|
|
|
View Poll Results: Does replacing someones global with your own constitute a violation of a NAP?
|
No
|
  
|
22 |
62.86% |
Yes
|
  
|
13 |
37.14% |

March 29th, 2005, 06:18 PM
|
 |
First Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Albuquerque, NM
Posts: 605
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: NAP
@ big daddy
Perhaps I should have explained more of what was going on beforehand.
The global in question is Well of Misery, and the former owner of it also has Mother Oak. The new owner has no other globals.
I had assumed it would be obvious that I was discussing casting the same spell; why else would there even be a remote reason to call it agression? Oh well.
I was just hoping this thread would dissuade rex_havok from throwing the game away (giving all his VPs to the 3rd player) in a fit of anger.
__________________
Every time you download music, God kills a kitten.
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|