Rock the Cradle--Noob Only! (RUNNING)

CthulhuDreams · #1 November 27th, 2010, 03:06 PM

Quote:

Could we please keep this game friendly?

Sorry, you set being friendly on fire by ramboing into me with no prelude at all. Hint: If you want friendly relations, don't be an ***!

Either you stop attacking me now and tear down that temple, or I'll see you in hell. While that temple is there, it's a standing declaration of war.

earwicker7 · #2 November 27th, 2010, 04:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CthulhuDreams

I'm not in favour of 'binding' treaties. What does binding even mean? You're going to kick the offender out of the game?

Quote:

Originally Posted by CthulhuDreams

So.. what are you going to do if someone breaks it without 3 turns notice? Kick them out of the game?

That would, to be, seem pretty weird.

Anyway, from an RP history has loads of examples where people went in for the sneaky backstab. Heck, WWII has an example where both sides were planning on backstabbing each other despite a NAP.

To me, a monomaniacal dictator RP would be a weird one to exclude.

Quote:

Originally Posted by CthulhuDreams

Quote:

Originally Posted by earwicker7

Had my first battle with a human's army this turn! Someone is more than welcome to offer tribute to Abyssia in order to keep the oceans from turning red with their blood

Or you could just piss off. I'm not even sure why you are trying to rambo me. Because I tried to capture the same neutral provience as you? What the ****?

If you want to start a pointless war we can do that though? I'm happy to abandon playing for the win this game and just make it '**** abysia right up the ***' if that's what it boils down to.

Quote:

Originally Posted by CthulhuDreams

Quote:

Could we please keep this game friendly?

Sorry, you set being friendly on fire by ramboing into me with no prelude at all. Hint: If you want friendly relations, don't be an ***!

Either you stop attacking me now and tear down that temple, or I'll see you in hell. While that temple is there, it's a standing declaration of war.

So, let's see... in the beginning, you were the one who was strongly against rules that would have prevented the situation we are now in, and then you act like a twelve-year-old when the rules you proposed don't work out in your favor.

I tried, REALLY tried (as anyone who looks in this thread will see) to keep things from getting personal. Apparently, instead of seeing this as me trying to be a good sport, you saw it as a sign of weakness, and decided to keep being nasty. Well, you better get used to me posting these quotes every time I see you try to join a new MP game from now on, because NOBODY wants to play with people like you.

CthulhuDreams · #3 November 27th, 2010, 04:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by earwicker7

So, let's see... in the beginning, you were the one who was strongly against rules that would have prevented the situation we are now in, and then you act like a twelve-year-old when the rules you proposed don't work out in your favor.

Sorry what?

We didn't have any sort of deal as far as I am aware. How would those rules have prevented anything? I had exchanged no prior communications with you at all in any format, and even when we 'bumped heads' in that neatural province, went on my merry way. I didn't message you in game, PM you, OR post in the forums about it.

Sure, I was annoyed because I'd lost an expansion force and my start was already pretty shakey.. but thems the breaks in the big city.

Subsequent events

A) You posted an threatening demand for tribute

B) You invaded one of my underwater provinces that I'd for several turns

C) You built a temple right next to my capital for the explicit purpose of dompushing me. You claimed it was to keep cold dominion out of your turf, but I don't think I even had a single candle on your territory.

At this point I get rather snippy and tell you I'd appreciate it if you shoved off unless you want to start a total war.

Your response was to attempt to invade me again. Then you are acting hurt and wounded by my stinging barbs to the effect of 'It's on now, and I am going to murderate [sic] you right in the face'

What did you think I was going to say when you invaded me? 'Welcome to the land of cuddly puppies here in Ryleh, and over there, we have kittens!'

Quote:

I tried, REALLY tried (as anyone who looks in this thread will see) to keep things from getting personal. Apparently, instead of seeing this as me trying to be a good sport, you saw it as a sign of weakness, and decided to keep being nasty.

I haven't actually done anything to you. Let's recap events

A) We bumped heads in a neatural province

B) You threatened me

C) You invaded me

D) You are now trying to dompush me. This is why I presume you are blatantly misrepresenting the candle situation.

That is HIGHLY aggressive behaviour from you. I didn't even talk to you AT ALL until you tried to invade me.

I'm not even sure what I did that you think is being nasty? It's pretty puzzling overall. I haven't made a single move against you to this date.. and I took what as a sign of weakness?

All things considered I'd rather not fight you, and I would have happily lived in peace and harmony, until, and I make this very explicit, you started it! And then having started it, you kept on at it!

All I want is to be left alone.

- Squids.

PS Mate, nothing is personal - we're both trying to win the game.

earwicker7 · #4 November 27th, 2010, 05:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CthulhuDreams

Quote:

Originally Posted by earwicker7

So, let's see... in the beginning, you were the one who was strongly against rules that would have prevented the situation we are now in, and then you act like a twelve-year-old when the rules you proposed don't work out in your favor.

Sorry what?

We didn't have any sort of deal as far as I am aware. How would those rules have prevented anything? I had exchanged no prior communications with you at all in any format, and even when we 'bumped heads' in that neatural province, went on my merry way. I didn't message you in game, PM you, OR post in the forums about it.

Sure, I was annoyed because I'd lost an expansion force and my start was already pretty shakey.. but thems the breaks in the big city.

Subsequent events

A) You posted an threatening demand for tribute

B) You invaded one of my underwater provinces that I'd for several turns

C) You built a temple right next to my capital for the explicit purpose of dompushing me. You claimed it was to keep cold dominion out of your turf, but I don't think I even had a single candle on your territory.

