|  | 
| 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
    
    
 |  | 
 
 
	
		|  |  |  
	
	
		
	
	
	| 
			
			 
			
				October 11th, 2008, 05:47 PM
			
			
			
		 |  
	| 
		
			
			| 
 BANNED USER |  | 
					Join Date: Dec 2007 Location: Illinois 
						Posts: 1,133
					 Thanks: 25 
		
			
				Thanked 59 Times in 36 Posts
			
		
	      |  |  
    
	| 
				 Re: Preponderance - Big Team Game! [join now!] 
 
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by DrPraetorious  Sounds like fun.  I'm not sure why we need CBM if we're also assigning points values to nations - but I'll give it a shot.  Am I correct in understanding - the only team-mate allowed for Niefelheim is Jomon?    
 I'll team with anyone and I'll take the weaker nation in the pair |  actually, jomon is the only possible teamate for at least one other nation too, which is why i am advocating strongly for the disallowing of that one other nation  *cough* Hinnom *cough* *cough*
 
Zeldor, we can already see how at least half the current people/teams claiming nations are going for the very powerful teamed with a very underpowerd.  It is like I said, due to the plasticity of gold/gems and power, there isn't a whole lot of disadvantage to forcing very powerful nations to team with underpowered ones.  Unless we disallow inter-team trading, there is simply no way to find a bright line where a 'tactic' becomes an 'abuse'.  Starting nations at opposite sides helps alleviate the problem, but there is no possible way to police the abuse of the team system where one nation is just the ***** of the other; we simply can't define where the inter-team cooperation and trading becomes one just being the other's *****.
			
			
			
			
				  |  
	
		
	
	
	| 
			
			 
			
				October 11th, 2008, 05:57 PM
			
			
			
		 |  
	| 
		
			
			| 
 General |  | 
					Join Date: Oct 2007 Location: Poland 
						Posts: 3,414
					 Thanks: 26 
		
			
				Thanked 73 Times in 49 Posts
			
		
	      |  |  
    
	| 
				 Re: Preponderance - Big Team Game! [join now!] 
 DrP:
 I am more and more inclined towards banning Niefel as they are really overpowered. Even with Jomon as teammate. And as people here are supporting that opinion I may just oficially do it.
 
 Omnirizon:
 
 Nah, you start next to each other. One near caves, one near plains, so pretty much it is every nation fighting. But one has to expand into caves and fight there and other into plains. Theoretically you can make some other ways, but then other nations gets stuck with just 4-6 provs and won't be able to really help.
 |  
	
		
	
	
	| 
			
			 
			
				October 12th, 2008, 02:54 AM
			
			
			
		 |  
	| 
		
			
			| 
 Captain |  | 
					Join Date: Oct 2003 Location: Finland 
						Posts: 883
					 Thanks: 14 
		
			
				Thanked 11 Times in 9 Posts
			
		
	      |  |  
    
	| 
				 Re: Preponderance - Big Team Game! [join now!] 
 I wanna join too if there's still room.
 No teammate or nation preferences, anyone want to team up with harmless "less-than-10-actual-dom3-games" player? *blinkblink*
 
 Lets dance.
 |  
	
		
	
	
	| 
			
			 
			
				October 12th, 2008, 06:33 AM
			
			
			
		 |  
	| 
		
			|  | 
 First Lieutenant |  | 
					Join Date: Jul 2008 Location: Russia, GMT +3 
						Posts: 623
					 Thanks: 117 
		
			
				Thanked 57 Times in 45 Posts
			
		
	      |  |  
    
	| 
				 Re: Preponderance - Big Team Game! [join now!] 
 May I make the first claim of nations?Team: WingedDog & Pretorian
 Nations: Yomi (3) & LA Caelum (5) with total of 8 points
 
 I'll post the other two picks later.
 |  
	
		
	
	
	| 
			
			 
			
				October 12th, 2008, 07:40 AM
			
			
			
		 |  
	| 
		
			
			| 
 Private |  | 
					Join Date: Aug 2008 
						Posts: 12
					 Thanks: 0 
		
			
				Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
			
		
	      |  |  
    
	| 
				 Re: Preponderance - Big Team Game! [join now!] 
 
