Ulm - Ashdod.
It seems that there is some misunderstanding between Ulm and Ashdod. Has been informed that Ashdod is sending away messages accusing Ulm of "violating a NAP, prior to its expiration".
But below is previous message from Asdod to Ulm which states conditions of breaking a NAP:
_______________________________
I regret to inform you ...
From: chrispedersen
That as of this turn(13) my ally requires me to nullify my nap with you.
I personally think it will all be over by the time the nap expires (hostilities could commence on 17), but I am honor bound to say something.
I propose to revisit the matter with you, then.
Best wishes.
____________________
So, on turn 18 Ulm attacked some Ashdod province by a single scout and this is not NAP violation in anyway.
|
Threaded Mode