|
|
|
 |

May 25th, 2004, 04:08 AM
|
 |
General
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2000
Posts: 3,013
Thanks: 17
Thanked 25 Times in 22 Posts
|
|
Re: Deception
Quote:
Originally posted by Cainehill:
Telling someone via IRC or email that an opponent has leaders in a province that the someone can't see, so that the someone can cast Magic Arrows, strikes me as a cheezy, lice-ridden cheating tactic.
|
That's called standard diplomacy. If you consider that cheating, then I certainly hope you would also consider lying about your identity cheating.
|

May 25th, 2004, 04:11 AM
|
Major General
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 2,425
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Deception
Quote:
Originally posted by Graeme Dice:
That's called standard diplomacy. If you consider that cheating, then I certainly hope you would also consider lying about your identity cheating.
|
I'd have to concur. That does seem to be fairly standard, unless the game has been specifically ruled to be that way, and there wasn't really a rule prohibiting it.
|

May 25th, 2004, 04:23 AM
|
 |
First Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: CA
Posts: 744
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
|
Re: Deception
Quote:
Originally posted by Cainehill:
First, I'm not an apologist for his behavior or his style of gameplay
|
Strange. It seems to me that that's exactly what you have been doing so far in all your Posts on this matter.
Quote:
Originally posted by Cainehill:
If something couldn't be done in game, isn't it darn close to cheating? Messages sent in the game don't get received until the next turn. This is in keeping with the game's background and mechanics. Sending instant updates during a turn isn't.
|
Cainehill, your arguments doesn't make much sense to me. If you thought that using email and isntant Messages on for diplomacy, intelligence sharing between turns, trading, etc. is against the spirit of the game, much less "cheating" as you put it in yor post, why didn't you say so when we begin to play???
For what else do you think we meet on the ICR channle if not to have opprtunity to communcicate between the turns? You did it yourslef many times sending privite Messages to me, in both IRC and email.
As for my part, I've send on turn 1 (!) message to everyone, telling than that to speed up comunication and to conduct dimplomacy efficiently I suggest we use email, like we always do in all Dom2 MP games that I've played. I even went so far as to send everybody my email address. You you had any issue with that you should say so back than. Instead you never said a word about it before, but now you are puting the show of shock and distaste. Sorry, but I can't buy it.
As for alliances - I already expaliend to you. If you think that alliance between weaker nations against opponent who much stronger than each of them separetly and is clearly going to dominate the map very soon (as Caelum did) is dishonorable , you will never going to win any serious MP Dom2 games.
Quote:
In response to those people, I'll quote Stormbinder's eloquence : STFU.
|
Heh, Cain makes me feel like an raw, coarse oldtimer who taught the baby how to swear.
I used "STFU" suggestion only during one final converstaion on IRC the day our Fire and Ice game was amandoned. It was made to Norfleet, when he kept interupting our discussion what to do with our game, that was wreaked because of him/Pakhar. As you can imagine I was really pissed at him by that time because of his actions, so I snaped.
You on the other hand seem to be enjoying using this "STFU" again and again with obvious pleasure, while noting that it was copyrighted by me. You really are almost making me ashamed thinking that perhaps I've tought it to you or something. 
[ May 25, 2004, 03:30: Message edited by: Stormbinder ]
|

May 25th, 2004, 04:26 AM
|
Sergeant
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Michigan
Posts: 309
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Deception
I have to agree with Stormbinder, the answers available in this poll are lame.  I think what Norfleet was doing was wrong. But reprehensible is a strong word. It's not like he's been killing and eating little babies... has he?
The thing about this whole affair that bugs me the most are the folks who try and blame the other players for being stupid enough to talk to Norfleet about their strategies. Maybe it was stupid (me, I'd call it friendly, or trusting). But is deceiving and taking advantage of stupid people somehow OK then? Might as well say that its OK to lie and cheat, except when you get caught.
[ May 25, 2004, 03:31: Message edited by: Vynd ]
|

May 25th, 2004, 08:41 AM
|
Major General
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 2,425
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Deception
Quote:
Originally posted by Vynd:
It's not like he's been killing and eating little babies... has he?
|
Mmmm. Babies. Crunchy. They were already dead when I found them, though! I swear!
[ May 25, 2004, 07:42: Message edited by: Norfleet ]
|

May 25th, 2004, 10:27 AM
|
Sergeant
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 365
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Deception
Maybe I'm naive and maybe I'm the only one, but I actually believe Norfleet that he wasn't trying to get information to give himself some kind of advantage. Just doesn't seem like something he'd do.
|

May 25th, 2004, 02:22 PM
|
 |
Second Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Copenhagen, Denmark
Posts: 410
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Deception
Quote:
Mmmm. Babies. Crunchy. They were already dead when I found them, though! I swear!
|
How do you get the babies crunchy? Do you deep fry them?
__________________
"It makes you wonder if there is anything to astrology after all. "Oh, there is," said Susan, "Delusion, wishful thinking and gullibility." (T. Pratchett)
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Hybrid Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|