|  | 
| 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
    
    
 |  | 
 
 
	
		|  |  |  
	
	
		
	
	
	| 
			
			 
			
				August 25th, 2006, 11:31 AM
			
			
			
		 |  
	| 
		
			|  | 
 General |  | 
					Join Date: Jul 2004 Location: Portland, ME (USA) 
						Posts: 3,241
					 Thanks: 31 
		
			
				Thanked 65 Times in 18 Posts
			
		
	      |  |  
    
	| 
				 Re: 3.0 Gold Waiting Game - Short PBEM (Open) 
 So, should we try starting the game this weekend, or should we wait until Monday or Tuesday?
 Folks should send me their email addresses via private messages.  (I have djo's email already.)  I will then respond with an email.
 
 Any map preferences?
 
 Pasha
 |  
	
		
	
	
	| 
			
			 
			
				August 25th, 2006, 11:45 AM
			
			
			
		 |  
	| 
		
			|  | 
 Second Lieutenant |  | 
					Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: North Carolina, USA 
						Posts: 403
					 Thanks: 0 
		
			
				Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
			
		
	      |  |  
    
	| 
				 Re: 3.0 Gold Waiting Game - Short PBEM (Open) 
 I'm willing to start now, as long as we have 4.  I think I counted 4.  I'll send you my email, and I'll wait to send my pretender once you request it.  I have some time off later this evening, and that should give me time to adjust my strategy and make my pretender.
 =$=
 
				__________________   |  
	
		
	
	
	| 
			
			 
			
				August 25th, 2006, 06:25 PM
			
			
			
		 |  
	| 
		
			|  | 
 General |  | 
					Join Date: Jul 2004 Location: Portland, ME (USA) 
						Posts: 3,241
					 Thanks: 31 
		
			
				Thanked 65 Times in 18 Posts
			
		
	      |  |  
    
	| 
				 Re: 3.0 Gold Waiting Game - Short PBEM (Open) 
 Ok.  Maybe we can start the game on Saturday.  I will send out an email to all players tonight and then you can send me your pretenders.  
 I assume all players know to send me the .2h file from their "newlords" folder.  The mods should be on when you create your pretender.
 
 We need to pick a map that would be good for 5 players, including 1 water nation.
 |  
	
		
	
	
	| 
			
			 
			
				August 25th, 2006, 07:32 PM
			
			
			
		 |  
	| 
		
			|  | 
 Second Lieutenant |  | 
					Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: west of DC 
						Posts: 587
					 Thanks: 6 
		
			
				Thanked 13 Times in 9 Posts
			
		
	      |  |  
    
	| 
				 Re: 3.0 Gold Waiting Game - Short PBEM (Open) 
 Everyone is agreed on CB5.4, right?
 As for maps...Urgaia would work.  Argaia has some frustrating connections, so I'd avoid it.  Sundering has special sites, so also not so good for MP.  Has anyone tried Albatha?  Or Brittain?
 |  
	
		
	
	
	| 
			
			 
			
				August 25th, 2006, 08:19 PM
			
			
			
		 |  
	| 
		
			
			| 
 Lieutenant General |  | 
					Join Date: Dec 2003 Location: Alaska 
						Posts: 2,968
					 Thanks: 24 
		
			
				Thanked 221 Times in 46 Posts
			
		
	      |  |  
    
	| 
				 Re: 3.0 Gold Waiting Game - Short PBEM (Open) 
 
	Quote: 
	
		| BigJMoney said: Productivity halved?
 
 |  Gold income from productivity was doubled, recources from productivity increased by 50%. |  
	
		
	
	
	| 
			
			 
			
				August 25th, 2006, 09:26 PM
			
			
			
		 |  
	| 
		
			|  | 
 Second Lieutenant |  | 
					Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: North Carolina, USA 
						Posts: 403
					 Thanks: 0 
		
			
				Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
			
		
	      |  |  
    
	| 
				 Re: 3.0 Gold Waiting Game - Short PBEM (Open) 
 
	Quote: 
	
		| quantum_mechani said: 
 
	Gold income from productivity was doubled, recources from productivity increased by 50%.Quote: 
	
		| BigJMoney said: Productivity halved?
 
 |  
 |  Ah man, I hate dyslexia.  I triple checked that to make sure it said what I thought it did.  Thank you for pointing this out to me.  It actually helps Ulm quite a bit :-)  That 6% decrease in gold won't hurt too bad, but a 15% increase in productivity will be graciously accepted.
 
