.com.unity Forums
  The Official e-Store of Shrapnel Games

This Month's Specials

Raging Tiger- Save $9.00
winSPMBT: Main Battle Tank- Save $5.00

   







Go Back   .com.unity Forums > Shrapnel Community > Space Empires: IV & V

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old June 30th, 2002, 03:04 AM
Seik's Avatar

Seik Seik is offline
Corporal
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Germany
Posts: 84
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Seik is on a distinguished road
Default Re: LRS vs. Planets

It would be nice to see the cargo ...

But if you do not want to loose your entire fleet you can send in a small scout!
The scut will be destroyed in most of the times but you "see" the defense of that planet.

Seik

[ June 30, 2002, 02:05: Message edited by: seik ]
__________________
Greetings
Seik

__________________________________________

Real programers do not comment their code.
It is hard to write and it should be hard to understand!
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old June 30th, 2002, 03:30 AM
dreamplace's Avatar

dreamplace dreamplace is offline
Private
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Hongkong (moved form Toronto, Canada)
Posts: 37
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
dreamplace is on a distinguished road
Default Re: LRS vs. Planets

That's a Intel project called
"Cargo Maintenance Problem"
I'm not sure how did it work, maybe that will help to destory some fighters/WPs store in planet.
__________________
SE4 Code:
L-- $!+ Fr- Sf+ Tcp A- M- RV Pw++ Fq+ Nd++ Rp G Au Mm++
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old June 30th, 2002, 03:58 AM
StarJack's Avatar

StarJack StarJack is offline
Corporal
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Atlanta, Ga.
Posts: 164
Thanks: 4
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
StarJack is on a distinguished road
Default Re: LRS vs. Planets

I have to agree that you should be able to scan the planets, if you can scan scout ships! And of course the Surface Scan Jammer would make sense as a preventitive option.
I'm new here and am wondering if Shrapnel, MM, or whoever would be involved in actually considering these suggestions read the forums on a regular basis? If not, how does one propose such things to the games designer(s)?
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old June 30th, 2002, 05:50 AM

Baron Munchausen Baron Munchausen is offline
General
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Ohio, USA
Posts: 4,323
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Baron Munchausen is on a distinguished road
Default Re: LRS vs. Planets

Quote:
Originally posted by StarJack:
I have to agree that you should be able to scan the planets, if you can scan scout ships! And of course the Surface Scan Jammer would make sense as a preventitive option.
I'm new here and am wondering if Shrapnel, MM, or whoever would be involved in actually considering these suggestions read the forums on a regular basis? If not, how does one propose such things to the games designer(s)?
Send him an email. People use various ones.
Info@malfador.com SE4@malfador.com

It does make a difference when people speak up. He has lots of ideas to work on, and if many people want something in particular it gets bumped up the priority list.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old June 30th, 2002, 08:15 AM
Q's Avatar

Q Q is offline
Colonel
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 1,661
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Q is on a distinguished road
Default Re: LRS vs. Planets

If you attack the planet with one single drone or the smallest group of fighters, you will get all the information you want. IMHO this is easy enough, so I do not want a long range scanner for planets,
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old June 30th, 2002, 09:05 AM

CW CW is offline
Second Lieutenant
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Australia
Posts: 409
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
CW is on a distinguished road
Default Re: LRS vs. Planets

Quote:
Originally posted by TerranC:
How is it too powerful?
Consider the price difference between the ship-mount sensor and a facility, not to mention the production loss the planetary psychic scanner causes by taking up a slot. A 20kT ship-board sensor will give you a range of 5, that's every square except the outer most rows and columns if you put it in the centre on a cheap 2000 minerals satellite! I think the planetary psychic scanner do too little for the cost and never use it!

If you want intel on a planet, just send in a fighter or something equally worthless. Letting you see everything with a simple and cheap sensor makes dull, boring and predictable game play. As I said before, I consider surprises part of the fun.
__________________
A propeller is just a big fan in front of the plane designed to keep the pilot cool. Want prove? Stop the prop and watch the pilot break out in a heavy sweat!
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old July 1st, 2002, 05:11 AM

Askan Nightbringer Askan Nightbringer is offline
Corporal
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Sydney, Australia (the 3rd island!)
Posts: 198
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Askan Nightbringer is on a distinguished road
Default Re: LRS vs. Planets

Of course minefields prevent sending in expendable ships/fighters to see what's at a planet.

I've never used the ship scanners thou. I always attack big fleets with expendable ships to see what's there (only to see the levels of ECM and Sensors)

Scanners for planets seems oddly useful. Might convince players to watch out for their ally's ships as well, and give paranoid border protectionists like me another advantage.

Put it in I say.

Askan

[ July 01, 2002, 04:12: Message edited by: Askan Nightbringer ]
__________________
It should never be forgotten that the people must have priority -- Ho Chi Minh
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:06 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©1999 - 2025, Shrapnel Games, Inc. - All Rights Reserved.