|
|
|
Notices |
Do you own this game? Write a review and let others know how you like it.
|
|
September 9th, 2006, 07:03 AM
|
Private
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: USA
Posts: 44
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
\"pounder\" v. millimeter equivalents
What, roughly, do a 2-pounder, six pounder and twenty-five pounder equal in terms of millimeters? Those Brits are so confusing and I presume the "pounder" doesn't refer to the cost of the weapon.
__________________
"The only constant is change. Suck it up and learn to adjust."- Noah Vaile
|
September 9th, 2006, 08:56 AM
|
|
Sergeant
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Ottawa Canada
Posts: 353
Thanks: 11
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
|
|
Re: \"pounder\" v. millimeter equivalents
2 lbr = 40mm
3 lbr = 47mm (Tank gun only)
6 lbr = 57mm
13 lbr = 76mm (pre WWI piece some used as AA early WWII)
17 lbr = 76.2mm
18 lbr = 84mm (Field gun - some converted to 25lbr)
20 lbr = 84 0r 83.4mm (post WWII)
25 lbr = 87.5mm
There were others used in WWI but well out of service by WWII.
Keep in mind that other factors such as barrel length, type of round and charge used need to be considered when assessing the relative power of guns. While of equal calibre, the 25 lbr was much shorter than the German 88 and performance was much less as well. Similarily, the 17 lbr was much longer (and I believe had a heavier charge) than its Russian brothers so had considerably better performance.
Note that while often looked down on, for its time the 2 lbr was a kick *** AT gun.
__________________
"I love the smell of anthracite in the morning...
It smells like - victory"
|
September 11th, 2006, 10:18 AM
|
Private
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 20
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: \"pounder\" v. millimeter equivalents
BTW. There is an official abbreviation of pdr rather than lbr. 6pdr (eg).
I think the 3pdr was much more likely to be found on ships than tanks by ww2.
British ATG used a much hotter load then US and more again than Soviet. Shells could be expected to be of higher quality than soviets, significantly so. Hence solid shells were less likely to shatter on impact and HE shells had more HE content for their calibre and probably more effective content as well. Soviet shells had to have thicker casings than most other countrues like german or US because they couldn't guarantee the tolerances. Iirc 15% less generally.
As if that wasn't enough, the fuses were less reliable.
|
September 11th, 2006, 11:33 AM
|
|
Sergeant
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Ottawa Canada
Posts: 353
Thanks: 11
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
|
|
Re: \"pounder\" v. millimeter equivalents
Quote:
Andy_ONeill said:
BTW. There is an official abbreviation of pdr rather than lbr. 6pdr (eg). ...
|
Sorry - I voluntarily took latin in highschool.
You're right about the 3pdr, I looked at weapons in the general time frame of the game - 30's to late 40's.
__________________
"I love the smell of anthracite in the morning...
It smells like - victory"
|
September 12th, 2006, 11:41 AM
|
Private
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 20
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: \"pounder\" v. millimeter equivalents
It's quite odd really.
Though maybe less interesting to people less ww2 obsessed.
Anyhow and fwiw.
The British used a number of french 25mm ATG in 1940, which weren't too brilliant for that time even. They don't seem to have used any of the french 47mm though. Which they might have called 3pdr.
The French 47mm was a very good gun for that time but presumably the French didn't feel they had a surplus.
The 2pdr was good but the ammo wasn't so brilliant until late 1941 I think. The introduction of face hardening on pz4 particularly highlit the fact that the original design of AP had a tendency to shatter.
|
September 12th, 2006, 02:00 PM
|
Major
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Kladno, Czech Republic
Posts: 1,176
Thanks: 12
Thanked 49 Times in 44 Posts
|
|
Re: \"pounder\" v. millimeter equivalents
How did the British call the 47mm Böhler gun? IIRC some were used with the paras before 6pdr.
__________________
This post, as well as being an ambassador of death for the enemies of humanity, has a main message of peace and friendship.
|
September 12th, 2006, 03:22 PM
|
Private
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 20
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: \"pounder\" v. millimeter equivalents
Are you talking about the use of captured Italian guns in Sicily? Ponte Grande bridge?
Because that's the only time they used them I'm aware of.
|
September 13th, 2006, 03:56 PM
|
Major
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Kladno, Czech Republic
Posts: 1,176
Thanks: 12
Thanked 49 Times in 44 Posts
|
|
Re: \"pounder\" v. millimeter equivalents
IIRC they've used them as a filler between nothing and 6pdr after they were captured so the Sicily might really be the only place they were used.
__________________
This post, as well as being an ambassador of death for the enemies of humanity, has a main message of peace and friendship.
|
September 14th, 2006, 07:54 AM
|
Private
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 20
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: \"pounder\" v. millimeter equivalents
Ah...
I'm 99% certain:
They captured them in sicily.
On dropping by the bridge they found there were italians there and took them on.
Having beat these they found they now had a couple of ATG still intact.
Used them, AFAIK, just at the bridge.
The italian 47mil was fairly handy and had a useful he round. Not so brilliant as an ATG but...
Pretty sure they didn't keep them afterwards.
So never official equipment.
The paras themselves only ever had PIATS in ww2.
It's the air landing had guns like the 6pdr.
They landed in gliders so could have heavy weapons.
Paras at ponte grande, different people.
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|