|
|
|
 |

October 5th, 2005, 08:46 PM
|
Captain
|
|
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 860
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
|
Re: Something I noticed:
So, Boron, how you doing? We gots proof now that Soul Gate is the best nation, one-on-one, so you need to be watched extra specially!
And thank to Ed for the game! I never met you, but I still felt the cold grasp of your dominion-strategy... I can't say I lament your passing 
|

October 5th, 2005, 10:05 PM
|
Captain
|
|
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 947
Thanks: 1
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Something I noticed:
Yeah, Jeffr. I wasn't saying you were abusing the serpent kyriss or anything, just that I hadn't realized they were made so powerful! They used to suck, now they're too good. Maybe in the next patch they will be just right.
Uh.. for now keep using them! 
|

October 6th, 2005, 09:17 AM
|
Second Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 483
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Something I noticed:
the serpent krysses are definitely powerful now, but they are 10 gems a pop and axes or swords of sharpness are powerful aromrpiercers too for only 5 gems.
|

October 6th, 2005, 10:00 AM
|
 |
Lieutenant General
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 2,687
Thanks: 20
Thanked 54 Times in 39 Posts
|
|
Re: Something I noticed:
eh, kryss is two attacks, ap, and poison. Its very strong. Even though water gems are much less valuable, I find I'm forging kryss's instead of swords of quickness.
|

October 6th, 2005, 10:29 AM
|
Second Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 483
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Something I noticed:
oh yeah forgot about the second attack. Well that makes it clearly better than the rest. The question is: Should all nonlifedraining items have the power of the kryss, or should the kryss be toned down?
|

October 6th, 2005, 11:20 AM
|
 |
Lieutenant General
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Albuquerque New Mexico
Posts: 2,997
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Something I noticed:
Another turn.
__________________
Wormwood and wine, and the bitter taste of ashes.
|

October 6th, 2005, 02:45 PM
|
Captain
|
|
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 947
Thanks: 1
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Something I noticed:
The Kyrss should obviously be either toned down and/or moved to a higher research level. They are far more powerful now than any other lesser magic weapon, so much so that it's rediculous. They need to be moved to research level-4 or -6, and toned down slightly, or kept at research lvl-2 and toned down -a lot-.
|

October 6th, 2005, 02:59 PM
|
Lieutenant General
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Alaska
Posts: 2,968
Thanks: 24
Thanked 221 Times in 46 Posts
|
|
Re: Something I noticed:
Quote:
Turin said:
oh yeah forgot about the second attack. Well that makes it clearly better than the rest. The question is: Should all nonlifedraining items have the power of the kryss, or should the kryss be toned down?
|
Kryss will be going down.
|

October 6th, 2005, 09:41 PM
|
Sergeant
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 356
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
a new turn is up
New turn.
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Hybrid Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|