.com.unity Forums
  The Official e-Store of Shrapnel Games

This Month's Specials

Air Assault Task Force- Save $8.00
Bronze- Save $10.00

   







Go Back   .com.unity Forums > The Camo Workshop > WinSPMBT
Notices


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old September 28th, 2008, 02:01 PM
redcoat2's Avatar

redcoat2 redcoat2 is offline
Sergeant
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: UK
Posts: 234
Thanks: 36
Thanked 53 Times in 43 Posts
redcoat2 is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Smoke vs buildings

Damn. My cunning plan to smoke out the Chechens has been foiled.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old September 29th, 2008, 06:40 PM
Listy's Avatar

Listy Listy is offline
Sergeant
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 358
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Listy is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Smoke vs buildings

Quote:
Originally Posted by redcoat2 View Post
Damn. My cunning plan to smoke out the Chechens has been foiled.
Why not just smoke the building their in, move up and beat the snot out of them? Ti scouts if you've got it, TI tanks if not.

Or take up positions and wait for your smoke to clear.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old September 29th, 2008, 08:00 PM
redcoat2's Avatar

redcoat2 redcoat2 is offline
Sergeant
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: UK
Posts: 234
Thanks: 36
Thanked 53 Times in 43 Posts
redcoat2 is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Smoke vs buildings

Thanks for your replies.

I asked the question because I vaguely remember reading somewhere that the Russians used smoke shells (which are incendiary by nature) to set fire to buildings during the Chechnya War, especially during the Battle of Groznyy - which I played as a random battle the other day.

As it was, I was able to suppress the Chechens with ‘shmel’/artillery/rocket fire (and tank fire from a safe distance) and then attack their buildings with infantry protected by smoke screens.

P.S. I can’t remember where I read about the smoke shells being used as incendiaries and so I’m not sure whether it was true or not.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old September 29th, 2008, 08:48 PM
iCaMpWiThAWP's Avatar

iCaMpWiThAWP iCaMpWiThAWP is offline
First Lieutenant
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Brazil/France/Somewhere over the Atlantic
Posts: 660
Thanks: 21
Thanked 30 Times in 19 Posts
iCaMpWiThAWP is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Smoke vs buildings

now i see, skirmisher's right, the ten year old code limits what can be done
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old September 30th, 2008, 12:25 AM
Listy's Avatar

Listy Listy is offline
Sergeant
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 358
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Listy is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Smoke vs buildings

Quote:
Originally Posted by redcoat2 View Post
Thanks for your replies.

I asked the question because I vaguely remember reading somewhere that the Russians used smoke shells (which are incendiary by nature) to set fire to buildings during the Chechnya War, especially during the Battle of Groznyy - which I played as a random battle the other day.
Sure they're not talking about WP? Reporters are rather notorious for giving out the wrong details
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old September 30th, 2008, 07:59 AM
redcoat2's Avatar

redcoat2 redcoat2 is offline
Sergeant
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: UK
Posts: 234
Thanks: 36
Thanked 53 Times in 43 Posts
redcoat2 is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Smoke vs buildings

Quote:
Originally Posted by Listy View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by redcoat2 View Post
I asked the question because I vaguely remember reading somewhere that the Russians used smoke shells (which are incendiary by nature) to set fire to buildings during the Chechnya War, especially during the Battle of Groznyy - which I played as a random battle the other day.
Sure they're not talking about WP? Reporters are rather notorious for giving out the wrong details
I can’t remember how reliable my source was - as I said. It could have been a news reporter (i.e. unreliable) or it may have been a defence journal or Russian eyewitness account. The Russians certainly used WP in Groznyy. And, as Marek has pointed out, their smoke shells probably contained white phosphorus as well.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old September 30th, 2008, 09:19 AM
iCaMpWiThAWP's Avatar

iCaMpWiThAWP iCaMpWiThAWP is offline
First Lieutenant
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Brazil/France/Somewhere over the Atlantic
Posts: 660
Thanks: 21
Thanked 30 Times in 19 Posts
iCaMpWiThAWP is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Smoke vs buildings

Quote:
Originally Posted by redcoat2 View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Listy View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by redcoat2 View Post
I asked the question because I vaguely remember reading somewhere that the Russians used smoke shells (which are incendiary by nature) to set fire to buildings during the Chechnya War, especially during the Battle of Groznyy - which I played as a random battle the other day.
Sure they're not talking about WP? Reporters are rather notorious for giving out the wrong details
I can’t remember how reliable my source was - as I said. It could have been a news reporter (i.e. unreliable) or it may have been a defence journal or Russian eyewitness account. The Russians certainly used WP in Groznyy. And, as Marek has pointed out, their smoke shells probably contained white phosphorus as well.
WP nades would be great in game, i'll try to make one, i guess that infantry flame is the class
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old September 30th, 2008, 03:01 PM

thatguy96 thatguy96 is offline
Captain
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 801
Thanks: 3
Thanked 21 Times in 20 Posts
thatguy96 is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Smoke vs buildings

Quote:
Originally Posted by iCaMpWiThAWP View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by redcoat2 View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Listy View Post

Sure they're not talking about WP? Reporters are rather notorious for giving out the wrong details
I can’t remember how reliable my source was - as I said. It could have been a news reporter (i.e. unreliable) or it may have been a defence journal or Russian eyewitness account. The Russians certainly used WP in Groznyy. And, as Marek has pointed out, their smoke shells probably contained white phosphorus as well.
WP nades would be great in game, i'll try to make one, i guess that infantry flame is the class
You could probably achieve the desired effect by just changing the class of the basic grenade to "Infantry Flame."

Also of note, the napalm class for aircraft isn't ruled by the 1 hex to the rear distance restriction that bombs and cluster munitions are (ie, if you make a bomb or cluster bomb using either of the relevant classes it will always drop behind the aircraft). What this means is that you can set napalm weapons to range +1 and actually get incendiary rockets, etc, with the napalm effects.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:36 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©1999 - 2025, Shrapnel Games, Inc. - All Rights Reserved.