Quote:
Boron said:
so far only you continue arguing against me though .
2 possible explanations :
-either all others got bored or just think i tell nonsense and gave up because they think it is impossible to convince me .
-or most start to see that my argument about upkeep is good and they see that there are no things that speak against .
probably it is explantion 1 but hope dies always Last
|
I think it was more #1 than #2. From the other threads here I think people are more than willing to post "I agree" Posts.
As far as I can see you base this whole thing on opinions of the game as a head-to-head player competition with strength units. Thats far from my preferred type of playing style. You seem to have sparked the interest of some people who do tend to do well with that style but dont be too surprised if people who play solo, stealth, magically, diplomatically, or swarm (just to name a few) have wandered off to other threads.
You also appear to have a fondness for "balanced units" games (which by the way tend to bore me to death). The rock-paper-scissor balance (nothing is too strong as long as SOMETHING can beat it) which DOm2 does at national level (not that a unit can be beat, but only that a nation can outpower a nation as long as there is another nation which can beat it)
As far as the summons thing, your search for balanced logic is fine. But there isnt alot of agreement that its a problem. And the fix would affect other points of balance.
Re: Poll: morale and routing
Threaded Mode