February 9th, 2004, 08:30 PM
|
|
Shrapnel Fanatic
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Southern CA, USA
Posts: 18,394
Thanks: 0
Thanked 12 Times in 10 Posts
|
|
Re: Unusual New Propulsion Idea
Quote:
Okay, I may be wrong in this. I remembered that MOO1&2 were made by Microprose. Also I know that Quicksilver made MOO3, but Atari bought Quicksilver and cut all support from MOO3. Who knows, perhaps they had some revolutionary idea but it never saw daylight because of this. I assumed that Microprose had become into Quicksilver. Perhaps it just bought rights from Simtex.
|
Microprose was bought out by Hasborg (or Hasbro... ), who did not interfere too much. Civ 2 ToT was released under Hasborg dominion. Then Hasborg was by by Infogrames, who lead to the abomination that is Civ 3. Then Infogrames was bought out by Atari. I am not entirely sure where Quiksilver was from, but I think that Simtex was some sort of subdivision of the overal Microprose company, which had lots of different developers under it. So the rights to MOO were transfered with the ownership of Microprose.
Quote:
I didin't say it wasn't perfect. Only that it is best of current ways to simulate real time combat when you take into account playability in multiplayer. I still stand behind this. Real time is ideal if you just find the way to control it without it getting into clicking feast. Please, tell us if you know one.
|
I did tell you the ideal way.
Multiplayer has combat executed strategically without player intervention (PBEM), so what does it matter how it is executed in multiplayer, as long as it makes sense and it works? For hotseat you can have it forcibly do the auto-pause after X seconds method, and give each player the chance to revise/issue orders, just as if they were doing single player. It would still work great with real time combat. You would have to have the players agree to how long combat is executed before the "pausing phase", either at game setup or for each combat. Having both modes possible when you create a game (pick which one will be in effect the entire game) would be the optimal solution. Now if a proper TCP/IP mode is introduced for SEV, you can use the auto pause after X seconds feature exactly the same way as in hotseat. No clickfesting is involved in any mode, at all, unless all parties involved choose to play without the auto-pause after X seconds feature and introduce clickfesting.
|