=$=
				__________________   |  
	
		
	
	
	| 
			
			 
			
				August 25th, 2006, 10:15 PM
			
			
			
		 |  
	| 
		
			|  | 
 Major |  | 
					Join Date: Jan 2006 
						Posts: 1,055
					 Thanks: 4 
		
			
				Thanked 29 Times in 13 Posts
			
		
	      |  |  
    
	| 
				 Re: 3.0 Gold Waiting Game - Short PBEM (Open) 
 
	Quote: 
	
		| BigJMoney said: 
 
	Ah man, I hate dyslexia.  I triple checked that to make sure it said what I thought it did.  Thank you for pointing this out to me.  It actually helps Ulm quite a bit :-)  That 6% decrease in gold won't hurt too bad, but a 15% increase in productivity will be graciously accepted.Quote: 
	
		| quantum_mechani said: 
 
	Gold income from productivity was doubled, recources from productivity increased by 50%.Quote: 
	
		| BigJMoney said: Productivity halved?
 
 |  
 |  
 =$=
 
 |  Gold is doubled from the mod.  =)  So that'll be a 6% INCREASE. |  
	
		
	
	
	| 
			
			 
			
				August 25th, 2006, 10:47 PM
			
			
			
		 |  
	| 
		
			|  | 
 General |  | 
					Join Date: Jul 2004 Location: Portland, ME (USA) 
						Posts: 3,241
					 Thanks: 31 
		
			
				Thanked 65 Times in 18 Posts
			
		
	      |  |  
    
	| 
				 Re: 3.0 Gold Waiting Game - Short PBEM (Open) 
 
	Quote: 
	
		| djo said: Everyone is agreed on CB5.4, right?
 
 As for maps...Urgaia would work.  Argaia has some frustrating connections, so I'd avoid it.  Sundering has special sites, so also not so good for MP.  Has anyone tried Albatha?  Or Brittain?
 
 |  Yes.  I think we have decided on CB 5.4 (the complete set).
 
I have played on Albatha several times.  (It is available on Illwinter's map page for Dom II)   I like it, and it would give R'lyeh plenty of water to slosh around in.  I'd be up for that.  (I have not found any defects in the map, but I am not particularly observant.)
 
Pasha |  
	
		
	
	
	| 
			
			 
			
				August 25th, 2006, 11:30 PM
			
			
			
		 |  
	| 
		
			|  | 
 Major |  | 
					Join Date: Jan 2006 
						Posts: 1,055
					 Thanks: 4 
		
			
				Thanked 29 Times in 13 Posts
			
		
	      |  |  
    
	| 
				 Re: 3.0 Gold Waiting Game - Short PBEM (Open) 
 I vote 60% magic sites =). |  
	
		
	
	
	| 
			
			 
			
				August 26th, 2006, 12:46 AM
			
			
			
		 |  
	| 
		
			|  | 
 Second Lieutenant |  | 
					Join Date: Sep 2004 Location: Zürich, Switzerland 
						Posts: 418
					 Thanks: 0 
		
			
				Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
			
		
	      |  |  
    
	| 
				 Re: 3.0 Gold Waiting Game - Short PBEM (Open) 
 I support the vote. 
				__________________There are roads which must not be followed, towns which must not be besieged, positions which must not be contested, commands of the sovereign which must not be obeyed. (Sun Tsu "The Art of War", ca. 500 BC)
 |  
	
		
	
	
	
	
	
	
	| Thread Tools |  
	|  |  
	| Display Modes |  
	
	| 
		 Linear Mode |  
	| 
	|  Posting Rules |  
	| 
		
		You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts 
 HTML code is On 
 |  |  |  |  |