Quote:
Originally Posted by CthulhuDreams
This would be game three for me.
Can I join as Ryleh? It's my favorite nation for reasons that should be very obvious.
I would vote to enable score graphs.. it's pretty useful for knowing what the heck is going down, which will be more important in a newbie game.
Edit: I'm not in favour of 'binding' treaties. What does binding even mean? You're going to kick the offender out of the game?
|
You're in as Ryleh!
As far as binding treaties go, I was just thinking of role-playing, where it's a world where a leader's word is considered important, and treaties are only broken after months of convincing the populace your decision is just. I have no problem with "Do what you want" if that's the general consensus, I've just heard that a lot of veterans say it's not a bad idea to have binding treaties (again, you can break them, just not without three turns notice). How does everyone else feel?
I'm pretty set on ditching the graphs, though. I just don't like them.