.com.unity Forums
  The Official e-Store of Shrapnel Games

This Month's Specials

Raging Tiger- Save $9.00
winSPMBT: Main Battle Tank- Save $6.00

   







Go Back   .com.unity Forums > Shrapnel Community > Space Empires: IV & V

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #21  
Old February 4th, 2001, 09:55 AM

Talenn Talenn is offline
Sergeant
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Posts: 273
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Talenn is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Proposed \'Quick Fix\' for some Combat \'Anomalies\'

Lucas:

Yes, some folks have experimented with teaching the AI to 'missile dance'. Unfortunately, it simply makes missiles a 'trump' card and pigeon-holes players (and AIs) into researching them and PD weapons up every game. IMO, it detracts from replay value as you know that EVERY game you have to research this stuff or lose. I much prefer options to requirements.

And yep, my first testing was done with stopping movement after firing a seeking weapon, but direct fire weapons didnt suffer the same penalty. It worked well. But I figured why not make it pertain across the board and remove the 'hit and run' problem as well?

Its really not to difficult for anyone to test what it feels like. Simply use the combat simulator and play both sides. Try it out both ways and see what you think.

The difference in 'penalty' by ship class was simply for flavor. I'd like for small ships to have some sort of 'maneuverability' advantage over the capital ships and this is nice, simple and abstract way to represent it.

Thanx for the input.

Talenn
Reply With Quote
 

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:04 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©1999 - 2024, Shrapnel Games, Inc. - All Rights Reserved.