Fallacy - Middle Era (Started!)

[Xox]

I know there are a few proponents of your way of thinking Hadrian, as evidenced in other threads. But I also know that the majority do not agree with that line of reasoning.

It boils down to this:

You agreed to a nonagression treaty with me,

you attacked me without warning,

you broke the treaty.


Your claim that your attacks are not considered "real" attacks is just rules lawyering to gain an advantage.

Actually our particular example of this debate is illuminating because while a few people other than Hadrian may claim anonymous rituals do not break a nap even though most people say they do.... Hadrian has pushed that reasoning to its extreme conclusion.

He reasons anonymous attacks are not really an attack and so does not just one or two or even ten, but about 50 as a precurser to the "offical" attacks. There is no longer even a pretense of who is doing the attacks, yet the claim is that this does not break a nonagression treaty!!?

It shows where that kind of thinking goes.

XOX