|  | 
| 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
    
    
 |  | 
 
 
	
		|  |  |  
	
	
		
	
	
	| 
			
			 
			
				January 10th, 2008, 08:39 AM
			
			
			
		 |  
	| 
		
			|  | 
 National Security Advisor |  | 
					Join Date: Sep 2003 Location: Eastern Finland 
						Posts: 7,110
					 Thanks: 145 
		
			
				Thanked 153 Times in 101 Posts
			
		
	      |  |  
    
	| 
				 Re: Supplies - Sending an army that will not starv 
 It would differ from the norm, so unless explained it wouldn't be thematic. If you can give a good reason, it could be. |  
	
		
	
	
	| 
			
			 
			
				January 10th, 2008, 08:53 AM
			
			
			
		 |  
	| 
		
			|  | 
 First Lieutenant |  | 
					Join Date: May 2007 Location: Reading, PA 
						Posts: 724
					 Thanks: 93 
		
			
				Thanked 37 Times in 27 Posts
			
		
	      |  |  
    
	| 
				 Re: Supplies - Sending an army that will not starv 
 I think you can figure out how much supply a given army requires by moving it into a friendly province.  Just note the supplies used in the provinces before and after the move.  Of course, this is very little help, if any at all in determining what the supply situation will be when moving into an unfriendly province.
 As for modding the game to minimize supply issues I think giving an additional supply bonus to commanders would cause the least disruption to the game mechanics that everyone above objects to.  I have never figured out the thematic nature of the commander supply bonus.  A lot of commanders, mainly mage types, have supply bonus, and I have never bothered to figure out why.
 
				__________________Men do not quit playing because they grow old; they grow old because they quit playing.
 Oliver Wendell Holmes
 |  
	
		
	
	
	| 
			
			 
			
				January 10th, 2008, 09:10 AM
			
			
			
		 |  
	| 
		
			|  | 
 General |  | 
					Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: Japan 
						Posts: 3,691
					 Thanks: 269 
		
			
				Thanked 397 Times in 200 Posts
			
		
	      |  |  
    
	| 
				 Re: Supplies - Sending an army that will not starv 
 
	Quote: 
	
		| Endoperez said: It would differ from the norm, so unless explained it wouldn't be thematic. If you can give a good reason, it could be.
 
 |  Eat like a bird?    
	Quote: 
	
		| Edratman said: ... A lot of commanders, mainly mage types, have supply bonus, and I have never bothered to figure out why.
 
 |  Nature magic gives 10 supply per level.
				__________________Whether he submitted the post, or whether he did not, made no difference. The Thought Police would get him just the same. He had committed— would still have committed, even if he had never set pen to paper— the essential crime that contained all others in itself. Thoughtcrime, they called it. Thoughtcrime was not a thing that could be concealed forever.
http://z7.invisionfree.com/Dom3mods/index.php? |  
	
		
	
	
	| 
			
			 
			
				January 10th, 2008, 11:34 AM
			
			
			
		 |  
	| 
		
			
			| 
 BANNED USER |  | 
					Join Date: Feb 2007 
						Posts: 5,463
					 Thanks: 165 
		
			
				Thanked 324 Times in 190 Posts
			
		
	      |  |  
    
	| 
				 Re: Supplies - Sending an army that will not starv 
 I think Caelians taking only 1 supply each is fair enough. I mean everything is arguable thematically, but I think you have justification to change them when cavalry require the same amount of supplies and that's for a horse and a man. |  
	
		
	
	
	| 
			
			 
			
				January 10th, 2008, 01:12 PM
			
			
			
		 |  
	| 
		
			
			| 
 First Lieutenant |  | 
					Join Date: Aug 2007 Location: UK 
						Posts: 792
					 Thanks: 28 
		
			
				Thanked 45 Times in 31 Posts
			
		
	      |  |  
    
	| 
				 Re: Supplies - Sending an army that will not starv 
 We could assume that the effort required to produce enough energy to fly is a lot more than to walk, so they need to eat more. |  
	
		
	
	
	| 
			
			 
			
				January 10th, 2008, 01:39 PM
			
			
			
		 |  
	| 
		
			|  | Second Lieutenant |  | 
					Join Date: Jul 2007 Location: Durham, NC 
						Posts: 509
					 Thanks: 84 
		
			
				Thanked 44 Times in 14 Posts
			
		
	      |  |  
    
	| 
				 Re: Supplies - Sending an army that will not starv 
 Fatties. |  
	
		
	
	
	| 
			
			 
			
				January 10th, 2008, 03:11 PM
			
			
			
		 |  
	| 
		
			
			| 
 Corporal |  | 
					Join Date: Jan 2007 
						Posts: 72
					 Thanks: 0 
		
			
				Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
			
		
	      |  |  
    
	| 
				 Re: Supplies - Sending an army that will not starv 
 How about having the light caelians troops (armor of studded leather or less) use one supply, and having the heavier caelians (cuirass, hauberk... )use the current 2 supplies. All the archers and the light infantry would then use one supply. 
 That would make sense : leather armor is easy to fly with because it has a small weight, flying around with a bulky armor is tough work, so heavy troops need to eat plenty.
 |  
	
		
	
	
	| 
			
			 
			
				January 10th, 2008, 05:10 PM
			
			
			
		 |  
	| 
		
			
			| 
 Major |  | 
					Join Date: Dec 2006 
						Posts: 1,226
					 Thanks: 12 
		
			
				Thanked 86 Times in 48 Posts
			
		
	      |  |  
    
	| 
				 Re: Supplies - Sending an army that will not starv 
 I think just about anything that would encourage the use of actual Caelians as opposed to hordes of mammoths would be a good thing for theme ;-) |  
	
		
	
	
	| 
			
			 
			
				January 10th, 2008, 07:43 PM
			
			
			
		 |  
	| 
		
			|  | 
 Corporal |  | 
					Join Date: Nov 2007 
						Posts: 77
					 Thanks: 0 
		
			
				Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
			
		
	      |  |  
    
	| 
				 Re: Supplies - Sending an army that will not starv 
 
	Quote: 
	
		| Micah said: I think just about anything that would encourage the use of actual Caelians as opposed to hordes of mammoths would be a good thing for theme ;-)
 
 |  like giving the mammoths gluttony?   |  
	
		
	
	
	| 
			
			 
			
				January 10th, 2008, 09:34 PM
			
			
			
		 |  
	| 
		
			
			| 
 BANNED USER |  | 
					Join Date: Feb 2007 
						Posts: 5,463
					 Thanks: 165 
		
			
				Thanked 324 Times in 190 Posts
			
		
	      |  |  
    
	| 
				 Re: Supplies - Sending an army that will not starv 
 The current supply model doesn't really make sense anyway, which is part of the justification for changing things to fit better gameplay.
 Mammoths require 5 supplies, Caelians require 2. So three Caelians need more supplies than a mammoth? Caelins need the supplies of two humans, or a knight? Big eaters those Caelians, considering they're lighter and weaker than humans.
 
 And I know people will say "But supplies don't just mean food, they mean all kinds of logistical requirements!" Ok then, explain why creatures that need not eat don't need any supplies, regardless of size.
 
 It's fun to hear thematic arguments though because it's always possible to argue anything either way.
 |  
	
		
	
	
	
	
	
	
	| Thread Tools |  
	|  |  
	| Display Modes |  
	
	| 
		 Linear Mode |  
	| 
	|  Posting Rules |  
	| 
		
		You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts 
 HTML code is On 
 |  |  |  |  |