|
|
|
View Poll Results: Are smaller Non cap-killer fighters a good idea?
|
Good idea it will make things more interesting
|
  
|
3 |
11.11% |
I like small fighters but keep at least capital ship disabling weapons
|
  
|
3 |
11.11% |
I like 20 gun fighters but no capital ship targeting
|
  
|
0 |
0% |
I want small fighters for fighter killing and big fighters for capital killing
|
  
|
10 |
37.04% |
Fighters should be able to target capital ships but have weak guns
|
  
|
8 |
29.63% |
WHAAAA are you mad keep it the way it is
|
  
|
3 |
11.11% |
 |

October 26th, 2004, 09:24 AM
|
Major
|
|
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Solomon Islands
Posts: 1,180
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: An important question to hardcore SEIV strateg
Quote:
Suicide Junkie said:
Fighters can target other fighters fine.
Bomber designs could carry limited anti-ship missiles at the expense of engines and defenses. Vulnerable to regular fighters.
|
Didn't AIC have this stuff? Dedicated anti-fighter fighters or dedicated anti-ship fighters but no all rounder fighter. Whatever happened to it? It was a Version of Proportions optimized for SP.
|

October 26th, 2004, 01:41 PM
|
 |
General
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
Posts: 4,547
Thanks: 1
Thanked 7 Times in 5 Posts
|
|
Re: An important question to hardcore SEIV strateg
SJ, your quote reminds me of something right out of the MOO2 manual that had me confused for years before I figured it out:
"Ships can bomb planets directly, but other ships only indirectly, via bombers."
OK, I was wondering, what KIND of ships can bomb planets directly, given that some other (unspecified and nonexistent as far as I could tell from playing the game) kind of ships can bomb planets only indirectly via bombers... then after SO long I finally figured out that "other ships" was part of the OBJECT of the sentence, not the SUBJECT... 
__________________
The Ed draws near! What dost thou deaux?
|

October 26th, 2004, 05:58 PM
|
 |
Shrapnel Fanatic
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Waterloo, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 11,451
Thanks: 1
Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
|
|
Re: An important question to hardcore SEIV strateg
Quote:
Ed Kolis said:"Ships can bomb planets directly, but other ships only indirectly, via bombers."
OK, I was wondering, what KIND of ships can bomb planets directly, given that some other (unspecified and nonexistent as far as I could tell from playing the game) kind of ships can bomb planets only indirectly via bombers... then after SO long I finally figured out that "other ships" was part of the OBJECT of the sentence, not the SUBJECT...
|
So; Ships can bomb planets...
Fighters can bomb ships...
But ships can't bomb other ships?
__________________
Things you want:
|

October 26th, 2004, 09:55 PM
|
 |
Shrapnel Fanatic
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Southern CA, USA
Posts: 18,394
Thanks: 0
Thanked 12 Times in 10 Posts
|
|
Re: An important question to hardcore SEIV strateg
Quote:
Suicide Junkie said:
So; Ships can bomb planets...
Fighters can bomb ships...
But ships can't bomb other ships?
|
They can shoot torpedoes, missiles, and beams at them. Bombs would be redundant.
|

October 26th, 2004, 10:34 PM
|
 |
Shrapnel Fanatic
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: CHEESE!
Posts: 10,009
Thanks: 0
Thanked 7 Times in 1 Post
|
|
Re: An important question to hardcore SEIV strateg
Nope. Torpedoes are self-propelled, missiles are self-propelled and self-guided and beams are focused energy. Bombs are in free-fall. Clearly not redundant, they just don't make sense for ships.
__________________
If I only could remember half the things I'd forgot, that would be a lot of stuff, I think - I don't know; I forgot!
A* E* Se! Gd! $-- C-^- Ai** M-- S? Ss---- RA Pw? Fq Bb++@ Tcp? L++++
Some of my webcomics. I've got 400+ webcomics at Last count, some dead.
Sig updated to remove non-working links.
|

October 27th, 2004, 01:31 AM
|
 |
Major
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Taganrog, Russia
Posts: 1,087
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: An important question to hardcore SEIV strateg
Launch bombs using the catapults. They are pretty effective in vacuum thus make sense.
|

October 27th, 2004, 01:46 PM
|
 |
Shrapnel Fanatic
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: CHEESE!
Posts: 10,009
Thanks: 0
Thanked 7 Times in 1 Post
|
|
Re: An important question to hardcore SEIV strateg
Could catapults fire the bomb fast enough?
__________________
If I only could remember half the things I'd forgot, that would be a lot of stuff, I think - I don't know; I forgot!
A* E* Se! Gd! $-- C-^- Ai** M-- S? Ss---- RA Pw? Fq Bb++@ Tcp? L++++
Some of my webcomics. I've got 400+ webcomics at Last count, some dead.
Sig updated to remove non-working links.
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Hybrid Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|