.com.unity Forums
  The Official e-Store of Shrapnel Games

This Month's Specials

Air Command 3.0- Save $12.00
War Plan Pacific- Save $7.00

   







Go Back   .com.unity Forums > Illwinter Game Design > Dominions 3: The Awakening > Multiplayer and AARs

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #11  
Old July 2nd, 2012, 08:45 AM

Russian_Comrade Russian_Comrade is offline
Corporal
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 87
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Russian_Comrade is on a distinguished road
Default Re: BSoD (Newbie, LA, CBM 1.92) [Started!]

Quote:
Originally Posted by mattyburn7 View Post
I finally have time to chime in a bit. Couple thoughts/points

1) It sounds like everyone is about ready to concede. I know the writing is on the wall, but I'd like a few turns of fighting with Ermor to try to test some things and learn some things. If others want to turn AI that is fine, but I'll stick it out a bit longer.
Same thing. I'll fight until my armies will be destroyed.

Quote:
Originally Posted by mattyburn7 View Post
2) I found it amusing how LL kept insisting I was the main threat based on research and 1 battle while it was painfully obvious that Ermor was conquering the world. Everytime I tried to point out that Ermor was the main threat I'd hear from LL and Shardphoenix about how easy it would be to beat Ermor. Well, we see how that turned ou.t
Actually, the same thing. I had a talk with LL and he managed to make me think the same way. Sorry.

Quote:
Originally Posted by mattyburn7 View Post
3) There was a somewhat long thread on the main forums page about NAPs. The consensus seems to be there is no consensus. Some players think its perfectly acceptable to move 20 stealthy armies into every province during a NAP, cancel, then spring a huge Alpha. Others would be appalled by that. My view tends to be the strictest form. No spies, so stealthy armies (only scouts allowed), no "offensive globals" (like UD) although I think dispels, etc. would be ok. Perhaps in future games, players should be encouraged to define the details of the NAP when they make them. I see lots of areas of potential conflicts.
Again, I agree. Still, it is really difficult to engage in such discussions in fast games when you can't even have any response from some players.

Quote:
Originally Posted by mattyburn7 View Post
4) I have enjoyed the game. Although I am going to hang in a little longer, my congrats to Rev on the win. my thanks to the subs who helped out. Holey, my thanks to you on a smart and beneficial NAP that we created early on. Parone: Thanks for hanging in for so long.
And again, I'm going to repeat those worlds.
Reply With Quote
 

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:57 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©1999 - 2025, Shrapnel Games, Inc. - All Rights Reserved.