AIFV costs, should them be lowered or not?

pdoktar AIFV costs, should them be... March 14th, 2006, 12:58 PM

narwan Re: AIFV costs, should them... March 14th, 2006, 01:23 PM

pdoktar Re: AIFV costs, should them... March 14th, 2006, 02:19 PM

narwan Re: AIFV costs, should them... March 14th, 2006, 05:07 PM

pdoktar Re: AIFV costs, should them... March 14th, 2006, 06:05 PM

pdoktar Re: AIFV costs, should them... March 14th, 2006, 06:17 PM

Listy Re: AIFV costs, should them... March 14th, 2006, 07:12 PM

hoplitis Re: AIFV costs, should them... March 14th, 2006, 09:43 PM

pdoktar Re: AIFV costs, should them... March 15th, 2006, 06:35 AM

hoplitis Re: AIFV costs, should them... March 15th, 2006, 08:12 AM

Mobhack Re: AIFV costs, should them... March 15th, 2006, 08:56 AM

narwan Re: AIFV costs, should them... March 15th, 2006, 02:26 PM

#10

March 15th, 2006, 08:12 AM

hoplitis

Sergeant

Join Date: Dec 2005

Posts: 261

Thanks: 1

Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts

Re: AIFV costs, should them be lowered or not?

I have no problem with cost recalculation of IFV vs MBT But I must not be done on a comparison of IFV vs "lowtech" APC . The low tech APC is a lightly armored + light inf support or light AA MG lorry to move inf around,while the IFV is a "weapons platform" (ATGMs,more/heavier inf support weapons, better optics etc.). So, different missions.

Bookmarks

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts BB code is On Smilies are On [IMG] code is On HTML code is On Forum Rules

Forum Jump