Semi-OT: The Icaran Empire Preview (the book one)

[Hunpecked]

Very interesting discussion between El_Phil and Starhawk. Some more comments:

The "weak" Icaran army: Ah, now I get it. The army was a basically sound institution in temporary decline because of neglect and mismanagement. The resulting opportunity was just too good for the Spartans to pass up.

Firearms: I agree with El_Phil on the difficulty of adopting a new weapons technology. The whole process should go a lot faster, however, if the importer can capture/bribe the needed experts and/or buy sufficient weapons from smugglers or neutral parties while building up its own infrastructure.

Easy conquests: I can think of one way an enemy state could seemingly collapse after a long resistance. Suppose the Icarans developed extensive and sophisticated subversion, propaganda, and "black ops" capabilities. When the effects of propaganda, bribes, blackmail, assassination, sabotage, etc. reach the "tipping point", resistance could collapse in a relatively short time. Of course the Icarans would also have to develop effective assimilation techniques or, as El_Phil points out, their new "assets" would be more like ticking time bombs.

Decline and fall: El_Phil also has a good point about the long span of the Icaran Empire; such an empire is unique in human history. Egypt, Macedon, Rome, Mongolia, Spain, Turkey, and England built great empires, but in the end they were all temporary. Various combinations of internal decay, rebellion, and outside pressure brought them all down eventually. The Icaran empire has to have a character not found in these other states, a character that's flexible enough to adapt to changing circumstances but durable enough to last millenia. As I recall, Starhawk has written about advanced education/indoctrination techniques and the option of "removing" an ineffective Praetor in the "modern" Icaran empire, which is a fair start.

Iron: I browsed around the web a bit, and found sites confirming El_Phil's data on iron's drawbacks compared to bronze. There is speculation that iron finally supplanted bronze in the Med mainly because of some kind of disruption of the tin trade, making bronze almost unobtainable.

The story might make sense if the Icarans had developed steel, but that would require substantial advances in smelting and metalworking. Perhaps the inventive Icarans had been playing with steel for some years as a curiosity (its military potential overlooked by the Triumvirate), and only turned to it in earnest out of desperation.

Alternatively, maybe the Icarans' armor advance was in design rather than material. I know little about armor, but I understand the Romans wore mail instead of the Greek hoplite breastplate. I gather mail is lighter than plate armor, so perhaps that would give the Icaran infantry the edge on their opponents. However, as I recall one disadvantage of mail is the labor required to make it.

Any armor experts on the forum?