At this point I get rather snippy and tell you I'd appreciate it if you shoved off unless you want to start a total war.

Your response was to attempt to invade me again. Then you are acting hurt and wounded by my stinging barbs to the effect of 'It's on now, and I am going to murderate [sic] you right in the face'

What did you think I was going to say when you invaded me? 'Welcome to the land of cuddly puppies here in Ryleh, and over there, we have kittens!'

Quote:

I tried, REALLY tried (as anyone who looks in this thread will see) to keep things from getting personal. Apparently, instead of seeing this as me trying to be a good sport, you saw it as a sign of weakness, and decided to keep being nasty.

I haven't actually done anything to you. Let's recap events

A) We bumped heads in a neatural province

B) You threatened me

C) You invaded me

D) You are now trying to dompush me. This is why I presume you are blatantly misrepresenting the candle situation.

That is HIGHLY aggressive behaviour from you. I didn't even talk to you AT ALL until you tried to invade me.

I'm not even sure what I did that you think is being nasty? It's pretty puzzling overall. I haven't made a single move against you to this date.. and I took what as a sign of weakness?

All things considered I'd rather not fight you, and I would have happily lived in peace and harmony, until, and I make this very explicit, you started it! And then having started it, you kept on at it!

All I want is to be left alone.

- Squids.

PS Mate, nothing is personal - we're both trying to win the game.

Just quit calling me an *** and telling me to piss off and I have no problem with you. I'm fine with the "I'm going to burn Abyssia to the ground!" stuff... that's attacking my in-game character, not ME personally. Telling ME to piss off isn't cool, and that's why I'm angry.

Look, our nations are at war, and it's probably going to stay that way... sorry, but it just looks like too good of a strategic option to ignore.

That doesn't mean you need to be angry at me personally. It's a game, sometimes you're going to win, sometimes you're going to lose. I fully expect to lose this game in the end, because I've had some fairly crippling random events happen to me.

I'll say this again, just like I did before... let's bury the hatchet and keep the game friendly. When I say this, I mean all of us who are sitting behind our computers should be decent to each other. I'm not saying we have to keep it friendly in-game, as that would kind of defeat the whole purpose of having a game where you can win or lose.

Colonial · #5 November 27th, 2010, 05:43 PM

Reckon you two could move the yelling match to pm? I'm trying to watch the war (:P)

CthulhuDreams · #6 November 28th, 2010, 08:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by earwicker7

That doesn't mean you need to be angry at me personally. It's a game, sometimes you're going to win, sometimes you're going to lose. I fully expect to lose this game in the end, because I've had some fairly crippling random events happen to me.

I'll say this again, just like I did before... let's bury the hatchet and keep the game friendly. When I say this, I mean all of us who are sitting behind our computers should be decent to each other. I'm not saying we have to keep it friendly in-game, as that would kind of defeat the whole purpose of having a game where you can win or lose.

I'm not angry at you - I'd just be happier if everyone with a flames logo pissed off out of my turf. Or seaweed. Heck, even if they don't have a flames logo

PS. Attacking me an extremely poor strategic option. Your flaming fire infantry is EXTREMELY dangerous to everyone at this point. Except it cannot actually go underwater. Maybe if you've got the research sure, but you'd be better off tooling up with flaming evocations and attacking someone on land.

At the end of the day, Abysia has three great advantages

A) Blood magic

B) Fire Magic

C) Seriously hardcore flaming heavy infantry.

None of this works underwater. Attacking me is just picking a fight you cannot win. Sure, I doubt you will actually lose as I don't have the capability to fight your best troops on their own turf, but you're much, much better off attacking someone else.

Kaelik · #7 November 28th, 2010, 09:20 AM

Open call to Marignon, I sent you a PM, you didn't respond.

Colonial · #8 November 28th, 2010, 10:14 AM

any thoughts on shinuyama? staled and is now among the last to upload...

earwicker7 · #9 November 29th, 2010, 12:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CthulhuDreams

Quote:

Originally Posted by earwicker7

That doesn't mean you need to be angry at me personally. It's a game, sometimes you're going to win, sometimes you're going to lose. I fully expect to lose this game in the end, because I've had some fairly crippling random events happen to me.

I'll say this again, just like I did before... let's bury the hatchet and keep the game friendly. When I say this, I mean all of us who are sitting behind our computers should be decent to each other. I'm not saying we have to keep it friendly in-game, as that would kind of defeat the whole purpose of having a game where you can win or lose.

I'm not angry at you - I'd just be happier if everyone with a flames logo pissed off out of my turf. Or seaweed. Heck, even if they don't have a flames logo

PS. Attacking me an extremely poor strategic option. Your flaming fire infantry is EXTREMELY dangerous to everyone at this point. Except it cannot actually go underwater. Maybe if you've got the research sure, but you'd be better off tooling up with flaming evocations and attacking someone on land.

At the end of the day, Abysia has three great advantages

A) Blood magic

B) Fire Magic

C) Seriously hardcore flaming heavy infantry.

None of this works underwater. Attacking me is just picking a fight you cannot win. Sure, I doubt you will actually lose as I don't have the capability to fight your best troops on their own turf, but you're much, much better off attacking someone else.

Ok, I guess you may have a point there.

Look, I'm not going to tear down my temples, but I can offer you a 10 turn NAP and a promise of no more blood sacrifices in the provinces adjacent to yours for that time, which is what is causing the dompush.

Let me know.