|
|
|
|
|
April 21st, 2010, 11:51 PM
|
BANNED USER
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Alberta, Canada
Posts: 518
Thanks: 26
Thanked 55 Times in 29 Posts
|
|
Re: Crossbows vs. Longbows
Hmm, decent analysis BigDaddy.
Fatigue comes in to play.
|
April 22nd, 2010, 06:42 PM
|
|
Major
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Moscow, Russia
Posts: 1,045
Thanks: 177
Thanked 23 Times in 21 Posts
|
|
Re: Crossbows vs. Longbows
Quote:
Originally Posted by BigDaddy
Still, I think I'm understanding more of the situation here. The crossbowmen were unskilled. Skilled crossbowmen worked in teams of three with two loaders and a shooter with 3 crossbows and a couple shields that make a wall, but those were mercenaries. Essentially all the longbowmen were a type of mercenary as well. These were all skilled units. The crossbowmen were handed a weapon and sent out.
|
Something like this, yes. You should also note that numbers of such skilled crossbowmen in mercenary units were sometimes less even than numbers of knights - crossbows included some rather intricate details, so were not that common. I've seen a publication of a muster rolls of some mercenary companies - numbers such as 15 knights and 20 crossbowmen seem quite common.
And another thing - crossbow contained an inherent factor of accuracy problem: a joining of bow to stock (forgot a proper name of it). In many museum pieces they are simply lashed together! This was another reason why professionals often preferred a longbow.
|
April 22nd, 2010, 07:26 PM
|
BANNED USER
|
|
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 4,075
Thanks: 203
Thanked 121 Times in 91 Posts
|
|
Re: Crossbows vs. Longbows
usually each knight had an accompaniement of foot soldiers and men at arms he was required to provide.
Typically only nobles were nights with commoners, freemen as longbowmen, men at arms etc.
Medievel lords were required to provide specified numbers of men at arms and there were equivalencies.. so one knight was equal to five men at arms etc.
|
June 15th, 2010, 05:30 PM
|
|
Second Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Central Illinois
Posts: 434
Thanks: 7
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
|
|
Re: Crossbows vs. Longbows
I didn't realize how controversial crossbow vs. longbow was. It seems that this is a controversial topic in modern times as to what to allow people to hunt with. I had thought it was obviously a decent hunting device at least for rifle season. I do think it is much easier to use than a regular or compound bow, and really similar in usage to a gun. Nonetheless, if you see it from the game management side of things, you could just determine crossbow hunting season in a way that help manage deer populations on the margin. Bow hunters see this as horning in on their territory, but if I see it from a conservation aspect, I'm looking to make hunting as open as possible when I need deer harvested safely, and effectively.
|
July 20th, 2010, 11:45 AM
|
BANNED USER
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 130
Thanks: 1
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Crossbows vs. Longbows
Wow. 283 replies. This is an interesting forum. Some of these threads are really huge. Do you folks really have that much to say about this game?
|
July 20th, 2010, 01:46 PM
|
|
Lieutenant Colonel
|
|
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Kansas City, MO
Posts: 1,460
Thanks: 13
Thanked 10 Times in 10 Posts
|
|
Re: Crossbows vs. Longbows
It is a deep game with a lot of different opinions on how things are used (weapons, spells, etc). Remember that different nations have different capabilities and attributes....So what might work for one nation doesn't work for another.
Once you start reading some of the threads you will see that you can glean what you need to know about a certain question and then go back to it for a different question on the same subject.
I have been playing 2 years and some of these guys still amaze me with the amount of knowledge they have. Just read the wiki, the manual and the walk thru that people have written as well as ask questions, and you will start picking it up quickly.
|
July 20th, 2010, 08:33 PM
|
BANNED USER
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 130
Thanks: 1
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Crossbows vs. Longbows
But this thread seems to be about real bows. I read some of it but it's crazy long and bizarre.
|
July 20th, 2010, 09:14 PM
|
General
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,327
Thanks: 4
Thanked 133 Times in 117 Posts
|
|
Re: Crossbows vs. Longbows
There is the occasional temptation to go off on long tangents. Really long tangents.
And then come back a year later and raise the thread from the dead.
It happens.
|
July 20th, 2010, 09:40 PM
|
|
General
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Irving, TX
Posts: 3,207
Thanks: 54
Thanked 60 Times in 35 Posts
|
|
Re: Crossbows vs. Longbows
Ahh! God no! It's been resurrected again!@
__________________
Be forewarned, anything I post is probably either 1) Sophomoric humor, 2) Satire, 3) A gross exaggeration of the power I currently possess, 4) An outright lie, or 5) Drunken ramblings.
I occasionally post something useful.
|
July 21st, 2010, 11:36 AM
|
|
Sergeant
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: The wild barbaric north
Posts: 215
Thanks: 50
Thanked 5 Times in 4 Posts
|
|
Re: Crossbows vs. Longbows
did we ever settle the debate on the value of bagpipes?
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|