So whats the downside to Satellites?

[Talenn]

Hi all,

I've been playing nonstop since I got the game and forming my own data set as I go. I'm a real stickler for play balance however and hate to see 'no brainer' decisions.

So far, we (my local gaming crew) have been unable to really come up with a 'downside' for Satellites for use as defense. They can carry a fair amount of firepower, are reasonably cheap and require no maintenance. I think this is the real killer. They have the same weapons and components of a Ship, but dont require the hideously high upkeep. Why is that?

Obviously they die in droves to a well balanced fleet, but for the cost, you cant beat em. Any planet that isnt busy building something else can be busy building satellites. The most successful we've seen are just missile platforms and they flood the battle with flights of missiles.

Are we missing something or are satellites like they are to convey the 'defenders' advantage. Actually, they kind of make other forms of static defenses almost unnecessary. Weapons Platforms are limited by Cargo Space and Bases require upkeep.

Any thoughts?

Thanx,
Talenn