Re: CM arty modeling
Well I'm bringing back an "old friend" it's needed again. So the discussion will have to be with the U.S Army, the data is based on extensive testing but also post combat analysis as well. Pages 2 - 5 are the most useful to the discussion on the main forum page. Please read as myself and others have that were involved at the time. The tables in the refs cclearly shows if anything CM and Unitary rounds were generally under strength in the game at that time and now for the sake of discussion. Makes you wonder why the Swedes spent so time and money to ensure that they're Leo MBT's were the best top protected in there class. They saw what top attack weapons can do to tanks after testing they're own 120mm AT mortar round on a bunch of T-72 tanks they had. It's in this thread somewhere started by DRG. This issue keeps popping up every 2 - 4 years it seems and keep doing so I'm sure. There's another thread on this topic that also started in JAN 2010 in here or the main forum. Also note the first couple pages of the thread you're in now. Always nice to get feedback from guys who were there as well.
Regards,
Pat
|
Threaded Mode