 
	Quote: 
	
		| Zeldor said: Drake49:
 
 Ekhem, you are brave to come here, with just few posts, and tell that you are more trustworthy than one of the senior community members. Also your words about victory conditions suggest that you completely do not understand the idea of that game nor have you really read that thread.
 
 |  
Fewer posts means absolutely nothing, perhaps he just spent less time insulting other community members and posting pointless stuff...His suggestions made sense, but hey drake dominions has a mature community, unlike many other games, trust foodstamp, he will be fair    
P.S I have problem connecting, is the sever down? 
				__________________If you gotta shoot, shoot, don't talk.
 |  
	
		
	
	
	| 
			
			 
			
				April 1st, 2008, 05:08 PM
			
			
			
		 |  
	| 
		
			
			| 
 Second Lieutenant |  | 
					Join Date: Oct 2004 Location: Tucson Az 
						Posts: 463
					 Thanks: 11 
		
			
				Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
			
		
	      |  |  
    
	| 
				 Re: Global War (full, server up) 
 Server down?  I cannot seem to connect. |  
	
		
	
	
	| 
			
			 
			
				April 1st, 2008, 05:10 PM
			
			
			
		 |  
	| 
		
			
			| 
 Captain |  | 
					Join Date: May 2004 
						Posts: 947
					 Thanks: 1 
		
			
				Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
			
		
	      |  |  
    
	| 
				 Re: Global War (full, server up) 
 It might very well be down.  I will have to check it when I get home.  If you don't hear from me in a few hours, then yes, the server was down because I lost internet connection.    |  
	
		
	
	
	
	
	
	
	| 
	|  Posting Rules |  
	| 
		
		You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts 
 HTML code is On 
 |  |  |  |  |