|
|
|
 |
|

October 27th, 2008, 02:57 PM
|
General
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,327
Thanks: 4
Thanked 133 Times in 117 Posts
|
|
Re: Flaming Arrows
I think it is, but what you'd really want is Fire Sticks and Stones.
|

October 27th, 2008, 03:50 PM
|
BANNED USER
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Illinois
Posts: 1,133
Thanks: 25
Thanked 59 Times in 36 Posts
|
|
Re: Flaming Arrows
Quote:
Originally Posted by thejeff
I think it is, but what you'd really want is Fire Sticks and Stones.
|
no, markata archers get the small bow... but apparently it isn't a fire weapon, or at least not for them
fire sticks and stones would be interesting now... maybe some flaming fling poo
|

October 27th, 2008, 05:07 PM
|
 |
First Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Reading, PA
Posts: 724
Thanks: 93
Thanked 37 Times in 27 Posts
|
|
Re: Flaming Arrows
I just copied the "Fire" weapons from the data base. I see that I managed to copy "Fire breath". I think that is the upgrade from "twelve pack of Old Milwaukee and 7 shots of tequila" breath. 
__________________
Men do not quit playing because they grow old; they grow old because they quit playing.
Oliver Wendell Holmes
|

October 27th, 2008, 05:50 PM
|
 |
National Security Advisor
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Helsinki, Finland
Posts: 5,425
Thanks: 174
Thanked 695 Times in 267 Posts
|
|
Re: Flaming Arrows
The small bows are supposed to get the flaming version, but apparently there's a bug in the spell so that it's not included.
|

October 27th, 2008, 06:06 PM
|
 |
Lieutenant Colonel
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Florence, Italy
Posts: 1,424
Thanks: 740
Thanked 112 Times in 63 Posts
|
|
Re: Flaming Arrows
I'm against giving the Flaming Arrows option to Androphags, personally. As they have so much a bonus with their poison, at least for they "specialization" they should give up some versatility, so there is a use for the other kind of archers, less powerful but more versatile.
|

October 27th, 2008, 07:05 PM
|
BANNED USER
|
|
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 4,075
Thanks: 203
Thanked 121 Times in 91 Posts
|
|
Re: Flaming Arrows
Flame arrows really wouldn't be (much) of an upgrade if any.
Their poison arrows damage even if they don't 'hit.' making them veeeery effective against heavily armored targets. Flame arrows wouldn't.
|

October 27th, 2008, 07:18 PM
|
 |
Lieutenant Colonel
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Florence, Italy
Posts: 1,424
Thanks: 740
Thanked 112 Times in 63 Posts
|
|
Re: Flaming Arrows
Yep chris, but the thing was about being even able diversify their power to be able to re-use Androphag archers against poison-immunes too.
As they're really good against everything which isn't poison immune (or just regenerates fast as hell), making them potentially worthy even against them seems unbalancing to me.
|

October 27th, 2008, 07:44 PM
|
BANNED USER
|
|
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 4,075
Thanks: 203
Thanked 121 Times in 91 Posts
|
|
Re: Flaming Arrows
Hey Tif, are you getting that flame would replace poison?
I'm not sure I would consider that an upgrade.
|

October 27th, 2008, 08:15 PM
|
 |
Sergeant
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Northern VA, USA
Posts: 321
Thanks: 51
Thanked 28 Times in 20 Posts
|
|
Re: Flaming Arrows
Yeah, the "realistic" option for fiery Androphag arrows would be for the poison to be consumed in the flames. In other words, flaming arrows would replace poison arrows, not add to them.
Then again, it seems a bit silly to mention "realism" when discussing a game that already includes flesh-eating giants, demon monkeys, Squid from Beyond the Stars, and Tartarians.
As it is, I think that the current situation sounds fine to me. It's not like Sauromatia is lacking archers! They can just recruit a bunch of guys with composite bows at the nearest fortress....
|

October 28th, 2008, 04:35 AM
|
 |
Lieutenant Colonel
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Florence, Italy
Posts: 1,424
Thanks: 740
Thanked 112 Times in 63 Posts
|
|
Re: Flaming Arrows
chris,
I am getting this.
You are not getting that versatility is an upgrade. Sauromantia could turn the vast poison archers armies they used for early expansion, into vast FIRE archers armies as soon as the enemies start fielding poison immunes to counter them. Shouldn't they at least need to replace the Androphag archers with the non-poison ones to have this opportunity?
Slippery,
can't agree that we shouldn't discuss realism  The relationship about realism and fantasy in the game was long discussed anyway in the first thread about poison arrows by Sombre IIRC.
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|