Surface to Air Missile Inconsistencies

PlasmaKrab · #7 October 8th, 2007, 08:17 AM

Suhiir, did you rerun your HE values since last time we went over the MANPADS issue?
Since that point, my Stinger all have 5-2-5 as WHS-HEP-HEK. BTW where did you get that Stinger warhead efficiency should rise over the years?

Regarding the accuracy ratings, I have stuck to the following (The early Stinger being my 100 benchmark model for comparison purposes):
Code:

Model       Name                Acc.  WHS  HEP  HEK  MinRange MaxRange EW

FIM-43      Redeye              60    4    2    3    ???      90       0

FIM-92A     Stinger             100   5    2    5    4        80       2

FIM-92B     Stinger             100   5    2    5    4        96       3

FIM-92C     Stinger-RMP         110   5    2    5    4        96       5

FIM-92E/F/H Stinger-RMP Block1  120   5    2    5    4        120      8

FIM-92J (?) Stinger-RMP Block2  135   5    2    5    4        160      12

Regarding the heavier SAMs, as I said, the warhead scale is fuzzier. For now I have settled for 1kg -> 1HEK and WHS=3.5+M(wh)/3. Gives the following, not tested yet or expanded to other countries:
Code:

Model        Name        Acc.  WHS  HEP  HEK  MinRange MaxRange EW

MIM-23       HAWK        80    22   5    54   40       203      3

MIM-23B      I-HAWK      90    28   5    74   30       207      6

MIM-23C      HAWK-III    105   28   5    74   30       209      10

MIM-104A     Patriot     125   32   5    91   160      214      9

MIM-104C     PAC-2       150   32   10   84   60       234      10

MIM-104D     PAC-2/GEM   150   32   10   84   60       234      15

MIM-104E     PAC-2/GEM+  165   32   10   84   60       234      18

MIM-104M (?) PAC-3       180   32   70   40   60 (?)   202      20

Tell me if you find more workable scales for HE and acc/EW values.