	Quote: 
	
		| May I make the first claim of nations? Team: WingedDog & Pretorian
 Nations: Yomi (3) & LA Caelum (5) with total of 8 points
 
 I'll post the other two picks later.
 |  I'll play in one team with this doggy ...sorry, winged doggy   ) |  
	
		
	
	
	| 
			
			 
			
				October 12th, 2008, 08:08 AM
			
			
			
		 |  
	| 
		
			
			| 
 Captain |  | 
					Join Date: Nov 2006 Location: Sweden, Ume� 
						Posts: 991
					 Thanks: 5 
		
			Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
		
	      |  |  
    
	| 
				 Re: Preponderance - Big Team Game! [join now!] 
 You think Niefel is more overpowered than Hinnom ? Both are early game monsters, but Hinnom is just better in the later parts of the game. 
 Anyway it seems that ONLY one of these two nations will be in the game, so its probably oki. As to this "feeding" the stronger nation strategy, it seems really dull and I doubt it will be done.
 |  
	
		
	
	
	| 
			
			 
			
				October 12th, 2008, 08:37 AM
			
			
			
		 |  
	| 
		
			|  | 
 First Lieutenant |  | 
					Join Date: Jul 2008 Location: Russia, GMT +3 
						Posts: 623
					 Thanks: 117 
		
			
				Thanked 57 Times in 45 Posts
			
		
	      |  |  
    
	| 
				 Re: Preponderance - Big Team Game! [join now!] 
 Look at the first page - Hinnom is already banned. |  
	
		
	
	
	| 
			
			 
			
				October 12th, 2008, 12:35 PM
			
			
			
		 |  
	| 
		
			
			| 
 General |  | 
					Join Date: Oct 2007 Location: Poland 
						Posts: 3,414
					 Thanks: 26 
		
			
				Thanked 73 Times in 49 Posts
			
		
	      |  |  
    
	| 
				 Re: Preponderance - Big Team Game! [join now!] 
 Evilhomer: 
Nah, I think Hinnom is stronger than Niefel, but both of them are way overpowered, even when compared to nations like Lanka. And team game makes them even stronger as it is easy to get an ally that will just work for them, not with them.
 
WingedDog:
 
Send nation choices via PM   |  
	
		
	
	
	| 
			
			 
			
				October 12th, 2008, 01:19 PM
			
			
			
		 |  
	| 
		
			
			| 
 Captain |  | 
					Join Date: Nov 2006 Location: Sweden, Ume� 
						Posts: 991
					 Thanks: 5 
		
			Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
		
	      |  |  
    
	| 
				 Re: Preponderance - Big Team Game! [join now!] 
 I am teamed up with atul now zeldor. Will there be any benefits for picking teams with less than 10 p total, if so, what will that be ? |  
	
		
	
	
	| 
			
			 
			
				October 12th, 2008, 01:24 PM
			
			
			
		 |  
	| 
		
			
			| 
 General |  | 
					Join Date: Oct 2007 Location: Poland 
						Posts: 3,414
					 Thanks: 26 
		
			
				Thanked 73 Times in 49 Posts
			
		
	      |  |  
    
	| 
				 Re: Preponderance - Big Team Game! [join now!] 
 Evilhomer: 
There may be some, hard to say what as I'd have to check what is really possible. Probably easiest to add would be some inceased pop or gold making site next to capitol. But it should rather be granted to people that have 2+ free points or are left with some bad nation choices [but that shouldn't happen]. I'd prefer [as I'm lazy   ] that everyone just makes 9-10 point teams and there is no need for any bonuses. Ratings are not 100% accurate anyway, you could easily argue that said nation should be +1 or -1. |  
	
		
	
	
	
	
	
	
	| 
	|  Posting Rules |  
	| 
		
		You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts 
 HTML code is On 
 |  |  |  |  |