|  | 
| 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
    
    
 |  | 
 
 
	
		|  |  |  
	
	
		
	
	
	| 
			
			 
			
				July 1st, 2009, 03:14 PM
			
			
			
		 |  
	| 
		
			|  | 
 Sergeant |  | 
					Join Date: Nov 2007 
						Posts: 397
					 Thanks: 14 
		
			
				Thanked 15 Times in 10 Posts
			
		
	      |  |  
    
	| 
				 Re: YARG - Yet Another RAND Game [open 15/19] 
 oooo rand game count me in please. |  
	
		
	
	
	| 
			
			 
			
				July 1st, 2009, 03:19 PM
			
			
			
		 |  
	| 
		
			|  | 
 First Lieutenant |  | 
					Join Date: Jul 2008 Location: Russia, GMT +3 
						Posts: 623
					 Thanks: 117 
		
			
				Thanked 57 Times in 45 Posts
			
		
	      |  |  
    
	| 
				 Re: YARG - Yet Another RAND Game [open 15/19] 
 What about map? I'd prefer something wraparound, so noone could feel safe.   
 Really, people in the corners have an unfair advantage IMO. |  
	
		
	
	
	| 
			
			 
			
				July 2nd, 2009, 12:59 AM
			
			
			
		 |  
	| 
		
			
			| 
 Sergeant |  | 
					Join Date: Jan 2009 
						Posts: 255
					 Thanks: 15 
		
			
				Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
			
		
	      |  |  
    
	| 
				 Re: YARG - Yet Another RAND Game [open 15/19] 
 I'd love to play in this, if there are any slots open.  Seems like the anonymity makes it somewhat newb friendly, and I'm ready for the step up beyond newb-only games :P |  
	
		
	
	
	| 
			
			 
			
				July 2nd, 2009, 01:14 AM
			
			
			
		 |  
	| 
		
			|  | 
 Lieutenant Colonel |  | 
					Join Date: May 2007 
						Posts: 1,462
					 Thanks: 34 
		
			
				Thanked 59 Times in 37 Posts
			
		
	      |  |  
    
	| 
				 Re: YARG - Yet Another RAND Game [open 15/19] 
 WingedDog
When starting locations are random, a bigger advantage is starting with no close neighbours while others start in overcrowded areas. After qwerty I decided to never play without predefined starting locs but in this game I don't mind it. Though generally I'm agree that wraparound map + some work on it would make the game much more balanced and thus interesting for everybody 
Luck is a too big factor in this game and when it is possible to reduce its influence a bit, this better be done  . |  
	
		
	
	
	| 
			
			 
			
				July 2nd, 2009, 01:25 AM
			
			
			
		 |  
	| 
		
			
			| 
 Private |  | 
					Join Date: Jun 2009 Location: Perth, Western Australia 
						Posts: 44
					 Thanks: 1 
		
			
				Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
			
		
	      |  |  
    
	| 
				 Re: YARG - Yet Another RAND Game [open 15/19] 
 If my copy of the game appears soon, I will gladly play. I will be a complete newbie, so not sure if that is welcome? |  
	
		
	
	
	| 
			
			 
			
				July 2nd, 2009, 01:28 AM
			
			
			
		 |  
	| 
		
			|  | 
 First Lieutenant |  | 
					Join Date: Jul 2008 Location: Russia, GMT +3 
						Posts: 623
					 Thanks: 117 
		
			
				Thanked 57 Times in 45 Posts
			
		
	      |  |  
    
	| 
				 Re: YARG - Yet Another RAND Game [open 15/19] 
 Yet another suggestion.We are playing w\o CBM, difficult research, and LA with default magic sites, which means lots of gem-expensive crap with lack of gems. Maybe we should increase magic sites frequency? Not too much, I think 55-65% should be enough.
 |  
	
		
	
	
	| 
			
			 
			
				July 2nd, 2009, 01:40 AM
			
			
			
		 |  
	| 
		
			|  | 
 Lieutenant Colonel |  | 
					Join Date: May 2007 
						Posts: 1,462
					 Thanks: 34 
		
			
				Thanked 59 Times in 37 Posts
			
		
	      |  |  
    
	| 
				 Re: YARG - Yet Another RAND Game [open 15/19] 
 I think that 50% is fine for any case. 35% is too little, while 65 is too much, IMO.50-55% gives everybody a solid chance of finding good sites including sites with mages which I think is good for such game
 |  
	
		
	
	
	| 
			
			 
			
				July 2nd, 2009, 01:46 AM
			
			
			
		 |  
	| 
		
			|  | 
 First Lieutenant |  | 
					Join Date: Jul 2008 Location: Russia, GMT +3 
						Posts: 623
					 Thanks: 117 
		
			
				Thanked 57 Times in 45 Posts
			
		
	      |  |  
    
	| 
				 Re: YARG - Yet Another RAND Game [open 15/19] 
 Black Sun Empire
Well, the game is rather complicated. First three or four of my games vs AI were a complete failure, I joined my first MP game only after 2 victories on multiple impossible AIs, and still I had a lot to learn. Now I consider myself sort of experienced player, I have 1 MP victory, but half of the players in this game are better then I am.  
 So... see for yourself, but if you're totaly unfamiliar with game playing against people could be a total dissapointment. I recomend playing vs AI first, I can guarantee that would be fun (I just remembered my excientment first time I tried crossbreeding   ). Then, when you are able to defeat AIs blindfolded and hads tied - it is a good time to join MP game. |  
	
		
	
	
	| 
			
			 
			
				July 2nd, 2009, 01:54 AM
			
			
			
		 |  
	| 
		
			
			| 
 Private |  | 
					Join Date: Jun 2009 Location: Perth, Western Australia 
						Posts: 44
					 Thanks: 1 
		
			
				Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
			
		
	      |  |  
    
	| 
				 Re: YARG - Yet Another RAND Game [open 15/19] 
 I just think the difference between playing against an AI and SP is huge.
 Currently playing Nief, it has only taken me around 4 hours of game play to be killing them easily. In saying that, I did read a guide from Baalz (sp?) and that helped me a heap of tactics and predator design.
 Then again, it was a medium sized map with 6 AI set at the default level.
 
 I don't mind losing quickly, I'm just attempting to join as many games as possible early and learn from the best. If someone better comes along, then let them join, I will be fine either way.
 |  
	
		
	
	
	| 
			
			 
			
				July 2nd, 2009, 01:57 AM
			
			
			
		 |  
	| 
		
			|  | 
 First Lieutenant |  | 
					Join Date: Jul 2008 Location: Russia, GMT +3 
						Posts: 623
					 Thanks: 117 
		
			
				Thanked 57 Times in 45 Posts
			
		
	      |  |  
    
	| 
				 Re: YARG - Yet Another RAND Game [open 15/19] 
 
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by ano  I think that 50% is fine for any case. 35% is too little, while 65 is too much, IMO.50-55% gives everybody a solid chance of finding good sites including sites with mages which I think is good for such game
 |  I agree 65, perhabs, is too much. I was thinking about 55, when I was preparing my suggestion. |  
	
		
	
	
	
	
	
	
	| 
	|  Posting Rules |  
	| 
		
		You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts 
 HTML code is On 
 |  |  |  |  |